Skip to main content

Preparing Teachers as Informed Professionals: Working with a Critical Ethnographic Disposition and a Socially Democratic Imaginary

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Voices in Teacher Education

Part of the book series: Explorations of Educational Purpose ((EXEP,volume 22))

Abstract

The argument of this chapter is that the current neoliberal framing of education policy promotes teaching and learning as technical, managed processes that occur within the black box of the school in a functionalist, transmission model of education. Teacher educators and student teachers, as well as teachers, pupils and schools, have been caught up in the process of reducing students to sets of hollow numbers through a management paradigm of accountability and measurement. This situation is eroding the status and autonomy of the education profession. If education is to be socially responsible and equitable, the argument continues, it must be inclusive of the lives and cultures of the most disadvantaged students and their communities. Student teachers need to understand, therefore, that teaching is a political act and that one way of becoming an informed professional is through the processes of critical enquiry and critical pedagogy that takes account of the knowledge, norms, cultures, assets and resources that young people bring with them to school. The remainder of the chapter develops the radical potential of the concept of ‘funds of knowledge’ for informing pre-service teacher education and developing an ethnographic understanding of what is valued in homes and communities compared with what is typically valued (implicitly and explicitly) in schools. Through critical reflection and enquiry, the chapter concludes, student teachers can examine structural arrangements that position certain students and their communities ‘other’ and begin to formulate emancipatory social and educational practices that keep alive a pedagogy of hope and a politics of social justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. (Ed.). (2009). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary review. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2001). Educating the ‘right’ way. New York: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1997). Good schools/bad schools: Paradox and fabrication. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(3), 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2006). Education policy and social class. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2008). The education debate. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomé, L. (2007). Critical pedagogy and teacher education: Radicalizing prospective teachers. In P. McLaren & J. Kinchloe (Eds.), Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? (pp. 263–286). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottery, M. (1999). Please confirm the modified journal title for Bottery (1999). Global forces, national mediations and the management of educational institutions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 27(3), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowe, R., Ball, S., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Hartnett, A. (1996). Education and the struggle for democracy. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of research of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 602–649). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2001). Empowering minority students: A framework for introduction (classic reprint). Harvard Education Review, 71(4), 649–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2008). The continuing politics of mistrust: Performance management and the erosion of professional work. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (1985). Towards emancipation in citizenship education: The case of Afro-American cultural knowledge. Theory and Research in Social Education, 12(4), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (2008). Response to Chapter 3. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education (pp. 45–48). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S., & Gouthro, P. (2011). Teaching resistant novice educators to be critically reflective. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D., & Henderson, J. (2011). Contesting global neo-liberalism and creating alternative futures. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchloe, J. (2004). Critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, A. (2011). Shoving our way into young people’s lives. Teacher Development, 15(1), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, P. (2009). Towards a critical pedagogy of engagement for alienated youth: Insights from Freire and school-based research. Critical Studies in Education, 50(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2000). What is it to be critical? Teaching a critical approach to management undergraduates. Management Learning, 31(2), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect schools and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordtveit, B. (2010). Towards post-globalisation? On the hegemony of western education and development discourses. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(3), 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, L., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing educational field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 257–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation-building state changes its mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., Angus, L., Down, B., & McInerney, P. (2009). Activist and socially critical school and community renewal: Social justice in exploitative times. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). Cultures of democracy and citizen efficacy. Public Culture, 19(1), 117–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P., Hall, C., & Jones, K. (2010). Maggie’s day: A small-scale analysis of English education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. (2005). The anatomy of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 20(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. Please provide in‐text citation for the following reference: Willis (1977). (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. Westmead, UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Angus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Angus, L. (2012). Preparing Teachers as Informed Professionals: Working with a Critical Ethnographic Disposition and a Socially Democratic Imaginary. In: Down, B., Smyth, J. (eds) Critical Voices in Teacher Education. Explorations of Educational Purpose, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3974-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics