Abstract
Shedding refers to the whole experience that occurs within a men’s shed program. A transactional view of shedding at the Berry Men’s Shed reveals the human and material transformations that occur as well as the resultant individual and community benefits. Understanding shedding from a transactional perspective highlights the complexity and multidimensional nature of shedding. Shedding involves more than just doing. It involves doing with others and doing for others. Moreover, a transactional view of the Berry Men’s Shed demonstrates the valuable contributions of community-based, occupation-focused programs and the importance of opportunities for such programs to be developed organically. Such understandings are not gained when a view of occupation is too individualistic or when interrelations between person and context rather than their holistic transactions are studied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A thicknesser is also known as a thickness planer used to create boards that are of an even thickness throughout their length and flat on both surfaces.
- 2.
A pracademic is someone who is both an academic and an active practitioner in their subject area.
References
Aldrich, R. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behaviors. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 147–156.
Ballinger, M., Talbot, L., & Verrinder, G. (2009). More than a place to do woodwork: A case study of a community-based men’s shed. Journal of Men’s Health, 6(1), 20–27.
Berry Men’s Shed. (nd). http://www.berrymensshed.com.au/. Accessed 31 Dec 2010.
Cutchin, M. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation –to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 303–312.
Cutchin, M., & Dickie, V. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In C. Hocking & G. Whiteford (Eds.), Critical perspectives on occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). London: Wiley.
Cutchin, M., Dickie, V., & Humphry, R. (2006). Transaction versus interpretation, or transaction and interpretation? A response to Michael Barber. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 97–99.
Cutchin, M., Aldrich, R., Bailliard, A., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewy and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 157–165.
Darby, T. (2007, September 7). Berry Men’s Shed. Paper presented at 2nd Men’s Shed conference, Manly, Australia.
Dickie, V., Cutchin, M., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 83–93.
Earle, L., Earle, T., & Von Mering, O. (1995). Sheds and male retirement: The place to go. Australasian Leisure for Pleasure Journal, 1(1), 5–19.
Erikson, E. (1981). On generativity and identity. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 249–269.
Golding, B. (2006, April 19–21 ). A profile of men’s sheds in Australia: patterns, purposes, profiles and experiences of participants: Some implications for ACE and VET about engaging older men. Paper presented at Australian Vocational Educational and Training Research Association conference, University of Wollongong, Wollongong.
Golding, B. (2008, July 14–17). Common wealth through community men’s sheds: Lives and learning networks beyond work. Paper presented at Pan Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, University of London, England.
Golding, B., Brown, M., Foley, A., Harvey, J., & Gleeson, L. (2007). Men’s sheds in Australia: learning through community contexts, NCVER, Adelaide, South Australia, 2007. www.ncver.edu.au/publications/1780.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2010.
Hayes, R., & Williamson, M. (2005, November 10–11). Preliminary evidence-based, best-practice guidelines for Victorian Men’s Sheds. Paper presented to Men’s Shed conference, Lakes Entrance, VIC.
Hayes, R., & Williamson, M. (2006). Evidence-based, best-practice guidelines for Victorian Men’s Sheds. Prepared for the Office of Senior Victorians, the School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC.
Jonsson, H. (2000). Anticipating, experiencing and valuing the transition from worker to retiree: A longitudinal study of retirement as an occupational transition. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute.
Malpage, J., Wicks, A., & Martin, K. (2008). Photo essay: Meaningful occupation at the Berry Men’s Shed. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 194–195.
Oldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place. New York: Marlowe & Company.
Salt, B. (2001). The big shift: Welcome to the third Australian culture. South Yarra: Hardie Grant.
Shoalhaven City Council. (nd). http://www.shoalhaven.nsw.gov.au/region/econodev/geninfo.htm. Accessed 31 Dec 2010.
Thomson, M. (1995). Blokes and sheds. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.
Thomson, M. (2002). The complete blokes and sheds. Pymble: HarperCollins.
Wicks, A. (2010, May 4–7). Doing things for others with others: How the Berry Men’s Shed promotes social participation of older men and social capital in a rural community. Paper presented at the World Federation of Occupational Therapists Congress, Santiago, Chile.
Wiseman, R. (2010). Berry Men’s Shed Newsletter: February. Berry: Berry Men’s Shed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wicks, A. (2013). A Transactional View of Shedding at the Berry Men’s Shed. In: Cutchin, M., Dickie, V. (eds) Transactional Perspectives on Occupation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4428-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4429-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)