Skip to main content

A Note on Phinney

  • Chapter
Parameter Setting

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 4))

Abstract

In the context of the current interest in the explanatory role of parameters for language acquisition, it is interesting to speculate whether parameters are relevant only to first language (L1) acquisition or whether they can also explain aspects of non-primary language learning, particularly second language (L2) acquisition. I shall argue that the parametric approach to UG raises potentially interesting research questions for the L2 acquisition field, which I shall outline here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, W.: 1981, ‘PRO drop languages and non obligatory control’, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7, 46–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V.: 1985, ‘Universal grammar and second language learning’, Applied Linguistics 6, 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulay, H., M. Burt and S. Krashen: 1982, Language Two, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, S.: 1985, ‘Maturational aspects of universal grammar’, in A. Davies, C. Criper and A. Howatt (eds.), Interlanguage, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, S.: 1983, ‘Differences between first and second language acquisition’, in D. Rogers and J. Sloboda (eds.), Acquisition of Symbolic Skills, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, S.: 1984, ‘A universal in L2 acquisition based on a PBD typology’, in F. Eckman, L. Bell and D. Nelson (eds.), Universais of Second Language Acquisition, Newbury House, Rowley, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. and L. Selinker (eds.): 1983, Language Transfer in Language Learning, Newbury House, Rowley, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilles, S.: 1986, ‘Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter’, Second Language Research 2 , 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O.: 1982, Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kean, M.-L.: 1984, ‘Seond language acquisition and grammatical theory: A matter of projection and marking’, unpublished paper, Max-Planck-Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, R.: 1957, Linguistics Across Cultures, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazurkewich, I.: 1984, ‘The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory’, Language Learning 34, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Register, N.: 1984, ‘The pro-drop parameter and its implications for learners of second languages’, unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, K.: 1982, Syntactic Chains and the Definiteness Effect, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinker, L.: 1972, ‘Interlanguage’, IRAL 10, 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L.: 1984a, ‘Implications of parametric variation for adult second language learners: An investigation of the pro-drop parameter’, to appear in V. Cook (ed.), Experimental Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.: 1985a, ‘Universal grammar as a source of explanation in second language acquisition’, in B. Wheatley et al. (eds.), Current Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.: 1985b, ‘The “pro-drop” parameter in adult second language acquisition’, Language Learning 35, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L.: 1986, ‘Markedness and parameter setting: Some implications for a theory of adult second language acquisition’, in F. Eckman, E. Moravcsik and J. Wirth (eds.), Markedness, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobl, H.: 1983, ‘Markedness and the projection problem’, Language Learning 33, 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, L. (1987). A Note on Phinney. In: Roeper, T., Williams, E. (eds) Parameter Setting. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2316-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3727-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics