Skip to main content

On the Definition of Spin for a Radiation Field [1942e]

  • Chapter
Selected Papers of Léon Rosenfeld

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 21))

  • 296 Accesses

Abstract

Using the general expression (1) for the energy-momentum tensor of any field, it is possible to define the spin or intrinsic angular momentum of the field, contained in a given region. But it is clear that this definition is ambiguous due to the fact that a certain integral over the surface of the domain under consideration can be retained or omitted at will in this definition; and, for a radiation field, this integral might very well be different from zero. Let us define a radiation field to be a field the amplitude of which at a distance R from a fixed point does not fall off more rapidly than R −1. The purpose of this note is simply to show that in this case the flux of spin carried by the radiation field — which is in fact the quantity having a direct physical significance — is not affected by the ambiguity in question. For a better understanding, we will summarize, as briefly as possible, the entire problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. F. J. Belinfante, Physica 7 (1940), 449; L. Rosenfeld, Mem. Acad. Roy. Belg. (Cl. Sciences) 18, fasc. 6 (1940), Cf. §5, formula (I) [this volume, p. 711]. This present note supplements these papers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. It can be verified (cf. L. Rosenfeld, loc. cit. (1). pp. 24–25) that these two terms have the non-commutative properties required for this interpretation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Serpe, Physica 8 (1941), 748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The non-commutative properties of \( \overline M _{s}^{{ik}} \) and \( M_{s}^{{ik}} \) are obviously identical.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Bohr, Fastperiodische Funktionen, §46, theorem I. [See English translation, Almost Periodic Functions (Chelsea Publ., New York, 1947) — Ed.].

    Google Scholar 

  6. I owe this remark to M. D. J. Bouman.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Humblet, work in preparation. [We have not traced this work — Ed.]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Robert S. Cohen John J. Stachel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, R.S., Stachel, J.J. (1979). On the Definition of Spin for a Radiation Field [1942e]. In: Cohen, R.S., Stachel, J.J. (eds) Selected Papers of Léon Rosenfeld. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9349-5_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9349-5_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0652-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9349-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics