Skip to main content
  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

More ink has probably been spilt in philosophy over the concept of causality than any other single concept. For Hume, for example, the causal relationship was a habit of expectancy, for Kant a conceptual category and for Maine de Biran a feeling of subjective effort. In recent years under the influence of phenomenology some writers, in particular the Gestalt psychologists and the Belgian psychologist Michotte,1 have argued that we have a direct perception of causality much in the same way as we perceive shape and movement. Michotte gives the example of a knife cutting a slice of bread. We do not, he says, just see two independent movements, the advance of the knife and the cutting of the bread; we have a specific causal impression of the two movements as essentially and temporally coordinated, forming a continuous process in which one is productive of changes in the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Michotte, The Perception of Causality, translated by T.R. & Elaine Miles, London, Methuen, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Symbolism its Meaning and Effect, cf. p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. PR, cf. p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., cf. pp. 245–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gestalt Psychology, New York 1929, cf. p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  6. PR. cf. pp. 246–247.

    Google Scholar 

  7. “Intentionality: A Fundamental Idea of Husserl’s Phenomenology,” translated by Joseph P. Fell, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 1 No. 2, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Perception of Causality, p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A Study of Psychology in Autobiography, Vol. III.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Perception of Causality, p. 410.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 413.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 413.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mays, W. (1977). Causation and Perception. In: Whitehead’s Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1085-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1085-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1979-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1085-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics