Abstract
Mathematical texts have a long pedigree, but while an examination of past texts gives a historical perspective, it cannot inform about the actual curriculum. The idea that student texts can be seen as a transposition of ‘real’ mathematical texts is discounted. Both visible features of text materials (such as the text itself, questions and answers, control structures, images) and pedagogic functions (such as addressing the teacher and learner, authorial stance and voice) are examined and their problematic nature revealed. Commercial and governmental constraints are briefly discussed; this is followed by a discussion on the use of text materials in class. A final section looks at possible future developments of textual materials in mathematics education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, J.: 1988, ‘Newspaper-based Mathematics for Adults in South Africa’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 19(1), 59–78.
Allenby, R.B.: 1983, Rings, Fields and Groups, Arnold, London.
Barthes, R.: 1984, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, Fontana, London.
Chevallard, Y.: 1985, La Transposition Didactique, La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble.
Davis, Z.: 1992, ‘Alternative Mathematics Materials: Panacea or Obstacle?’, in C. Breen and J. Coombe (eds), Transformations? The First Years of the Mathematics Education Project, Mathematics Education Project, Cape Town, SA, 1992, 18–37.
Davis, Z.: 1994, ‘Gender and Mathematical Ability in Understanding Mathematics 5’ in Z. Davis (ed.), Exploring Mathematics Teaching and Teacher Education, Mathematics Education Project, Rondebosch, SA, 1994, 126–136.
DES: 1987, Better Mathematics: Report of the Low Attainers in Mathematics Project, HMSO, London.
Desforges, C. & Cockburn, A.: 1987, Understanding the Mathematics Teacher: A Study of First Schools, Falmer, Lewes.
Dowling, P.: 1991a, ‘Gender, Class, and Subjectivity in Mathematics: a Critique of Humpty Dumpty’, For the Learning of Mathematics 11 (1), 2–8.
Dowling, P.: 1991b, ‘A Touch of Class: Ability, Social Class and Intertext in SMP 11–16’, in D. Pimm and E. Love (eds), Teaching and Learning School Mathematics, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1991, 137–152.
Dowling, P.: 1993, ‘A Language for the Sociological Description of Pedagogic Texts with Particular Reference to the Secondary School Mathematics Scheme SMP 11–16’, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, Institute of Education.
Eco, U.: 1979, The Role of the Reader, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Eco, U.: 1992, Interpretation and Overinterpretation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Erlwanger, S.H.: 1973, ‘Benny’s Conception of Rules and Answers in IPI Mathematics’, Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior 1 (2), 7–26.
Fauvel, J.: 1988, ‘Cartesian and Euclidean Rhetoric’, For the Learning of Mathematics 8(1), 25–29.
Fauvel, J. (ed.): 1990, History in the Mathematics Classroom: The IREMPapers, Vol. 1, Mathematical Association, Leicester.
Fauvel, J.: 1991, ‘Tone and the Teacher: Instruction and Complicity in Mathematics Textbooks’, in D. Pimm and E. Love (eds), Teaching and Learning School Mathematics, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1991, 111–121.
Fauvel, J.: forthcoming, Studies in Textbooks and Society,
Freudenthal, H.: 1986, ‘Review of Chevallard, Y., La Transposition Didactique’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 17 (4), 323–327.
Gerofsky, S.: 1996, ‘A Linquistic and Narrative View of Word Problems in Mathematics Education’, For the Learning of Mathematics, 16 (2), 36–45.
Goldenberg, E.P.: 1993, ‘On Building Curriculum Materials that Foster Problem Posing’, in S.I. Brown and M.I. Walter (eds), Problem Posing: Reflections and Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1993, 31–38.
Gray, E.: 1991, ‘The Primary Mathematics Textbook: Intermediary in the Cycle of Change’, in D. Pimm and E. Love (eds), Teaching and Learning School Mathematics, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1991, 122–136.
Grünbaum, B. & Shephard, G.C.: 1987, Tilings and Patterns, W.H. Freeman, New York.
HMI: 1989, Aspects of Primary Education: the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, HMSO, London.
Howson, G., Keitel, C. & Kilpatrick, J.: 1981, Curriculum Development in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IOWO: 1977, ‘Eleven Minutes Group Work – a Transcript’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 8 (4), 377–389.
Ivins, W.: 1969, Prints and Visual Communication, Da Capo Press, New York.
Kang, W. & Kilpatrick, J.: 1992, ‘Didactic Transposition in Mathematics Textbooks’, For the Learning of Mathematics 12 (1), 2–7.
Laborde, C: 1995, ‘Designing Tasks for Learning Geometry in a Computerbased Environment? The Case of Cabri-géomètre’, in L. Burton and B. Jaworski (eds), Technology in Mathematics Teaching, Chartwell-Bratt, London, 1995, 39–52.
Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations: the Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leapfrogs: 1975, Network, Hutchinson, London.
Leron, U.: 1985, ‘Heuristic Presentations: the Role of Structuring’, For the Learning of Mathematics 5 (3), 7–13.
Lodge, D.: 1995, Therapy, Seeker & Warburg, London.
Morgan, J.: 1977, Affective Consequences for the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics of an Individualised Learning Programme, DIME Projects, Department of Education, University of Stirling, Stirling.
Nelsen, R.B.: 1993, Proofs Without Words: Exercises in Visual Thinking, Mathematical Association of America, Washington.
Nunokawa, K.: 1994, ‘Improving Diagrams Gradually: one Approach to Using Diagrams in Problem Solving’, For the Learning of Mathematics 14(1), 34–38.
Otte, M.: 1983, ‘Textual Strategies’, For the Learning of Mathematics 3 (3), 15–28.
Otte, M.: 1986, ‘What is a Text?’, in B. Christiansen, A.G. Howson and M. Otte (eds), Perspectives on Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1986, 173–202.
Parzysz, B.: 1988, “Knowing’ vs ‘Seeing’: Problems of the Plane Representation of Space Geometry Figures”, Educational Studies in Mathematics 19(1), 79–92.
Pimm, D.: 1995, Symbols and Meanings in School Mathematics, Routledge, London.
Reynès, F.: 1990, ‘Géométrie ou Trahison des Dessins?’, Petit x 26, 73–75.
Shuard, H. & Rothery, A. (eds).: 1984, Children Reading Mathematics, John Murray, London.
Sierpinska, A.: 1995, review of Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 95/4, 111–119.
Spiro, R.J. et al.: 1987, ‘Knowledge Acquisition for Application: Cognitive Flexibility and Transfer in Complex Content Domains’, in B.K. Britton and S.M. McGlynn (eds), Executive Control Processes in Reading, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987, 177–200.
Sträßer, R.: 1991, Dessin et Figure: Géométrie et Dessin Technique a l’Aide de l’Ordinateur, Occasional Paper 128, Institut fur Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld.
Stray, C: 1994, ‘Paradigms Regained: Towards a Historical Sociology of the Textbook’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 26 (1), 1–29.
Tahta, D.: 1981, ‘Words, Images and Objects’, Mathematics Teaching 96, 34–37.
Thom, R.: 1973, ‘“Modern” Mathematics: Does it Exist?’, in A.G. Howson (ed.), Developments in Mathematical Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973, 194–209.
Turnau, S.: 1980, ‘The Mathematical Textbook for Young Students’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 11 (4), 393–410.
van Dormolen, J.: 1986, ‘Textual Analysis’, in B. Christiansen, A.G. Howson and M. Otte (eds), Perspectives on Mathematics Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1986, 141–171.
van Maanen, J.: 1991, ‘L’Hôpital’s Weight Problem’, For the Learning of Mathematics 11 (2), 44–47.
Wing, T.: 1985, ‘Reading Children Reading Mathematics’, Mathematics Teaching 111, 62–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Love, E., Pimm, D. (1996). ‘This is so’: a text on texts. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Laborde, C. (eds) International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7155-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1465-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive