Summary
The possibility of producing agronomically-useful somaclones via organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from callus cultures of pea (Pisum sativum L.) was studied. Organogenic calli were induced from immature leaflets on MSB medium with NAA and BAP. Embryogenic calli were derived either from immature zygotic embryos (using 2,4-D) or from shoot apices (using picloram) of aseptically-germinated seedlings.
The seed progenies (T1 to T3-generation) of primary regenerants were grown in field conditions and their phenotypic variation was evaluated and compared with control, non-tissue culture-derived plant material. In addition, electrophoretic analyses of selected isoenzyme systems and total proteins have been done. The results do not show dramatic changes in qualitative and quantitative traits. The evaluation of at least two future generations (T4, T5) is planned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Abbreviations
- BAP:
-
6-benzylaminopurine
- IBA:
-
indole-3-butyric acid
- MSB:
-
medium (mineral salts after Murashige & Skoog, 1962, vitamins after Gamborg et al., 1968)
- NAA:
-
α-naphthalene-acetic acid, picloram - 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro picolinic acid
- 2,4-D:
-
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, ORG - organogenesis
- SE:
-
somatic embryogenesis
References
Bajaj, Y.P.S. (Ed), 1990. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 11, Somaclonal Variation in Crop Improvement I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Cecchini, E., L. Natali, A. Cavallini & M. Durante, 1992. DNA variations in regenerated plants of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 874–879.
De Klerk, G.-J., 1990. How to measure somaclonal variation. Acta Bot. Neerl. 39: 129–144.
Gamborg, O.L., R.A. Miller & K. Ojima, 1968. Nutrient require-ments of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151–158.
Griga, M., 1990. The study of regeneration systems in vitro in pea, faba bean and soybean. Ph.D.-Thesis, Masaryk University, Brno 1990 (in Czech).
Griga, M., J. Stejskal & H. Klenotiɩová, 1992. Plant regeneration in soybean, pea and faba bean via somatic embryogenesis. p. 107–108. In: Proc. 1st Europ. Conf. on Grain Legumes. Angers, France.
Griga, M., E. Tejklová, F.J. Novák & M. Kubaláková, 1986. In vitro clonal propagation ofPisum sativum L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 6: 95–104.
Hussey, G. & H.V. Gunn, 1984. Plant production in pea (Pisum sativum L. cvs. Puget and Upton) from long-term callus with superficial meristems. Plant Sci. Lett. 37: 143–148.
Kysely, W., J.R. Myers, P.A. Lazzeri, G.B. Collins & H.J. Jacobsen, 1987. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Cell Rep. 6: 305–308.
Kysely, W. & H.J. Jacobsen, 1990. Somatic embryogenesis from pea embryos and shoot apices. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 20: 7–14.
Lehminger-Mertens, R. & H.J. Jacobsen, 1989. Plant regeneration from pea protoplasts via somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep. 8: 379–382.
Lutova, L.A. & E.K. Zabelina, 1988. Callus and shoot formation in different forms of Pisum sativum L. in vitro. Genetika 24: 1632–1640 (in Russian).
Mikhailova-Krumova, A.B., I.P. Gavrilyuk, M.I. Azarkovich & R.G. Butenko, 1991. Study of somaclonal variations in pea seed pro-teins. Fiziol. Rast. 38: 521–529 (in Russian).
Mroginski, L.A. & K.K. Kartha, 1981. Regeneration of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Century) plants by in vitro culture of immature leaflets. Plant Cell Rep. 1: 64–66.
Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 15: 472–497.
Natali, L. & A. Cavallini, 1987. Nuclear cytology of callus and plantlets regenerated from pea (Pisum sativum L.) meristems. Protoplasma 141: 121–125.
Özean, S., M. Barghchi, S. Firek & J. Draper, 1993. Efficient adventi-tious shoot regeneration and somatic embryogenesis in pea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 34: 271–277.
Rubluo, A., K.K. Kartha, L.A. Mroginski & J. Dyck, 1984. Plant regeneration from pea leaflets cultured in vitro and genetic sta-bility of regenerants. J. Plant Physiol. 117: 119–130.
Stejskal, J. & M. Griga, 1992. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Pisum sativum L. Biol. Plant 34: 15–22.
Tétu, T., R.S. Sangwan & B.S. Sangwan-Norreel, 1990. Direct somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis in cultured immature zygotic embryos of Pisum sativum L. J. Plant Physiol. 137: 102– 109.
Van Doorne, L.E., G. Marshall & R.C. Kirkwood, 1991. Develop-ment of herbicide tolerance in peas. II. Regeneration via somatic embryogenesis. p. 271–274. In: R.J. Froud-Williams, P. Gladders, M.C. Heath, J.F. Jenkyn, C.M. Knott, A. Lane & D. Pink (Eds). Aspects of Appl. Biol. 27, Production and Protection of Legumes. Assoc. Appl. Biol., Wellesbourne, Warwick.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Griga, M., Stejskal, J., Beber, K. (1995). Analysis of tissue culture-derived variation in pea (Pisum sativum L.)—preliminary results. In: Cassells, A.C., Jones, P.W. (eds) The Methodology of Plant Genetic Manipulation: Criteria for Decision Making. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0357-2_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0357-2_40
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4159-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0357-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive