Skip to main content

Reflections on the Universality of Human Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Universalism of Human Rights

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 16))

Abstract

It is difficult to define universality. It is a complex concept which incorporates geographic, cultural, historical and political dimensions (Solomon Islands, Chap. 6). As yet there is no generally accepted notion of universality of human rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Poland, Chap. 20.

  2. 2.

    See also Brazil, Chap. 5 (“universalism of confluence”).

  3. 3.

    See USA, Chap. 2.

  4. 4.

    See Germany, Chap. 15.

  5. 5.

    See Hungary, Chap. 22; Japan, Chap. 7.

  6. 6.

    ECJ, Case 11/70, Rep.1970, 1125.

  7. 7.

    Netherlands, Chap. 14.

  8. 8.

    See Netherlands, Chap. 14; Great Britain, Chap. 11; Portugal, Chap. 18; Ukraine, Chap. 24; Slovakia, Chap. 19; Solomon Islands, Chap. 6.

  9. 9.

    See Taiwan, Chap. 9.

  10. 10.

    See also Netherlands, Chap. 14; Taiwan, Chap. 9; Russia, Chap. 10.

  11. 11.

    See USA, Chap. 2.

  12. 12.

    See Arnold (2006, 41–45).

  13. 13.

    See Slovakia, Chap. 19; Portugal, Chap. 18.

  14. 14.

    See Great Britain, Chap. 11.

  15. 15.

    See Italy, Chap. 16.

  16. 16.

    See Poland, Chap. 20.

  17. 17.

    See also Portugal, Chap. 18; Slovakia, Chap. 19.

  18. 18.

    Netherlands, Chap. 14.

  19. 19.

    Ibid.

  20. 20.

    Poland, Chap. 20 (‘general incorporation’).

  21. 21.

    R v Secretary of State for Transport (ex parte Factortame) [1990] 2/AC 85, [1991] 1/AC 603.

  22. 22.

    FFC vol. 37, 271.

  23. 23.

    FFC vol. 73, 339.

  24. 24.

    FFC judgment of June 30, 2009 see: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208en.html (English translation).

  25. 25.

    FCC vol. 101, 361.

  26. 26.

    FCC vol. 111, 307; see Germany, Chap. 15.

  27. 27.

    See also Hungary, Chap. 22.

  28. 28.

    No. 45036/98 (complaint), Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 2006, 197.

  29. 29.

    See also Ukraine, Chap. 24.

  30. 30.

    See USA, Chap. 2.

  31. 31.

    See also Hungary, Chap. 22.

  32. 32.

    See Ukraine, Chap. 24; Portugal, Chap. 18.

  33. 33.

    Great Britain, Chap. 11(“equal moral worth”); Portugal, Chap. 18; Ukraine, Chap. 24; Slovakia, Chap. 19.

  34. 34.

    See USA, Chap. 2.

  35. 35.

    See also Russia. Chap. 10.

  36. 36.

    Germany, Chap. 15.

  37. 37.

    See also Slovakia, Chap. 19; Great Britain, Chap. 11.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Arnold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnold, R. (2013). Reflections on the Universality of Human Rights. In: Arnold, R. (eds) The Universalism of Human Rights. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4510-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics