Abstract
One of the main challenges for computational lexical semantics is to bridge the gap between on the one hand theoretical research on the organization of the lexicon and on the formal representation of word meaning, and on the other hand the increasing need by natural language processing (NLP) systems of accessing large repositories of lexical knowledge. The latter, in fact, represents one of the most critical bottle-necks in the development of robust and efficient systems endowed with linguistic intelligence, given the time-consuming and difficult effort required by the construction and maintenance of lexical knowledge bases. This problem has recently been tackled by designing and developing (both at the national and at the international level) general lexical resources based on a common model, with the aim to provide an explicit and (possibly) standard representation of the linguistic content of lexical items at various levels of representation. Actually, their design represents an important challenge for the computational linguistics community, both from the theoretical and the applicative point of view. The difficulty of this enterprise is given by the inherently multi-purpose and domain-independent vocation of such lexical knowledge bases, since they are intended not to be restricted to specific terminological domains or application types, in order to ensure the maximum degree of portability and reusability. In fact, while application needs and domain features set natural constraints on the format of the lexicons, as well as on the type of the information they must contain, similar constraints are not available for the design of a lexicon which aims to provide general linguistic knowledge. In such cases it is crucial to provide satisfactory answers to issues like: What information a computational lexicon must contain? How to represent this information? What is the format to give to a lexical entry?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apresyan, Y. (1973) Regular Polysemy. Linguistics, 142, 5–32.
Bouillon, P. (1997) Polymorphic et sémantique lexicale: le cas des adjectifs. Thèse de troisième cycle, Université de Paris VIL
Busa, F. (1996) Compositionality and the Semantics of Nommais. Ph.D. Dissertation, Brandeis University.
Calzolari, N. (1991) Acquiring and Representing Semantic Information in a Lexical Knowledge Base. In J. Pustejovsky, editor, Proceedings of the Workshop on Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation, Berkeley, CA, 1991.
Chomsky, N. (1995) Language and Nature. Mind, 104, 1–61.
Guarino, N. (1998) Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Granada, Spain, 28-30 May 1998.
Keil, F. (1989) Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lenci, A., F. Busa, N. Ruimy, E. Gola, M. Monachini, N. Calzolari, A. Zampolli, J. Pustejovsky, A. Ogonowski, C. McCawley, I. Peters, W. Peters, R. Gaizauskas and M. Villegas (2000) SIMPLE Linguistic Specifications. Deliverable D2.1, ILC-CNR, Pisa, March 20
Levin, B. (1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moravcsik, J. (1998) Meaning, Creativity, and the Partial Inscrutability of the Human Mind. Stanford: CSLI.
Nunberg, G. and A. Zaenen (1992) Systemic Polysemy in Lexicology and Lexicography. In Tommola, H., K. Varantola, T. Salmi-Tolonen and J. Schopp, editors, EURALEX′92 Proceedings I-II, Fifth EURALEX International Congress, Studia Translatologica, Ser. A, Vol. 1, University of Tampere, 1992.
Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, J. (1998) Specification of a Top Concept Lattice. Manuscript, Brandeis University.
Pustejovsky, J. and B. Boguraev (1993) Lexical Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Processing. Artificial Intelligence 63, 193–223.
Pustejovsky, J. and F. Busa (1995) Unaccusativity and Event Composition. In P.M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higginbotham and M. Squartini, editors, Temporal Reference: Aspect and Actionality, Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Busa, F., Calzolari, N., Lenci, A., Pustejovsky, J. (2001). Building a Semantic Lexicon: Structuring and Generating Concepts. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R., Thijsse, E. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0451-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0572-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive