Skip to main content

Site Assessment and Characterization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Phytoremediation of Contaminated Groundwater
  • 1725 Accesses

Abstract

The applied use of plant and groundwater interactions (as described in Part I) to achieve remediation goals at sites characterized by contaminated groundwater is a direct extension of these long-observed natural interactions. The specific application of plants to achieve remedial goals is, however, relatively new. The installation of plants at sites to affect the flow of contaminated groundwater in response to regulatory-driven site-restoration mandates was initiated in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Relative to the total number of sites in the United States that have documented groundwater contamination and require some type of corrective action, the number of published case studies of phytoremediation that specifically addresses groundwater flow issues is few. In most cases at sites characterized by contaminated groundwater, the chosen corrective action involves conventional pump-and-treat of contaminated groundwater or groundwater flow interception by trenching. This is despite the efforts made by various state and federal regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), as well as other federal agencies, to promote phytoremediation as an alternative corrective action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Taylor, M. R., & Simon, E. J. (2006). Biology–Concepts and Connections. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, R. L., Malik, M., Li, Y. M., Brown, S. L., Bewer, E. P., Angle, J. S., & Baker, A. J. M. (1997). Phytoremediation of soil metals. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 8, 279–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle, F. H. (1993). Groundwater microbiology and geochemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 424 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S. D., & Ow, D. W. (1996). Promises and prospects of phytoremediation. Plant Physiology, 110, 715–719.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, H. P. G. (1856). Les Fountaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon. Paris, France: Victon Dalmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. S. 1991. Keynote speech: A brief overview of plant toxicity testing. In: J. W. Gorsuch, W. R. Lower, W. Wang, M. A. Lewis (Eds.), Plants for toxicity assessment: Second volume (ASTM STP 1115, pp. 5–11). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatliff, E. G. (1994, Summer). Vegetative remediation process offers advantages over traditional pump-and-treat technologies. Remediation, 4, 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haitjema, H. M., & Mitchell-Bruker, S. (2005). Are water tables a subdued replica of the topography? Groundwater, 43, 781–786.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harr, J. (1995). Civil Action. New York: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, R. W., Winter, T. C., LaBaugh, J. W., Franke, O. L. (2007). Water budgets: Foundations for effective water-resources and environmental management (U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1308, 90p.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hruska, J., Cermák, J., & Sustek, S. (1999). Mapping tree root systems with ground-penetrating radar. Tree Physiology, 19, 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC). (1999). Decision tree – Phytoremediation (Multiple pagination). Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC). (2001). Phytoremediation technical and regulatory guidance document (Multiple pagination). Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC). (2009). Phytotechnology technical and regulatory guidance and decision trees, revised. Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, C. L. (1954). Some relationships of evaporation rate to vapor pressure deficit and low wind velocity. Ecology, 35, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer, J. E. (1994). Description and application of capture zone delineation for a wellfield at Hilton Head Island, South Carolina (U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94–4012, 33 p.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer, J. E., & Bradley, P. M. (2003). Effect of hydrologic and geochemical conditions on oxygen-based bioremediation of gasoline-contaminated groundwater. Bioremediation Journal, 7, 165–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer, J. E., Chapelle, F. H., Petkewich, M. D., & Bradley, P. M. (1998a). Assessment of natural attenuation of aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater near a former manufactured gas plant. South Carolina, USA: Environmental Geology, 34, 279–292.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landmeyer, J. E., Pankow, J. F., Chapelle, F. H., Bradley, P. M., Church, C. D., & Tratnyek, P. G. (1998b). Fate of MTBE relative to benzene in a gasoline-contaminated aquifer (1993–98). Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, 18, 93–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marion, W., & Wilcox, S. (1994). Solar radiation data manual for flat-plate and concentrating collectors (NREL/TP–463–5607). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1994). Alternatives for groundwater cleanup: Washington. Washington, D.C: D.C. National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, S. A. (2003). Vegetative covers for waste containment. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 78, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theis, C.V. 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage: American Geophysical Union Transactions, 16th Annual Meeting (16):519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000a. Introduction to phytoremediation: EPA/600/R–99/107.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2001. Cost analysis for selected groundwater cleanup projects: Pump and treat systems and permeable reactive barriers: EPA 542–R–00–013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. T., Ross, R. P., & Acree, S. (2005). Using direct-push tools to map hydrostratigraphy and MTBE plume diving. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 25, 93–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Landmeyer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Landmeyer, J.E. (2012). Site Assessment and Characterization. In: Introduction to Phytoremediation of Contaminated Groundwater. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1957-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics