Abstract
Perhaps the most striking characteristic of the thousand year history of Poland has been the frequent shifting of its borders from west to east and back again. The restoration of an independent Polish state after World War I did not change the basic problem of its unique geographic location, a peculiarity that dictated an interconnection between its external and internal policies. In this setting, preservation of independence was the overriding consideration of the Poles. Indeed, throughout the interwar period, 1919–1939, Poland’s position in the international arena was precarious. The foundation on which Polish independence rested was as fragile as the whole European security system. During this period, Great Britain and, to a lesser extent, France thought they could escape reality by turning away from the troubled continent that had re-emerged after the First World War. From the beginning, neither Germany nor the Soviet Union looked favorably on the restored Polish state with its western boundaries determined by the Treaty of Versailles (partly by plebiscite) and its eastern boundaries settled by the force of arms, confirmed by the Treaty of Riga in 1921, and recognized by Great Britain as well as other Western powers in the Conference of Ambassadors in 1923. In 1922, the arbiter of German foreign policy, Foreign Minister Gustav Stresemann, wrote: “Poland’s existence is intolerable, incompatible with the essential conditions of Germany’s life.”1 He considered Polish-German frontiers to be fluid in the long run, and thus he anticipated that German pressure, with Soviet cooperation, might facilitate German recovery of the Polish Corridor, Danzig, and Upper Silesia.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Quoted in William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany ( New York: Simon & Schuster, 1960 ), p. 212.
Zygmunt Gasiorowski, “Stresemann and Poland before Locarno,” Journal of Central European Affairs, XVIII (1958), p. 42, p. 299. Cited hereafter JCEA.
Jozef Korbel, Poland Between East and West ( Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963 ), p. 5.
Conversations between Beck and French Foreign Minister Pierre Laval, Jan Szembek, Diariusz: Teki Jana Szembeka, (Diary and Papers from the Files of Jan Szembek), ed. Tytus Komarnicki, I (London: Polish Research Center, 1964), No. 3, Enclosure. Cited hereafter SD.
Conversation between Beck and French Foreign Minister Laval. January 16 and 19, 1935, SD, No. 3, Enclosure.
Joseph Beck, Final Report, trans. Tytus Komarnicki and Michal Lubienski (New York: Robert Speller & Sons, Publishers, Inc., 1957), PP. 31–34.
Adam Bromke, Poland’s Politics: Idealism vs. Realism, ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967 ), p. 42.
Ferdynand Zweig, Poland between Two Wars: A Critical Study of Social and Economic Changes (London: Secker & Warburg, 1944), p. 12. C.A. Macartney and A.W. Palmer observed that for almost a decade after the First World War, the history of Poland “revolved romantically around the personality of one man, Joseph Pilsudski.” Independent Eastern Europe: A History ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1962 ), p. 182.
Antony Polonsky, Politics in Independent Poland 1921–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), p. 203. For a discussion of economic recovery see pp. 203–208. For additional books on Poland during the interwar period, see: Raymond L. Buell, Poland: Key to Europe (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1939 ): and Hugh Seton-Watson, Eastern Europe Between the Wars, 1919–1941. (3d ed.: Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 5962 ).
Poland, Constitution de la République de Pologne de Mars, 1921 ( Warsaw: Société de Publications Internationales, 1921 ).
Poland, Constitution de la République de Pologne d’Avril, 1935 ( Warsaw: Commission Polonaise de Coopération Juridique Internationale, 1935 ).
Slanislaw Sopecki, Review of Diariusz i Teki Jana Szembeka, Vol. II, Dziennik Polski, Polish Daily, January 15, 1966.
Roman Debicki, Foreign Policy of Poland, 1919–1939 ( New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1962 ), pp. 40–41.
Stanislaw Mackiewicz, Colonel Beck and His Policy ( London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1944 ), p. 108.
Jacques Bainville, La Russie et la barrière de l’est (Paris: Librairie Plon, 1937), pp. 574–575.
See Piotr Wandycz. “Sojusz Polsko-Francuski z 1921 roku,” (Polish-Soviet Alliance of 1921) Kultura, 11145 (1950, pp. so8–122 and Jules LaRoche, La Pologne de Pilsudski: Souvenirs d’une Ambassade 1926–1935 (Poland of Pilsudski: Memoirs of an Ambassador 1926–1935) (Paris: Flammarion, 1953), p. 15. See also General Gamelin, Servir, Vol. II: Le Prologue de Drame (Prologue to Disaster) (Paris: Librarie Plon, 5947), P. 466; and Polskie Sily Zbrojne w Drugiej Wojnie Swiatowej. (The Polish Armed Forces in the Second World War), I, Pt. 1 (London: General Sikorski Historical Institute, 1951), pp. 87–88. Cited hereafter PSZ.
James M. Spaight, Pseudo-Security (New York: Longmans, Green & Co., 1925 ), pp. 137–38.
Great Britain, 5 Parliamentary Debates (Commons), CLXXXVIII, Col. 429.
Studies in Diplomatic History (London: Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1930 ), p. 156.
Lewis Namier, Diplomatic Prelude, 1938–1939 (London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd., 1948), p. 437. “As a whole, the Locarno Treaties presented more problems than they solved.”
Fritz J. Barber, ed., Locarno: A Collection of Documents ( London: William Hodge & Co., 1936 ), pp. 62–63.
Szembek-Laroche conversation February 3, 1935, SD, p. 228.
Note from Barthou to British government, April 17, 1934, SD, p. 143.
Great Britain, Correspondence Showing the Course of Certain Discussions Directed toward Securing an European Settlement, June 1934 to March 1936, Cmd. 5143 ( London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1936 ).
Laroche, p. 170. See also: Memorandum from British Military Attache (Warsaw), July 21, 1934, Great Britain, Foreign Office, 3 Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939, VI, Ends. No. 519. Cited hereafter DBFP.
July 13, 1934, CCXCII, Cols. 693–702. Beck differentiated between the Locarno Pact and the proposed Eastern Locarno Alliances by the presence and the absence of a British guarantee.
The Origins of the Second World War (New York: Atheneum, 1962), p. 38.
Anna M. Cienciala, Poland and the Western Powers, 1938–1939 ( Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968 ), p. 19.
Arnold Wolfers, Britain and France between Two Wars (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1940 ), p. 127.
For a critique, see: Etienne Mantoux, The Carthaginian Peace: Or the Economic Consequences of Mr. Keynes. (London: Oxford University Press, 1946 ).
Speech in Portmadoc, quoted in Société des Nations, III (1921), p. 413. He also contended that the British people considered the population of that area “unstable and excitable” and noted that they may start fighting at any time and further, that the rights and wrongs might be very hard to disentangle. Cmd. No. 2169 Negotiations for Anglo-French Pact. See also: Anna M. Cienciala, “Polish Foreign Policy 1926–1939 — Equilibrium: Stereotype and Reality, ” The Polish Review, Vol. XX, No. 1 (1975), pp. 42–57.
R.B. McCallum, Public Opinion and the Last Peace (London: Oxford University Press, 1944), pp. 120–24. Even well-educated Britons were notoriously ill-informed when McCallum in 1933 asked a number of people to estimate the population of Poland. A common response was four million.
Harold B. Butler, The Lost Peace: A Personal Impression (London: Faber Faber Ltd., 1941 ), p. 138. See also Giseler Wirsing, Zwischeneuropa und die Deutsche Zukunft, (Middle Europe and the German Future), ( Zena: Eugen & Dederich, 1933 ).
Halifax, March 31, 1937, Parliamentary Debates (Lords) CVII, Col. 498.
Speech in Birmingham, April 8, 1938, The Times (London) April 9, 1938, p. 17. See Thomas Jones, ADairy with Letters, 1931–1950 (London: Oxford University Press, 1954), p. 411, for the opposite view. Jones, former secretary to both Lloyd George and Baldwin, remained very close to the latter. He was pro-German and seems to have been a tool used by Joachim Ribbentrop (Germany Foreign Minister) to influence Baldwin.
Cited by Sir Charles A. Petrie, The Life and Letters of the Right Hon. Sir Austen Chamberlain. (London, 1940 ), Vol. z, p. 259 cited in Cienciala, p. 21.
David Lloyd George, The Truth about the Peace Treaties (London: V. Gollanz Ltd., 1938), I. pp. 39o: 310.
Speeches of June 27 and 29, 1937, Phillip Kerr (Lord Lothian), Lord Lothian vs. Lord Lothian (Scotch Plains, H. J.: Flanders Hall, 1940), pp. 19. 36.
Documents and Materials relating to the Eve of the Second World War. (New York: International Publishers, 1948), I, No. 1. Although these documents were first published by the Soviet Union in 1948, the account seems to coincide with that given by Halifax in Fullness of Days ( London: Collins, 1957 ), pp. 184–191.
Vol. IV: The 150th Anniversary and Beyond: 1912–1948 (London: Written and published at the Office of The Times, (1952), Pt. 2, P. 794.
Minutes by Sir O. Sargent, March 16, 1939, DBFP, IV, No. 298. T ilea repeated the rumor the next day to Halifax. Halifax to Hoare, March 17, 1939, No. 395.
Halifax, Foreign Secretary to Kennard (Warsaw), March 31, 1939, DBFP, 3, IV, No. 584. 64 Ivonn Kilpatrick, The Inner Circle ( London: Macmillan, 1959 ), P. 141.
Ambassador Kennedy to Secretary of State, August 30, 1939, U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States: 1938–1945. (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1955–1963), II, 1939, p. 392. Cited hereafter FRUS.
Henderson to Halifax, August 30, 1939, DBFP, 3, VII, No. 537. See also Templewood, p. 299.
The Second World War, Vol. I: The Gathering Storm ( Boston: Houghton Mifin Company, 1948 ), P. 30.
Record of Anglo-French conversation, March 22, 1939, DBFP, 3, IV, No. 484.
Minutes by Strang, June 10, 1939, DBFP, 3, VI, No. 922.
Record of the Anglo-Franco-Soviet Military Conversations in Moscow, 4th meeting, August 14, 1939, DBFP, 3, VII, Appendix II, p. 573.
Halifax to Kennard (Warsaw), August 17, 1939, DBFP, 3, VII, No. 38. For the various approaches of the British and French Ambassadors and their military attaches to Poland in August 1939, see Appendix II, pp. 558–60.
Kennard (Warsaw) to Halifax, August 18, 1939, DBFP, 3, VII, No. 52.
Lukasiewicz Diaries, DP, November 11, 1946. See William L. Langer and S. Everett Gleason, The Challenge to Isolation, 1937–1940 ( New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1952 ), P. 179.
U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1938, II, ( Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1956 ), p. 269.
Record of a conversation between Voroshilov and Doumenc, August 21, 1939, DBFP, 3, VII, Appendix, p. 609.
DBFP, 3, VII, pp. 612–13. Lukasiewicz claims that on August 22, his government consented to the passage of Soviet troops, but this information is unsubstantiated. See Lukasiewicz Diaries, DP, November 11, 1946.
Seeds (Moscow) to Halifax, August 23, 1939, DBFP, 3, VII, No. 164.
History of the Communist Party of the USSR, B. Ponomaryov, ed., (Eng. trans) ( Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1974 ), p. 239.
Great Patriotic War of the Soviet Union 1941–1945, M.M. Minasyan, ed., trans. D. Skvirsky, V. Schneirson, ( Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1974 ), p. 20.
DMISPO, No. 104. For a discussion of the military negotiations see Nos. 79–103.
Years of Trials and Victories,“ M.I. Semiryaga in Liberation Mission, Marshal A.A. Grechko, ed., trans. D. Fidlon, (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1975), p. 20.
History of Soviet Foreign Policy 1917–1945, B. Ponomaryov, A. Gromyko, V. Khvostov, eds., trans. D. Skvirsky, ( Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969 ), p. 385.
The Central Blue, (London: Cassel & Co. Ltd., 1956 ), p. 214.
Lord Halifax, Fullness of Days (London: Collins, 1957), p. 205. Relevant documents do not bear out this assumption. Indeed, Beck expected more, but promised military and financial aid did not materialize.
Carl J. Burckhart, Meine Danziger Mission, 1937–1939, (Munich: Callweg, 1960), p. 156–7 and Gerhard L. Weinberg “Germany Foreign Policy in Poland 1937–8” in Polish Review, Vol. XX, No. 1, 1975, p. 19.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kacewicz, G.V. (1979). Historical Setting. In: Great Britain, The Soviet Union and the Polish Government in Exile (1939–1945). Studies in Contemporary History, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9272-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9272-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9274-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9272-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive