Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 2))

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

Since, unfortunately, I am not a neurophysiologist, but only a philosopher, I cannot cope with Dr. Pribram’s philosophical terminology. I have a hunch that the positions we take on the mind-body problem are convergent, but except for his piquant suggestion at the close (for which I myself have argued elsewhere) that mind is extrinsic and body intrinsic, I do not understand very much of his argument. ‘Critical realism’ was always over my head, so I have no idea what it is to refute it; and ‘isms’ in general are something I try, if I can, to avoid. So let me start, not so much from Pribram’s general thesis as from the passage by Karl Lashley that he has quoted, and then try to see in relation to some specific examples what the mind-body or mind-brain problem might be said to amount to and what direction we might take — or have taken — if not to resolve it, at least (as Lashley himself in his 1958 paper was professedly attempting) to lessen its tension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Derrida, J.: 1967, De La Grammatologie, Éditions de Minuit, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Derrida, J.: 1972, La Dissémination, Editions du Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Derrida, J.: 1967, L’Écriture et la Difference, Éditions du Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Derrida, J.: 1972, Marges de la Philosophie, Editions de Minuit, Paris; trans, by D. Allison in 1973, Speech and Phenomena, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, pp. 129–160.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fingarette, H.: 1969, Self-deception, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London; Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geschwind, N.: 1974, Selected Papers on Language and the Brain; Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XVI, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gibson, J.J.: 1966, The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gibson, J.J.: 1972, ‘A Theory of Direct Visual Perception’, in J.R. Royce and W.W. Rozeboom (eds.), The Psychology of Knowing, Gordon and Breach, New York, pp. 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gregory, R.: 1971, The Intelligent Eye, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grene, M.: 1974, The Understanding of Nature; Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XXIII, Reidel, Dordrecht, chs. XVIII and XIX.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heidegger, M.: 1927, Sein und Zeit, Niemeyer, Tubingen.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heidegger, M.: 1969, ‘Das Ende der Philosophie und die Aufgabe des Denkens’, Zur Sache des Denkens, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maclntyre, A.C.: 1958, The Unconscious, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matson, W.: 1976, Sentience, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merleau-Ponty, M.: 1945, La Phenomenologie de la Perception, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nagel, T.: 1974, ‘What is it Like to be a Bat?’, in Phil Rev. 83, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Plessner, H.: 1970, Philosophische Anthropologic, S. Fischer, Frankfurt, with ‘Nachwort’ by Gunter Dux.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Polanyi, M.: 1958, Personal Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pribram, K.: 1971, Languages of the Brain, Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Solomon, R.C.: 1974, ‘Freud’s Neurological Theory of Mind’, in R. Wollheim (ed.), Freud: A Collection of Critical Essays, Doubleday, New York, pp. 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sperry, R.W.: 1970, ‘Perception in the Absence of the Neocortical Commissures’, Perception and Its Disorders; Res. Pub. Ass. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 48, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Strawson, P.: 1958 ‘Persons’ in H. Feigl, M. Scriven and G. Maxwell (eds.), Concepts, Theories and the Mind-Body Problem, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. II, pp. 330–353. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Strawson, P.: 1959, Individuals, Methuen, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grene, M. (1976). Mind and Brain: The Embodied Person. In: Spicker, S.F., Engelhardt, H.T. (eds) Philosophical Dimensions of the Neuro-Medical Sciences. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1473-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1473-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1475-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1473-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics