Skip to main content

The Open Future and Its Exploitation by Rational Agents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Around the Tree

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 361))

  • 641 Accesses

Abstract

Branching along the time dimension provides a dynamic, four-dimensional, treelike space-time structure that explains many features of the physical world. The list includes temporal asymmetry and directionality, time flow and the existence of “now,” physical versus logical possibility, the openness of the future, quantum probabilities, and superpositional collapse. This chapter discusses these and how agents use the open future in order to act intelligently and rationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    McCall (1994) contains a detailed account of the branching space-time model discussed here. Belnap (1992) and Belnap et al. (2001) introduce a similar model, the details of which differ from McCall’s. The two models bear only a superficial resemblance to the Everett-Wheeler many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.

  2. 2.

    For an account of how branch attrition in the model corresponds to the flow of time, see McCall (1976, 1984, 1994, 1997).

  3. 3.

    Concerning the concepts of physical possibility and physical necessity, see McCall (1969).

  4. 4.

    Decenary trees are described in McCall (1994), pp. 88–92.

  5. 5.

    See McCall (1995b, 2000a, b).

  6. 6.

    McCall (1987, 1999, 2008) and McCall and Lowe (2005).

  7. 7.

    Branching space-time does in fact allow for particular instances of 100% determinism, in cases where all the branches above an A node are B branches. For example, in all instances where the two ends of a copper wire are connected to a battery, current flows in the wire.

  8. 8.

    McCall (2009), pp. 146–48 and McCall (forthcoming).

References

  • Belnap, N.D. 1992. Branching space-time. Synthese 92: 385–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N.D., M. Perloff, and Ming Xu. 2001. Facing the future. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A. 1963. Philosophical problems of space and time. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. 1958. Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a physical world. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 1969. Time and the physical modalities. The Monist 55: 426–446. Repr. Freeman and Sellars, eds. 1971. Basic issues in the philosophy of time, 102–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 1976. Objective time flow. Philosophy of Science 43: 337–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 1984. A dynamic model of temporal becoming. Analysis 44: 172–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 1987. Decision. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17: 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 1994. A model of the universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 1997. Time flow, non-locality, and measurement in quantum mechanics. In Time’s arrows today, ed. S. Savitt, 155–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 1999. Deliberation reasons and explanation reasons. In Language, logic, and concepts, ed. Jackendoff, Bloom, and Wynn, 97–108. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 2000a. QM and STR: The combining of quantum mechanics and relativity theory. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 67: S535–S548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 2000b. Towards a Lorentz-invariant theory of collapse. In Physical interpretations of relativity theory VII proceedings. ed. M.C. Duffy and M. Wegener, Hadronic Press, Florida, 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 2008. How to make a decision. In Actions, rationality and decision, ed. D. Vanderveken and D. Fisette, Cahiers de Logique et d’Epistemologie, Vol 6, 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. 2009. Contribution to J.H. Aguilar and A.A. Buckareff, ed. Philosophy of action: 5 questions, New York, Automatic Press, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. (forthcoming) Controlled indeterministic processes in action theory. In Attitudes and action in discourse, ed. D. Vanderveken, Also on http://www.ucl.ac.uk/∼uctytho/

  • McCall, S., and E.J. Lowe. 2005. Indeterminist free will. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 681–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. 2004. Mind: A brief introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. 1964. Deliberation and foreknowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly 1: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Storrs McCall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCall, S. (2013). The Open Future and Its Exploitation by Rational Agents. In: Correia, F., Iacona, A. (eds) Around the Tree. Synthese Library, vol 361. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5167-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics