Abstract
Living without a political state for almost two thousand years has had profound effects on the history, religion, culture and psychology of the Jewish people. Discussion of those effects has gained new meaning since 1948 and removed the issue from the purely academic plane. An Israeli professor has recently argued that with the emergence of the state of Israel, it is now possible to isolate those elements which truly make up the Jew, and at the same time identify those encrustations and accretions which are part of the diaspora baggage. “Zionism and the State of Israel,” says Ernst Simon of the Hebrew University, “having secured the social and national conditions for independent Jewish existence, have also made it possible to study the principles and commandments of the Jewish religion for their own sake — independently that is to say, theologically — it being no longer necessary or possible to base them on national needs alone. In the State of Israel the birth of a human being, as a son to his people, does not by itself make him a Jew. And so the history of the Jewish religion has arrived at a new point of departure.”1
Other people are led by their best and strongest. But the best and strongest are absorbed by the superior careers and pleasures of the environment—and the few who remain to lead, lead for the most part, to destroy. Israel Zangwill
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ernst Simon, “Are We Israelis Still Jews?” in Arguments and Doctrines edited by Arthur Cohen (New York, 1970), p. 397.
J. Marcus, Jewish Social Studies I, 1939, p. 263.
Ellis Rivkind, “The Diaspora: Its Historical Significance”, Studies of the Leo Baeck Institute edited by Max Kreutzberger (New York, 1967), p. 267.
Barnett Litvinoff, A Peculiar People (London, 1969), p. 1. The nature of that unifying transcendant bond is richly described by Robert Silverberg, a secular American-Jew whose book, If I Forget Thee O Jerusalem, includes a prefatory comment on the importance of the Six Day War.
Salo Baron and others have warned against the tendency to overemphasize the “lachrymose” interpretation of Jewish history. This writer feels that despite the quiet interludes, the holocaust makes even the term lachrymose appear insufficient.
Quoted in Arthur Hertzberg, The Zionist Idea (New York, 1969), p. 75.
Jacob L. Talmon, “Uniqueness and Universality of Jewish History”, in Arguments and Doctrines edited by Arthur Cohen (New York, 1970), p. 120.
Ernest Van den Haag, The Jewish Mystique (New York, 1969), pp. 16, 17.
Irving Howe, Decline of the New (New York, 1970), pp. 212, 216.
Ben Zion Dinur, Israel and the Diaspora (Philadelphia, 1969), p. 115.
Eugene Lipman, The Midrash: Oral Teachings of Judaism (New York, 1970) pp. 24–25.
Malachi Martin, The Encounter (New York, 1969), pp. 27–29, 79, 39, 40.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ages, A. (1973). The Consequences of Diaspora. In: The Diaspora Dimension. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2456-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2456-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2458-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2456-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive