Abstract
The term “a priori” is taken from Kant and has a special meaning in his system of thought, but the problem of the a priori, that is, the question of what is first in the order of knowledge, takes various forms in the thinking of contem-porary philosophers. For example, the question of what is first is manifested in the problem of “the given,” which has been formulated by men such as C. I. Lewis, Hans Reichenbach, Everett W. Hall,1 and others. The question of what is first also comes up in the study of basic philosophical metaphors. For example, the philosopher Max Black2 and the French phenomenologist Mikel Dufrenne,3 among others, have probed the basis of rudimentary philosophical conceptions in their linguistic studies of models and metaphors. Their thinking gives rise to questions such as this: if the study of philosophical meta-phors and scientific models takes us beyond model and metaphor to their origins in creative acts of genius, to what structural basis, then, can we look for the grounding of our conceptual world or even our linguistic world ? To these and other epistemological questions, as well as those concerning the foundations of logical systems, Carl G. Jung’s thought might be illuminating.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. I. Lewis, “The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge”, The Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also C. I. Lewis, Mind and World Order: Outline for a Theory of Knowledge (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1929); Hans Reichenbach, “Are Phenomenal Reports Absolutely Certain?” Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also Hans Reichenbach, Experience and Prediction (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1952 ); and Everett W. Hall, Philosophical Systems; a Categorial Analysis ( Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960 ).
C. I. Lewis, “The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge”, The Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also C. I. Lewis, Mind and World Order: Outline for a Theory of Knowledge (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1929); Hans Reichenbach, “Are Phenomenal Reports Absolutely Certain?” Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also Hans Reichenbach, Experience and Prediction (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1952 ); and Everett W. Hall, Philosophical Systems; a Categorial Analysis ( Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960 ).
C. I. Lewis, “The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge”, The Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also C. I. Lewis, Mind and World Order: Outline for a Theory of Knowledge (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1929); Hans Reichenbach, “Are Phenomenal Reports Absolutely Certain?” Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also Hans Reichenbach, Experience and Prediction (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1952); and Everett W. Hall, Philosophical Systems; a Categorial Analysis ( Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960).
C. I. Lewis, “The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge”, The Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also C. I. Lewis, Mind and World Order: Outline for a Theory of Knowledge (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1929); Hans Reichenbach, “Are Phenomenal Reports Absolutely Certain?” Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also Hans Reichenbach, Experience and Prediction (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1952); and Everett W. Hall, Philosophical Systems; a Categorial Analysis ( Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960).
C. I. Lewis, “The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge”, The Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also C. I. Lewis, Mind and World Order: Outline for a Theory of Knowledge (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1929); Hans Reichenbach, “Are Phenomenal Reports Absolutely Certain?” Philosophical Review, LXI, April, 1952; also Hans Reichenbach, Experience and Prediction (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1952); and Everett W. Hall, Philosophical Systems; a Categorial Analysis (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960).
Max Black, Models and Metaphors ( Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press, 1962).
Mikel Dufrenne, Language and Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1963).
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., 1961), 42–43 (-2; B 3).
Carl Gustav Jung, “The Role of the Unconscious”, Civilization in Transition trans. R. F. C. Hull (Bollingen Series XX: The Collected Works of C. G. Jung; New York: Pantheon Books, Inc., 1964), Vol. X, pp. 10–11 (14).
Carl Gustav Jung, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, trans. R. F. C. Hull (Bollingen Series XX: The Collected Works of C. G. Jung; New York: Pantheon Books, Inc., 1955), Vol. IX, Part I, p. 66 (136).
Ibid., pp. IOI (187).
Richard I. Evans, Conversations with Carl Jung and Reactions from Ernset Jones (Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Co., 1964), p. 83.
Jung, “Psychology of the Child Archetype”, The Archetypes and the Collecive Unconscious, pp. 153–154 (260).
Jung, Conversations with Carl Jung, p. 63.
Jung, Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, p. 19–20 (41).
R. B. Onians, Origins of European Thought About the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time and Fate (Cambridge, 1954); also Edward G. Ballard, “On Ritual and Persuasion in Plato”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, II, Summer, 1964.
R. B. Onians, Origins of European Thought About the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time and Fate (Cambridge, 1954); also Edward G. Ballard, “On Ritual and Persuasion in Plato”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, II, Summer, 1964.
Francis Conford, From Religion to Philosophy (New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1912); also Ernst Cassirer, Language and Myth, trans. Susanne K. Langer ( New York: Harper and Bros., 1946 )
Francis Conford, From Religion to Philosophy (New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1912); also Ernst Cassirer, Language and Myth, trans. Susanne K. Langer (New York: Harper and Bros., 1946)
Carl Gustav Jung, Aion; Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self, trans. R. F. C. Hull (Bollingen Series XX: The Collected Works of C. G. Jung; New York: Pantheon Books, Inc., 1955) Vol. IX Part II, pp. 62–63.
Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, pp. 384–484 (A 406–567; B 432–595).
Jung, “Archaic Man”, Civilization in Transition, p. 71 (144).
Jung, “The Role of the Unconscious”, Ibid., p. 18 (24).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pauson, M.L. (1969). C. G. Jung and the A Priori . In: Epistemology II. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3197-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3197-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0292-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3197-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive