Skip to main content

Intersecting Representation and Communication Infrastructures

  • Chapter
The SimCalc Vision and Contributions

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

  • 1097 Accesses

Abstract

We analyze the intersection of new forms of representation infrastructures in SimCalc MathWorlds® with the affordances of available communication infrastructures. We describe the fundamental design principles from a software and curriculum perspective of why these two infrastructures can be overlapped in educational environments for important and meaningful learning outcomes. The products of this intersection result in new modes of expression (in terms of gesture, deixis and informal/formal registers), classroom identity formation in mathematically meaningful ways, and pedagogy in terms of activity structure and intentionality.

This work is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant REC-0337710 and the Institute of Education Sciences at the US Department of Education under grant R305B070430. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of these agencies.

Originally published in ZDM: The International Journal in Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0191-7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    By affordance we mean a quality of an object, or an environment, that allows an individual to perform an action. We thank one of our reviewers for offering us a succinct and meaningful definition.

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays (trans: Emerson, & C., Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school: expanded edition. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. A. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: the development of human consciousness. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1999). Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourse (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., Dalton, S., Cambridge, L., & Davis, G. (2006). Patterns of participation in networked classrooms. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 257–264). Prague, Czech Republic: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., & Penuel, W. (2008). Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Special Issue of Educational Studies in Mathematics: Democratizing Access to Mathematics Through Technology—Issues of Design and Implementation, 68(2), 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2003). The new sciences of learning: active learning, metacognition, and transfer of knowledge in e-learning applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1991). Notations and representations as mediators of constructive processes. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism and mathematics education (pp. 53–74). Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Dynamics of negation in the identity politics of cultural other and cultural self. Culture and Psychology, 1(3), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W., & Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics and virtual culture: an evolutionary perspective on technology and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 97–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, W. (2003). Understanding qualitative calculus: a structural synthesis of learning research. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(2), 167–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: a dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. (1999). Learning through participatory simulations: network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ’99) conference, Stanford University, 12–15 December, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. (2000). Networked gridlock: students enacting complex dynamic phenomena with the HubNet architecture. In Proceedings of the fourth annual international conference of the learning sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 715–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Hegedus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hegedus, S., Moreno-Armella, L. (2013). Intersecting Representation and Communication Infrastructures. In: Hegedus, S., Roschelle, J. (eds) The SimCalc Vision and Contributions. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5696-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics