Skip to main content

Thoughts on the Translation of Husserl’s Ideen, Erstes Buch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Husserl’s Ideen

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 66))

  • 1159 Accesses

Abstract

There are two parts to this essay. The first part, §§1–3, traces the genesis of my translation of Ideen I. The second part, §§4–5, sketches the gist of what the author learned from the study of Ideen I, including the realization that Husserl’s “phenomenological ‘idealism’” does not exclude a “phenomenological realism.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Book I, trans. Frederick Kersten (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1983).

  2. 2.

    See Herbert Spiegelberg, “How Subjective is Phenomenology?” Essays in Phenomenology, ed., Maurice Natanson (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966), 138.

  3. 3.

    See ibid., pp. 138 f. for the “peculiar phenomenological realism” they develop.

  4. 4.

    A bibliography as well as brief reviews of these Yearbook essays can be found in Herbert Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction, Third Revised and Enlarged Edition, with the Collaboration of Karl Schuhmann (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982).

  5. 5.

    Wilhelm Schapp, Beiträge zur Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung (Göttingen: W. Fr. Kaestner, 1910).

  6. 6.

    Heinrich Hofmann, “Untersuchungen über den Empfindungsbegriff,” Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie XXVI (1913): 1–135.

  7. 7.

    José Ortega y Gasset, “Sobre el concpeto de sensación,” Obras Completas, Vol. 1, (Madrid: Reviste de Occidente, 1950), 245–261. This essay was originally published in 1913.

  8. 8.

    Theodor Conrad, Zur Wesenslehre des psychischen Lebens und Erleben (Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968).

  9. 9.

    Herbert Leyendecker, Zur Phänomenologie der Täuschungen (Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1913).

  10. 10.

    Cf. Herbert Spiegelberg, “How Subjective is Phenomenology?” loc. cit., pp. 140 ff.

  11. 11.

    Paul Natorp, “Husserl’s ‘Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie,’” Logos VII (1917/18): 224–246; Georg Misch, Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie. Eine Auseinandersetzung der Dilthey’schen Richtung mit Heidegger und Husserl (Berlin and Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1931). For a discussion of Natorp and Husserl, see Fred Kersten, “The Occasion and Novelty of Husserl’s Phenomenology of Essence,” Essays in Honor of Herbert Spiegelberg, Philip Bossert ed. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975), 61–92.

  12. 12.

    Eugen Fink, “Die phänomenologische Philosophie Edmund Husserls in der gegenwärtigen Kritik,” Kant-Studien 38 (1933): 319–383. (English translation in The Phenomenology of Husserl. Selected Critical Readings, R.O. Elveton ed. (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970), 73–145. Elveton’s Introduction discusses the various criticisms of Husserl’s “idealism” by Husserl’s contemporaries (e.g., Reinach, Conrad-Martius).

  13. 13.

    Roderick M. Chisholm, Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press of Glencoe, Illinois, 1960).

  14. 14.

    E.B. Holt. W.T. Marvin, W.P. Montague, R.B. Perry, W.B. Pitkin, E.G. Spaulding.

  15. 15.

    See the exchange between Calvin Schrag and Herbert Spiegelberg in The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, II., No. 3 (October, 1980): 281 ff.; and Theodor Celms, Der phänomenologische Idealismus Husserls (Riga: Acta Universitatis Latviensis, XIX, 1928), Chapter VI.

  16. 16.

    Edmund Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen II, 1 (Halle a.d. S: Max Niemeyer, 1928), 17 ff.; English translation, Vol. I, trans. J. N. Findlay (New York: The Humanities Press, 1970), 261.

  17. 17.

    Ideen I, §1.

  18. 18.

    See Husserl, Ideas, I, loc. Cit., §§2–7, 15 ff. Theoretical sciences in the natural attitude include the Geisteswissenschaften and Kulturwissenschaften in so far as they are experiential sciences in the ordinary sense.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Kersten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kersten, F. (2013). Thoughts on the Translation of Husserl’s Ideen, Erstes Buch . In: Embree, L., Nenon, T. (eds) Husserl’s Ideen. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 66. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5213-9_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics