Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 23))

Abstract

Making sense of school testing programs nowadays is difficult for a variety of reasons. One aspect of testing in the nation’s schools nevertheless seems clear—the sheer volume of standardized testing is increasing. As Chris Popho wrote in 1985:

Testing is on the increase! Business for commercial test publishers is up and new companies are eyeing the market, ready to jump into a business that looks like it is firmly standing on the up escalator. Nearly every large education reform effort of the past few years has either mandated a new form of testing or expanded uses of existing testing. (Pipho 1985,19)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Grouse, J., 1985. Does the SAT help colleges make better selection decisions? Harvard Educational Review 55 (2): 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr-Bremme, D. W., and J. L. Herman. 1987. Assessing student achievement: A profile of classroom practices. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donlon, T. F., ed. 1984. The College Board technical handbook for the Scholastic Aptitude Test and Achievement Tests. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., and M. C. Ellwein. 1986. Reform by raising test standards. CRESST Evaluation Comment (December): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslin, D. 1967. Teachers and testing. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslin, D., R. R. Epstein, and B. A. Hallock. 1965. The use of standardized tests in elementary schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, W. 1984. Testing reasoning and reasoning about testing. Review of Educational Research 54 (4): 597–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, W. 1981. Validity, vaudeville, and values: A short history of social concerns over standardized testing. American Psychologist 36 (10): 1021–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, J., P. Runkel, and D. Damrin. 1961. Effects of use of tests by teachers trained in a summer institute. Urbana: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 002925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, J., P. Runkel, D. Damrin, R. Kane, and G. Larson. 1960. The use of test results. Urbana: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan, T., G. F. Madaus, and P. W. Airasian. 1982. The effects of standardized testing. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipho, C. 1985. Tracking the reforms. Part 5: Testing-Can it measure the success of the reform movement? Education Week (May 22): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radwin, E. 1981. A case study of New York City: Citywide reading testing program. Cambridge, MA: The Huron Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. 1984. Magnitude of teacher expectancy effects on pupil IQ as a function of the credibility of expectancy induction. Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (1): 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, D. 1981. Testing in America: A supportive environment. Phi Delta Kappan 62:625–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. 1981. Introduction: Research to inform a debate. Phi Delta Kappan 62:623–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., and L. Jacobsen. 1968. Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, H., J. Kelly, D. Wanous, W. Mehrens, C. Clark, and A. Porter. 1980. Integrating assessment with instruction. A review (1922–1980). East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon-Cox, L. 1981. Teachers and standardized tests: What’s really happening? Phi Delta Kappan 62:631–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhor, C. 1985. Objective tests and writing samples: How do they affect instruction in composition? Phi Delta Kappan 66:635–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L., and D. Zubrow. 1981. Standardized testing from the administrative perspective. Phi Delta Kappan 62:628–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haney, W.M. (1989). Making Sense of School Testing. In: Gifford, B.R. (eds) Test Policy and Test Performance: Education, Language, and Culture. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2500-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2500-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7628-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2500-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics