Skip to main content

Domestication

  • Chapter
Elements of Ethology

Abstract

Domestication has been defined by Rattner and Boice (1975) as the removal of organisms from some natural selective pressures over generations. However this definition is not entirely satisfactory for it could as easily apply to certain zoo animals as to animals that are conventionally considered to be domesticated. The latter fulfil a variety of functions for man and it is the conscious genetic selection for adaptation to these functions that today largely distinguishes domestic animals from the inmates of a modern zoo, which are also being protected from some pressures of natural selection that would operate in their natural habitats. Additionally most domestic animals are more docile than most zoo animals. However domestication must be distinguished from tameness, which is defined as the elimination of the tendency to flee in the presence of man. Tameness may be learnt through early association with man, e.g. imprinting of young animals on to man, or it might occur through lack of contact with man. Several species of animals on the Galapagos Islands do not flee from man, probably due to the fact that they have not been hunted. Furthermore, domestication can involve many different sorts of relationships with man, from the intimate relationship between a pet dog and its owner to the loose association found, say, on an ostrich farm or extensive sheep farm. In either event the species concerned is able to fulfil the goal desired by the owner and to breed successfully in the environment supplied by man. In some cases reproductive success is now completely dependent on man’s intervention, as in the case of the bulldog, the non-broody strains of fowl, and some broad breasted strains of turkeys in which the males are unable to copulate successfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

Experimental studies on the process of domestication (additional to those mentioned in the text).

  • Boice, R. (1977), Burrows of wild and albino rats: Effects of domestication, out-door raising, age, experience and maternal state, J. Camp. Physiol. Psychol., 91, 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, J.L. (1975), Genetic mechanisms controlling the domestication of a wild house mouse population (Mus. Musculus L.) J. Camp. Physiol. Psychol., 89, 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M.W. (1976), Effects of domestication on prey catching and killing in beagles, coyotes and F2 hybrids, App. Anim. Ethol., 2, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A.S. (1944), The nature of heritable wildness in Turkeys, Candor, 46, 133–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vines, G. (1981), Wolves in dog’s clothing, New Scientist, 91, 648–652.

    Google Scholar 

Domestic and feral populations in the wild.

  1. Hall, S.J.G. (1979), Studying the Chillingham wild cattle, Ark, 6, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McBride, G., Parer, I.P. and Foenander, F. (1969), The social organisation of feral domestic fowl, Anim. Behav. Monogr., 2, 125–181.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Duncan, I.J.H. and Savory, C.J. (1978), Observations on the social behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild, Biol. Behav., 3, 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feist, J.D. and McCullough, D.R. (1975), Reproduction in feral horses, J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl., 23, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feist, J.D. and McCullough, D.R. (1976), Behaviour patterns and communication in feral horses, Z. Tierpsychol., 41, 337–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tyler, S.J. (1972), The behaviour and social organisation of the New Forest Ponies, Anim. Behav. Monogr., 5, 85–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grubb, P. and Jewell, P.A. (1966), Social grouping and home range in Feral Soay sheep, Symp. Zool. Soc. Land., 18, 179–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 D.G.M. Wood-Gush

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wood-Gush, D.G.M. (1983). Domestication. In: Elements of Ethology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5931-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5931-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-23170-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5931-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics