Abstract
Monitoring, surveillance and recording are all activities concerned with the collection and management of information. They are an indispensable and integral component of management planning: without information there can be no planning. ‘Survey’ is simply making a single observation to measure and record something. ‘Surveillance’ is repeating standardised surveys in order that change can be detected. This is quite different to, but often confused with, monitoring. Surveillance is used to detect change but does not differentiate between acceptable and unacceptable change. ‘Monitoring’ is surveillance undertaken to ensure that formulated standards are being maintained. Monitoring should be an essential and integral component of management planning: there can be no planning without monitoring and no monitoring without planning. There should be a direct relationship between the accuracy of the conditions that management can deliver and the level of accuracy that a monitoring project is designed to measure. The development of any monitoring strategy should be based on the availability of resources and on a risk assessment. ‘Recording’ is concerned with making a permanent and accessible record of significant activities (including management), events and anything else that has relevance to the site. Recording management activities must be given the highest priority: if something is worth doing it must be worth recording. Recording is an expensive activity, and it must be planned with exactly the same rigour as all other aspects of reserve management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An objective is, or should be, the description of something that we want to achieve. These are the outcomes of management. Wildlife outcomes are habitats, communities or populations at a favourable status.
- 2.
An attribute is a characteristic of a feature that can be monitored to provide evidence about the condition of the feature.
- 3.
A factor is anything that has the potential to influence or change a feature, or to affect the way in which a feature is managed. These influences may exist, or have existed, at any time in the past, present or future.
References
Alexander, M. (1996). A Guide to the Production of Management Plans for Nature Conservation and Protected Areas. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.
Eagles, P. F. J., McCool, S. F. and Haynes, C. D. A. (2002). Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: Guidelines for Planning and Management. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
Eurosite (1999). Toolkit for Management Planning. Eurosite, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Eurosite (2003). Ecological Monitoring of Protected Natural Areas – Providing Guidance and Best Practice. Eurosite, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Farrell, T. A. and Marion, J. L. (2002). The Protected Area Visitor Impact Management (PAVIM) Framework: A Simplified Process for Making Management Decisions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10(1). Portland Press Ltd. London, UK.
Graefe, A., Kuss, F. R., Vaske, J. J. (1990). Visitor Impact Management: The Planning Framework. National Parks and Conservation Association. Washington, DC, USA.
Hockings, M., Stolton, S. and Dudley, N. (2000). A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
Hurford, C. and Schneider, M. (eds.). (2006). Monitoring Nature Conservation in Cultural Habitats. Springer, The Netherlands.
JNCC (1998). A Statement on Common Standards Monitoring. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
Keller, G. (1999). Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas. IUCN Gland, Switzerland.
Manning, R. E., Lime, D. W., Hof, M. and Freimund, W. A. (1995). The Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) Process. The George Wright Forum 12(3).
Margoluis, R. and Salafsky, N. (1998). Measures of Success: Designing, Managing, and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects. Island Press, Washington, DC.
McCool, S. F. (1996). A Framework for Managing National Protected Areas: Experiences from the United States. Maritime Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
McCool, S. F. and Cole, D. N. (1998). Proceedings – Limits of Acceptable Change and Related Planning Processes: Progress And Future Directions; 1997 Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-371. Ogden, UT, USA.
NCC (1983). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.
NCC (1988). Site Management Plans for Nature Conservation, A Working Guide. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.
Noss, R. F., O’Connell, M. A. and Murphy, D. D. (1997). The Science of Conservation Planning, Habitat Conservation Under the Endangered Species Act. Island press, Washington, DC, USA.
PONT (2007). Grazing animals constraints report. Unpublished internal document, PONT, Brecon Wales, UK.
Ratti, T. R. and Garton, E. O. (1994). Research and Experimental Design – contribution 565, University of Idaho Forestry, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Idaho, USA.
Rose, P. and McLean, I. (2003). The Future Role of JNCC in Biological Surveillance and Monitoring. JNCC, Peterborough, UK.
Stankey, G. H., McCool, S. F. and Stokes, G. L. (1984). Limits of Acceptable Change: A new framework for managing the Bob Marshall Wilderness. Western Wildlands, 10(3), 33–37
Thomas, L. and Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas. IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alexander, M. (2013). Survey, Surveillance, Monitoring & Recording. In: Management Planning for Nature Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5116-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5116-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5115-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5116-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)