Skip to main content

Presentation of Information for Printed Publications, Slides and Posters

  • Chapter
Data in Medicine: Collection, Processing and Presentation

Abstract

A vitally important part of any research activity is the dissemination of results to other research workers, to students, and to those in a position to implement the findings in a practical way. This dissemination process can take place in a number of ways, but in most cases some kind of visual presentation of all or part of the information is necessary. Printed material, in the form of journal articles, reports and books, is perhaps the most commonly used medium for publicizing research results, and here the presentation is entirely visual. At conferences, visual aids such as slides are used as an essential complement to the spoken word. More recently posters have begun to become popular as a means of presenting summaries of research results. In all three cases, the quality of the visual presentation will affect the ease with which potential users of the results are able to read, understand and remember the information given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beeby, A.W. and Taylor H.P.J. (1973): How well can we use graphs? Communication of Scientific and Technical Information, 17, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blaauw, H.J.A. (1975): Informatie over het gebruik van audiovisuele media. University of Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burnhill, P. (1970): Typographic education: headings in text. Journal of Typographic Research, 4 (4), 353.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burnhill, P., Hartley, J., and Davies L. (1977): Typographic decision making: the layout of indexes. Applied Ergonomics, 8 (1), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burnhill, P., Hartley, J., and Young, M. (1976): Tables in text. Applied Ergonomics, 7 (1), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burt, C.L. (1959): A psychological study of typography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, L.F. (1947): An experiment on the design of tables and graphs used for presenting numerical data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 31, 640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cattell, J.McK. (1885): Ãœber die Zeit der Erkennung und Benennung von Schriftzeichen, Bildern und Farben. Philosophische Studien, 2, 635.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dooley, R.P. and Harkins, L.E. (1970): Function and attention-getting effects of colour on graphic communications. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 31, 851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dwyer, F.M. (1976): The effect of IQ level on the instructional effectiveness of black and white and colour illustrations. Audio Visual Communications Review, 24, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erdmann, B. and Dodge, R. (1898): Psychologische Untersuchungen über das Lesen, auf experimenteller Grundlage. Max Niemeyer, Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frase, L.T. (1969): Tabular and diagrammatic presentation of verbal materials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 29(1), 320.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galer, I.A.R. (1976): Projector slides - preparation, construction and use. Applied Ergonomics 7 (4); 190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldscheider, A. and Müller, R.F. (1893): Zur Physiologie und Pathologie des Lesens. Zeitschrift für Klinische Medizin, 23, 131.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hailstone, M. (1973): A case for standardisation in the preparation of graphs and diagrams. Medical and Biological Illustration, 23, 8 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hartley, J., Young, M., and Burnhill, P. (1975): On the typing of tables. Applied Ergonomics, 6, 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Javal, E. (1905): Physiologie de la lecture et de l’écriture. Felix Alcan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCormick, E.J. (1976): Human factors in engineering and design. McGraw Hill Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Messmer, O. (1903): Zur Psychologie des Lesens bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 2, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Metcalf, R.M. (1969): The effects of visual angle, brightness and contrast on the visibility of projected material. Dissertation Abstracts, 29 (10-A); 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Milroy, R., and Poulton, E.C. (1978): Labelling graphs for improved reading speed. Ergonomics, 21(1), 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morton, R. (1968): The lantern slide: legibility and production. The Photographic Journal, April, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Omi-Information. (1977) University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Operbeck, H. (1970): Effect of paper and ink gloss on legibility. Journal of Typographic Research, 4 (2), 187.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poulton, E.C. (1959): Effects of printing types and formats on the comprehension of scientific journals. Nature 184, 1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poulton, E.C. (1969)• Skimming lists of food ingredients printed in different brightness contrasts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53 (6), 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prince, J.H. (1967): Printing for the visually handicapped. Journal of Typographic Research, 1(1), 31.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Rawlinson, G. (1975): How do we recognize words? New Behaviour, (August 28 ), 336.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schutz, H.G. (1961): An evaluation of methods for presentation of graphic multiple trends. Human Factors, 3, 108.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schutz, H.G. (1961): An evaluation of formats for graphic trend displays — Experiment 2, Human Factors 3, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Simmonds, D. (1976): Medical chartist’s dilemma. Medical and Biological Illustration, 26, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, J.M. and McCombs, M.E. (1971): The graphics of prose. Journalism Quarterly, 48, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Snowberg, R.L. (1973): Bases for the selection of background colours for transparencies, Audio Visual Communication Review, 21, 191.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spencer, H. (1968): The visible word. Lund Humphries, London.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Spencer, H. and Reynolds, L. (1976): Factors affecting the acceptability of microforms as a reading medium. Royal College of Art, Reliability of Print Research Unit, London.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spencer, H. and Reynolds, L. (1977): Directional signing and labelling in libraries and museums: a review of current theory and practice. Royal College of Art, Readability of Print Research Unit, London.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Spencer, H., Reynolds, L., and Coe, B. (1973): A comparison of the effectiveness of selected typographic variations. Royal College of Art, Readability of Print Research Unit, London.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spencer, H., Reynolds, L., and Coe, B. (1975): Spatial and typographic coding in printed bibliographical materials. Journal of Documentation, 31 (2), 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Spencer, H., Reynolds, L., and Coe, B. (1977): The effects of show-through on the legibility of printed text. Royal College of Art, Readability of Print Research Unit, London.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spencer, H., Reynolds, L., and Coe, B. (1977): The effects of image degradation and background noise on the legibility of text and numerals in four different typefaces. Royal College of Art, Readability of Print Research Unit 1975, revised, London.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tinker, M.A. (1963): Legibility of print. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tinker, M.A. (1965): Bases for effective reading. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Van Cott, H.P., and Kinkade, R.G. (1972): Human engineering guide to equipment design. Superintendent of Documents, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wilkinson, G.L. (1976): Projection variables and performance. Audio Visual Communication Review, 24, 413.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Woodward, R.M. (1972): Proximity and direction of arrangement in numeric displays. Human Factors, 14, 337.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Wright, P. (1977): Presenting technical information: a survey of research findings. Instructional Science, 6, 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wright, P. and Fox, K. (1970): Presenting information in tables. Applied Ergonomics, 1, 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zachrisson, B. (1965): Studies in legibility of printed text. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv. The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, L., Spencer, H., Reneman, R.S. (1979). Presentation of Information for Printed Publications, Slides and Posters. In: Reneman, R.S., Strackee, J. (eds) Data in Medicine: Collection, Processing and Presentation. Instrumentation and Techniques in Clinical Medicine, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9309-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9309-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9311-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9309-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics