Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of the Science Textbooks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks

Abstract

Textbooks are important sources from which students obtain knowledge. The inadequate and inconsistent scientific knowledge presented in science textbooks can negatively affect students’ conceptions. Different learning theories should be applied when preparing educational material, especially textbooks. Research shows that an adequate combination of both, visual and verbal, aspects of presenting science concepts is ideal. Visual-verbal learning allows students to reconcile the two modes and compare carefully the information available in the picture with the explanation in the text. Research also shows that around 90 % of students learn science using some form of text, but important conclusions are that science texts do not significantly contribute to quality learning in science education. Science textbooks demand that the learner integrates quite complicated science concepts, together with language abilities (scientific vocabulary and syntax and also capability of reading, writing and oral communicating), visualisation materials (different images, symbols, comic-strip style, etc.) and format in the science text. This chapter also focuses on the analysis of the data gathering techniques and instruments which are used in the qualitative research, especially the text analyse, which is the basis for the in-depth science textbook content analysis. A special emphasis of this chapter is also to present the criteria which serve the purpose of finding out the quality of teaching material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adadan, E., & Savasci, F. (2011). An analysis of 16–17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, (accepted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahtineva, A. (2005). Textbook analysis in the service of chemistry teaching. Universitas Scientiarum, 10, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ametller, J., & Pinto, R. (2002). Students’ reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. (1992). The ethnography of a medical setting: Reading, writing and rhetoric. Qualitative Health Research, 2(4), 451–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings, E. M. H., & Klanderman, D. (2000). Graphical representations of speed: Obstacles in preservice K-8 teachers experience. School Science and Mathematics, 100(8), 440–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, K. S. (2003). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, D. M., & Gabel, D. (2002). Differential effects in the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 911–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, G. S., Silva, R., & ClĂ©ment, P. (2005). Historical analysis of Portuguese primary school textbooks (1920–2005) on the topic of digestion. A paper presented at the International History, Philosophy, Sociology & Science Teaching conference IHPST 2005, Leeds. Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://www.ihpst2005.leeds.ac.uk/papers.htm

  • Clifford, P. (2002). The pressure-flow hypothesis of phloem transport: misconceptions in the A-level textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 36(3), 110–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constable, H., Campbell, B., & Brown, R. (1988). Sectional drawings from science textbooks: An experimental investigation into pupils’ understanding. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. (2008). Students’ comprehension of science concepts depicted in textbook illustrations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPI Quality criteria for teaching materials. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.cpi.si/en/

  • Davidowitz, B., Chittleborough, G., & Murray, E. (2010). Student-generated submicro diagrams: A useful tool for teaching and learning chemical equations and stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Berg, K. (2012). A study of first-year chemistry students’ understanding of solution concentration at the tertiary level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devetak, I. (2005). Explaining the latent structure of understanding submicropresentations in science. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & GlaĹľar, S. A. (2009). Assessing 16-year-old students’ understanding of aqueous solution at submicroscopic level. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & GlaĹľar, S. A. (2010). States of matter explanations in Slovenian textbooks for students aged 6 to 14. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn about? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Chemical inscriptions in Korean textbooks: Semiotics of macro- and microworld. Science Education, 90(2), 173–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. School Science Review, 64(227), 377–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. M., & Jones, L. L. (2008). Investigating students’ ability to transfer ideas learned from molecular animations of the dissolution process. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(2), 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KovaÄŤ, M., & KovaÄŤ Ĺ ebart, M. (2004). UÄŤbeniki v postsocialistiÄŤnih drĹľavah: nastavki za primerjalno analizo. KnjiĹľnica, 48(3), 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • KovaÄŤ, M., KovaÄŤ Ĺ ebart, M., Krek, J., Ĺ tefanc, D., & Vidmar, T. (2005). UÄŤbeniki in druĹľba znanja. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta. Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete. Univerza v Ljubljani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations. Educational Communication and Technology, 30(4), 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • MartĂ­nez-Gracia, M. V., Gil-QuĂ­lez, M. J., & Osada, J. (2006). Analysis of molecular genetics content in Spanish secondary school textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, G., & Johnson, P. (2005). Do particle ideas help or hinder pupils’ understanding of phenomena? International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1299–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A., & Gates, S. (2000). Newly qualified primary teachers’ perceptions of the role of text material in teaching science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 18(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. J., Briggs, N., & Beveridge, M. (1983). The effect of pictures upon the readability of a school science topic. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing text, talk and interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L., & Roseman, J. (2004). Can middle school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’ curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianidou, F., Ormerod, F., & Ogborn, J. (2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures about energy and pupils’ readings of them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svetlik, K., Japelj Pavešić, B., Kozina, A., RoĹľman, M., & Ĺ teblaj, M. (2008). Naravoslovni doseĹľki Slovenije v raziskavi, TIMSS 2007. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasu, E. S., & Howe, A. C. (1989). The effect of visual and verbal modes of representation on children’s retention of images and words. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(5), 401–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogrinc, J. (2005). The use of triangulation in the methodology of qualitative research. In B. KoĹľuh (Ed.), Measurement and assessment in educational and social research (pp. 241–249). Exeter: University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H-C. A. (1998). Science textbook studies reanalysis: Teachers “friendly” content analysis methods? A paper presented at the annual meeting of NARST, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva pl. 16, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia

    Iztok Devetak & Janez Vogrinc

Authors
  1. Iztok Devetak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janez Vogrinc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iztok Devetak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Murray Street 78, Perth, WA 6000, Australia

    Myint Swe Khine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J. (2013). The Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of the Science Textbooks. In: Khine, M. (eds) Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation