Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Historical Library ((SYHL,volume 15))

  • 213 Accesses

Abstract

The present work has three principal objectives: (1) to fix the chronology of the development of the pre-Euclidean theory of incommensurable magnitudes beginning from the first discoveries by fifth-century Pythagoreans, advancing through the achievements of Theodoras of Cyrene, Theaetetus, Archytas and Eudoxus, and culminating in the formal theory of Elements X; (2) to correlate the stages of this developing theory with the evolution of the Elements as a whole; and (3) to establish that the high standards of rigor characteristic of this evolution were intrinsic to the mathematicians’ work. In this third point, we wish to counterbalance a prevalent thesis that the impulse toward mathematical rigor was purely a response to the dialecticians’ critique of foundations; on the contrary, we shall see that not until Eudoxus does there appear work which may be described as purely foundational in its intent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. P. Tannery, ‘Division du Canon’ (1904), MS III, pp. 213–219 and ‘Traité grec d’arithmétique’ (1905), ibid., pp. 244–250. The view is argued by B. L. van der Waerden, ‘Arithmetik’, M Ann$11947-49, 120, pp. 127–153 and SA 1954, pp. 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. G. Zeuthen, ‘Constitution des livres arithmétiques’, OverDVSF 1910, pp. 395–435.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. L. van der Waerden, SA 1954, p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Becker, ‘Eudoxos-Studien I’, QS1933, 2:B, pp. 311–333. His thesis is summarized by B. L. van der Waerden, SA 1954, pp. 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. E. Taylor, ‘Forms and Numbers’, Mind 1926, 35, pp. 419–440 and 1927, 36, pp. 12-33. E. Stamatis also insists that the Greeks accepted irrationals as numbers; ‘Irrationalzahlen’, PAA 1954, 29, pp. 337–345.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knorr, W.R. (1975). Introduction. In: The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements. Synthese Historical Library, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1754-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1754-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1192-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1754-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics