Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to establish a decision-making method for evaluating capital investments in environmentally friendly projects. This method enables management decisions to be made appropriately under highly volatile conditions while promoting good corporate environmental behaviour. This chapter contributes to expand decision-making methods for environmental capital investment in environmental accounting. There are two challenges in establishing this method. The first is to convert environmental impact reduction into internal corporate value creation, which is done using the life-cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modelling (LIME) tool described in the chapter. The second is to incorporate management decision flexibility in the appraisal of environmental investment, which is done using real options theory. The total economic value of the environmentally friendly projects then includes net present value, environmental impact reduction value and managerial flexibility value.
This chapter describes how this new environmental investment decision-making method was applied to a hybrid vehicle project in order to verify its effectiveness. The result indicates that the project which appears unattractive when evaluated using existing methods can be shown as attractive when this method is applied. It is considered that this method can contribute to the promotion of innovative environmentally friendly projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auger P, Burke P, Devinney TM and Louviere JJ (2003) What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics 42.3 281–304
Berger PG, Ofek E and Swary I (1996) Investor valuation of the abandonment option Journal of Financial Economics 42.2 257–287
Chen YS, Shyh-Bao L and Wen CT (2006) The influence of Green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan Journal of Business Ethics 67.4 331–339
Copeland T and Antikarov U (2001) Real Options: A Practitioner’s Guide New York, Texere Llc.
Fairchild R (2008) The manufacturing sector’s environmental motives: a Game-theoretic analysis Journal of Business Ethics 79.3 333–344
Itsubo T and Inab A (2005) Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology Japan, Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry
Kokubu K (1999) Social and Environmental Accounting Tokyo, Chuokeizai-Sha Inc.
Kokubu K (2000) Environmental Accounting (Revised and Enlarged Edition) Tokyo, Saiensu Sha Co. Ltd.
Lyon T and Maxwell J (1999) Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: a survey in Franzini M and Nicita A Environmental Economics: Past, Present and Future Farnham, Ashgate Publishing
Machlachlan J and Gardner J (2004) A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors Journal of Business Ethics 25.1 11–25
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2002) Environmental Management Accounting Workbook Tokyo, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Japan
Mun J (2003) Practical Real Option Trans. Tokyo, Kozo Keikaku Engeneering Inc.
Myers SC and Majd S (1990) Abandonment value and project life Advances in Futures and Options Research 4 1–12
Schaltegger S (2008) Sustainability and accounting: the question for management Managing Business Cases for Sustainability 7th Proceedings of the Australasian Conference for Social and Environmental Accounting Research (A-CSEAR) Adelaide, CAGS 25–33
Smit HTJ and Trigeorgis L (2006) Real option and games: competition, alliances and other applications of valuation and strategy Review of Financial Economics 15.2 95–112
Trigeorgis L (2001) Real Options Trans. Kawaguchi Y, Maekawa S, Takezawa N and Yamaguchi T, Tokyo, The Economist
United States EPA (1992) Total Cost Assessment: Accelerating Industrial Pollution Prevention through Innovative Project Financial Analysis Washington DC, EPA
Williamson D, Lynch-Wood G and Ramsay J (2006) Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR Journal of Business Ethics 67.3 317–330
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minato, N. (2011). New Decision Method for Environmental Capital Investment. In: Burritt, R., Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Pohjola, T., Csutora, M. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1389-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1390-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)