Abstract
The brain is the center of what makes us human. Art, culture, science, democracy, religion, technology – products of human thought and ideas, products of the unique capabilities of the human brain. Yet, for all but the last few decades, the human brain has been essentially a mystery, a biological organ whose functioning we could at best guess at from observations of human behavior and mental pathologies but about which we knew exceedingly little. All of that has changed, however. The rise of neuroscience as an interdisciplinary field of inquiry, deep investments during the 1990s – the Decade of the Brain – in new technologies, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, and long persistence on the part of pioneering scientists have given us a wealth of new insights into the behavior and function of the human central nervous system.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In addition, even if the ethical issues of nanotechnology could be successfully translated into bioethics and risk analysis frameworks, we would have the metaethical question of whether or not those frameworks are in themselves sufficient.
- 2.
For an overview of the state of the science, see, e.g., the Journal of Nanoneuroscience (http://www.aspbs.com/jns.htm) and a 2010 report on nanobiomedicine that focuses particularly on nanoneurotechnology (http://pharmabiotech.ch/reports/nanobiotechnology/)
- 3.
This paragraph is drawn, with slight modification, from Robert (2008).
- 4.
Especially people with disabilities – and especially given the controversy within deaf communities about an early neural prosthetic, the cochlear implant.
References
Allhoff, Fritz. 2008. On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics. In Nanotechnology & society: Current and emerging ethical issues, ed. Fritz Allhoff and Patrick Lin, 3–38. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Alpert, Sheri. 2008. Neuroethics and nanoethics: Do we risk ethical myopia? Neuroethics 1: 55–68.
Berne, Rosalyn W. 2006. Nanotalk: Conversations with scientists and engineers about ethics, meaning, and belief in the development of nanotechnology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bond, Phillip J. 2003. Preparing the path for nanotechnology. In Nanotechnology: Societal implications – Maximizing benefits for humanity: Report of the national nanotechnology initiative workshop, December 2–3, 2003, ed. Mihail C. Roco and Williams Sims Bainbridge, 16–21. Arlington: National Science Foundation.
Drexler, K.Eric. 1986. Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Books.
Godman, Marion. 2008. But is it unique to nanotechnology? Science and Engineering Ethics 14: 391–403.
Grunwald, Armin. 2000. Against over-estimating the role of ethics in technology development. Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 181–196.
Grunwald, Armin. 2005. Nanotechnology – A new field of ethical inquiry? Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 187–201.
Guston, David H. 2008. Innovation policy: Not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454: 940–941.
Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24: 93–109.
Hansson, Sven Ove. 2004. Great uncertainty about small things. Technè 8(2): 26–35.
Hodge, Graeme, Diana Bowman, and Karinne Ludlow. 2007. Introduction: Big questions for small technologies. In New global frontiers in regulation: The age of nanotechnology, ed. Graeme Hodge, Diana Bowman, and Karinne Ludlow, 3–26. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Holm, Sören. 2005. Does nanotechnology require a new ‘nanoethics’? London: Cardiff Centre for Ethics, Law & Society.
Johnson, Deborah G. 2007. Ethics and technology ‘in the making’: An essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1: 21–30.
Kaiser, Mario. 2006. Drawing boundaries of nanoscience – Rationalizing the concerns? The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34: 667–674.
Keiper, Adam. 2007. Nanoethics as a discipline? The New Atlantis 16: 55–67.
Lin, Patrick, and Fritz Allhoff. 2007. Nanoscience and nanoethics: Defining the discipline. In Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology, ed. Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin, James Moor, and John Weckert, 3–16. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
Litton, Paul. 2007. “Nanoethics”? What’s new? The Hastings Center Report 37: 22–25.
Meaney, Mark E. 2006. Lessons from the sustainability movement: Toward an integrative decision-making framework for nanotechnology. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34: 682–688.
Nordmann, Alfred. 2007. If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1: 31–46.
Parens, Erik, and Josaphine Johnston. 2007. Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics? European Molecular Biology Organization 8: S61–S64.
Parr, Douglas. 2005. Will nanotechnology make the world a better place? Trends in Biotechnology 23(8): 395–398.
Pidgeon, Nick, and Tee Rogers-Hayden. 2007. Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the public: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? Health, Risk and Society 9(2): 191–210.
Resnik, David B. 1998. The ethics of science: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
Robert, Jason Scott. 2008. Nanoscience, nanoscientists, and controversy. In Nanotechnology & society: Current and emerging ethical issues, ed. Fritz Allhoff and Patrick Lin, 225–239. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Robert, Jason Scott, Ira Bennett, and Jennifer Brian. Forthcoming. Just scenarios? Cultivating anticipatory assessment of novel nanotechnologies.
Roco, Mihail C. 2003. Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5: 181–189.
Roco, Mihail C., and W.S. Bainbridge (eds.). 2003. Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
van de Poel, Ibo. 2008. How should we do nanoethics? A network approach for discerning ethical issues in nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2: 25–38.
Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robert, J.S., Miller, C.A., Milleson, V. (2013). Introduction: Ethics and Anticipatory Governance of Nano-Neurotechnological Convergence. In: Hays, S., Robert, J., Miller, C., Bennett, I. (eds) Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1786-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1787-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)