Skip to main content

People are not Computers

(Most) Thought Processes are Not Computational Procedures

  • Chapter
  • 192 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Cognitive Systems ((COGS,volume 25))

Abstract

As a professional philosopher, of course, I have become accustomed to the truth that no position is so absurd that some philosopher has not held it. As a human being, of course, I have also had to personally cope with experiences in life that have involved formal systems and syntax processing. Sometimes our professional activities become detached from our life experiences to a degree that might astonish empirical scientists. Our enthusiasm for a theoretical position may even appear to be virtually independent of our experiences in life, which, were they only taken seriously, might completely undermine what we take as our best theories. The computational conception that dominates what is known as “cognitive science” provides a remarkable illustration of this point. Even if some of our thought processes are computational, most of them are not, which makes our best theory either trivial or false. We need something better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beth, E. W. (1969), “Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability”, in J. Hintikka, ed., The Philosophy of Mathematics (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1995a), “On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1995), pp. 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1995b), “How Many Concepts of Consciousness?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1995), pp. 272–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1939), Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume 1, Number 3. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. (1959), “Logic, formal”, in D. Runes, ed., Dictionary of Philosophy (Ames, IO: Littlefield, Adams & Company, 1959), pp. 170–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (1993), “Is the Church-Turing Thesis True?”, Minds and Machines 3 (1993), pp. 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, P. (1997), “Meaning, Mistake and Miscalculation”, Minds and Machines 7 (1997), pp. 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. and G. Schwarz (1991), “Connectionism, Computation and Cognition”, in T. Horgan and J. Tienson, eds., Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991), pp. 60–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, E. (1991), “Computationalism”, Social Epistemology 4 (1991), pp. 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1988a), “Signs and Minds: An Introduction to the Theory of Semiotic Systems”, in J. H. Fetzer, ed., Aspects of Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988), pp. 133–161.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1988b), “Program Verification: The Very Idea”, Communications of the ACM (September 1988), pp. 1048–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1989), “Language and Mentality: Computational, Representational, and Dispositional Conceptions”, Behaviorism 17 (1989), pp. 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1990a), “The Frame Problem: Artificial Intelligence Meets David Hume”, Expert Systems 3 (1990), pp. 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1990b), Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1991a), Philosophy and Cognitive Science. New York, NY: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1991b), “Primitive Concepts: Habits, Conventions, and Laws”, in J. H. Fetzer, ed., Definitions and Definability (Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991), pp. 51–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1992), “Connectionism and Cognition: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn are Wrong”, in A. Clark and R. Lutz, eds., Connectionism in Context (London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 1992), pp. 37–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1994a), “Mental Algorithms: Are Minds Computational Systems?”, Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1994), pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1994b), “What Makes Connectionism Different? Discussion Review of W. Ramsey, S. Stich, and D. Rumelhart, eds., Philosophy and Connectionist Theory”, Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1994), pp. 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1995), “Minds and Machines: Behaviorism, Dualism, and Beyond”, Stanford Humanities Review 4 (1995), pp. 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1996a), “Computer Reliability and Public Policy: Limits of Knowledge of Computer-Based Systems”, Philosophy and Public Policy 13 (1996), pp. 229–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (1996b). Philosophy and Cognitive Science, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (forthcoming), Evolution and the Mind (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1975), The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, P. and P. Weiss (1960), The Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J. (1981), “Semantic Engines: An Introduction to Mind Design”, in J. Haugeland, ed., Mind Design (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1981), pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C. (1967), Mathematical Logic. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliban, B. (1982), Two Guys Fooling Around with the Moon. New York, NY: Workman Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1981), “Artificial Intelligence: A Personal View”, in J. Haugeland, ed., Mind Designs (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1981), pp. 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and H. Simon (1976), “Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search”, reprinted in J. Haugeland, ed., Mind Design (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1981), pp. 35–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1989), The Emperor’s New Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S., ed. (1977), Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1992), The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eckhardt, B. (1993), What is Cognitive Science? Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fetzer, J.H. (2001). People are not Computers. In: Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0973-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0973-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0243-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0973-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics