Skip to main content

Armstrong’s Theory of Perception

  • Chapter
D.M. Armstrong

Part of the book series: Profiles ((PROF,volume 4))

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

Almost everything D. M. Armstrong published in the first decade of his publishing career (1954-1963) was about the philosophy of perception. Some of his most recent writings are also in this area. Although the first section of this essay, which discusses Armstrong’s purposes for distinguishing immediate from mediate perception and also provides an introduction to his central views about the nature of perception, begins by considering his first three books in the order of their publication, I will not persist in a chronological treatment of Armstrong’s writings nor attempt to survey his contributions item by item.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, D. M.: 1965, ‘A theory of perception’, in B. Wolman (ed.): Scientific Psychology (Basic Books, New York), pp. 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. M.: 1957, Perceiving: A Philosophical Study (Cornell University Press, Ithaca).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. and Pinkerton, R. J.: 1973, ‘On an argument against sensory items’, Mind 82,269–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F.: 1977, Perception: A Representative Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.: 1976, Problems from Locke (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1970, ‘Armstrong on the mind’, Philosophical Review 79, 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1974, ‘What is it like to be a bat?’ Philosophical Review 83, 435–450, reprinted in

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Nagel: 1979, Mortal Questions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge), pp. 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D. H.: 1966, ‘An examination of D. M. Armstrong’s theory of perception’, Ph. D. dissertation (Cornell University, Ithaca).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D. H.: 1976, ‘The primary objects of perception’, Mind 85, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D. H.: 1981, ‘Illusions and sense-data’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, K.: 1963, ‘The dispensability of perceptual inferences’, Mind 72, 357 -368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanford, D.H. (1984). Armstrong’s Theory of Perception. In: Bogdan, R.J. (eds) D.M. Armstrong. Profiles, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6280-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6280-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6282-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6280-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics