Abstract
Among the reasons that make one choose a scientific vocation those which arise from processes of moral reflection seem to play but a minor role. Indeed, it would be surprising if the curriculum vitae of a prominent scientist would indicate differently concerning his scientific career. Research is almost exclusively professional nowadays, and usually professions have a secure social and cultural status long before we decide to enter one. Doing so, therefore, does not normally presuppose self-justification at all. Normally there is no-occasion to ask questions such as whether the contemplated move is permissible or forbidden or, perhaps, especially commendable. Generally, moral conscience is no party to the choice of a scientific vocation; not because science places us beyond good and evil, but because the scientific occupation can be taken up and practiced in the shelter of traditionally self-evident assumptions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lübbe, H. (1986). Scientific Practice and Responsibility. In: Doeser, M.C., Kraay, J.N. (eds) Facts and Values. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4454-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4454-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8482-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4454-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive