Abstract
Our shared agenda was, and still is, that of working with governments, nongovernment organizations and educators throughout the world to ensure that all children are provided with an education that is effective, relevant and of high quality. But what is an effective, relevant, high-quality education? The question itself is value laden: how it is answered reflects one’s values and philosophy of education. While education systems do vary in terms of approach and emphasis, there is general agreement about the overall purposes of education. These are set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on Discrimination in Education and are enshrined in the constitution and legislation of most nations. As Article 26 of the Universal Declaration insists, “Everyone has the right to education…” which is to be “free” and “compulsory in the elementary stages”. The declaration and conventions go on to specify the aims of education, thus to indicate the criteria by which the effectiveness, quality and relevance of education are to be judged (Power, UNESCO’s response to the challenge of creating unity in diversity. In: Campbell J (ed.) Creating our common future, UNESCO/Berghahn Books, Paris, 2001; Soc Alternatives, 24(2), 13–18, 2005).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Connors, L. (2011). Putting fairness back on the agendas.Professional Educator, 10(2), 3–4.
Maclean, R. (Ed.). (2007).Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century Festschift for Professor Phillip Hughes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Power, C. (2001). UNESCO’s response to the challenge of creating unity in diversity. In J. Campbell (Ed.)Creating our Common Future. Paris: UNESCO/Berghahn Books.
Power, C. (2005). Quo vadis? Education for what purpose?Social Alternatives, 24(2), 13–18.
Power, C. (2009, November).Addressing UN Millennium Development Goals. Keynote address, ANZCIES Conference, Armidale.
Power, C. N. (2007). Achieving universal primary education and EIU.Journal of Education for International Understanding, 3, 106–128.
Power, C. N., & Wood, R. (1984). National assessment: A review of programs in Australia, United Kingdom and United States.Comparative Education Review, 28(3), 355–377.
Sachs, J. (2005).The End of Poverty. London: Penguin Books.
Sen, A. (2007).Civil paths to peace. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
UNESCO. (1996).Learning: The treasure within. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2009).EFA Monitoring Report 2009. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2010).EFA Global Monitoring Report 2010. Paris: UNESCO.
WDEFA. (1990).Declaration and framework for action. Paris: UNESCO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Power, C. (2013). A High-Quality Education for All. In: Hughes, P. (eds) Achieving Quality Education for All. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5294-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5294-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5293-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5294-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)