Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Language Library ((SLAP,volume 19))

Abstract

This paper is an investigation into the criteria for establishing syntacitc categories, and more specifically, into the problem of distinguishing between the categories of Adjective and Preposition. I will argue that in the history of English, at least two adjectives, like and worth, were reanalyzed as prepositions. Two questions come to mind: Why did the categorial reanalysis take place? What were the grammatical consequences of the reanalysis, i.e. what change(s) in the words’ use followed as a result? The answers to these questions provide evidence as to the grammatical function of complements of different syntactic categories. They also show how very little of the evidence traditionally used by linguists to establish categories is strictly syntactic in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Allen, C.: 1977, Topics in Diachronic Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, U. Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. L. and J. McCarthy (eds.): 1981, The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltin, M.: 1978, Toward a Theory of Movement Rules, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, A.: 1974, ‘Adjectives and Adjective Complement Constructions in English’, Report No. NSF-29, Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth-Toller: 1898, An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J.: 1975, ‘Adjectives and Adverbs in English’, Foundations of Language 13, 529–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J.: 1973, ‘Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 275–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J.: 1978, ‘A Realistic Transformational Grammar’, in M. Halle, J. Bresnan, and G. Miller (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J.: 1980, ‘The Passive in Lexical Theory’, Occasional Papers No. 7, MIT Center for Cognitive Science; to appear in Bresnan (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J.: 1981, ‘Control and Complementation’, to appear in Bresnan (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. (ed.): in press, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press (to appear 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D.: 1967, ‘Word Classes in English’, Lingua 17, 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dik, S.: 1968, Coordination: Its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, J.: 1976, A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: 1975, ‘Evidence for Relativization by Deletion in Chaucerian Middle English’, NELS V, pp. 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: 1981a, ‘Form, Function and the Language Acquisition Device’, in C. L. Baker and J. McCarthy (1981), pp. 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J .: 1981b, ‘Subcategorization and Grammatical Relations’, paper presented at the Harvard Mini-Conference on the Representation of Grammatical Relations, December 12,1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: in prep., ‘Theories of Subcategorization’, Linguistics Program, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, R.: 1978, ‘The Phrase Structure of Adjectives and Comparatives’, Linguistic Analysis 4, 255–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heny, F.: 1979, Review article, Chomsky, N., The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Synthese 40, 317–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. S.: 1972, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. S.: 1973, ‘The Base Rules for Prepositional Phrases’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 345–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. S.: 1977, X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Two, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and J. Bresnan: 1980, ‘A Formal System for Grammatical Representation’, Occasional Papers No. 13, MIT Center for Cognitive Science; to appear in Bresnan (ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, D.: 1980, ‘The History of NP Movement’, in T. Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst, and M. Moortgat (eds.), Lexical Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 255–284; also in C. L. Baker and J. McCarthy (1981), pp. 86–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J.: 1968, An Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, J.: 1979, ‘Adjective Phrases and the Order of Constituents’, unpublished generals paper, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, J. and A. Zaenen: 1981, ‘Germanic Word Order and the Format of Surface Filters’, in F. Heny (ed.), Binding and Filtering, Croom-Held, London and MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp. 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary, A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanni, D.: 1980, ‘On the Surface Syntax of Constructions with Easy-type Adjectives’, Language 56, 568–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, D. (ed.): to appear, Studies in Relational Grammar, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.: 1981a, ‘Problems with Constraints on Coordination’, Linguistic Analysis 8, 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.: 1981b, The Progressive Construction in English, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Newcastle, N.S.W., Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: 1980, ‘A Theory of the Acquisition of Lexical-interpretive Grammars’, Occasional Papers No. 6, MIT Center for Cognitive Science; to appear in Bresnan (ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, C.: 1980, ‘Adjectives with Noun Phrase Complements in Swedish — A Phenomenon with Implications for the Theory of Abstract Cases’, unpublished ms., Institute for Nordic Languages, University of Lund, Sweden; revised version to appear in The Linguistic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik: 1972, A Grammar of Contemporary English, Seminar Press, New York; Longman Group Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van: 1983, ‘The Case of German Adjectives’, this volume. An earlier version appeared in J. Pustanowsky and V. Burke (eds.), Markedness and Learnability, U. Mass. Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6, pp. 148–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. R.: 1972, ‘The Category Squish: Endstation Hauptwort’, CLS 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, P.: 1977, ‘Constraints on Coordination’, Language 53, 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.: 1977, ‘Nonsources of Unpassives’, in J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 2, Seminar Press, New York, pp. 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, E.: 1976, Capturing the Adjective, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spevack, M.: 1973, The Harvard Concordance to Shakespeare, the Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatlock, J. S. P. and A. G. Kennedy: 1963, A Concordance to the Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, F.: 1963, A Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vol. I-IIIb, E. J. Brill, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waksberg, J.: 1977, ‘The Structure of Prepositional Phrases in the X-bar Theory’, unpublished ms., Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, T.: 1977, ‘Transformations and the Lexicon’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 327–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, T.: 1980, ‘Major and Minor Rules in Lexical Grammar’, in T. Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst and M. Moortgat (eds.), Lexical Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1980, ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1982, ‘Another Argument that Passive is Transformational’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maling, J. (1983). Transitive Adjectives: A Case of Categorial Reanalysis. In: Heny, F., Richards, B. (eds) Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles. Synthese Language Library, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6989-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6989-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6991-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6989-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics