Skip to main content

Synonyms

Respondent abuse

Definition

The impact of the interviewing process on individual respondents.

Description

Concerns about interview length and frequency date back to the 1920s. With the steady increase in the number and size of federally sponsored surveys, the US Office of Management and Budget set policies to reduce respondent burden with the Commission on Federal Paperwork (Sharp & Frankel, 1983). Many of these policies are concerned with eliminating redundant surveys. Guidelines for the protection of human subjects and institutional review boards are closely linked with the reduction of respondent burden. Respondent characteristics, such as age and level of education, may make the same survey burdensome to one group and not another. Wenemark, Frisman, Svensson and Kristenson (2010) showed a relationship between perceptions of burden and a measure of respondent motivation from intrinsic to extrinsic.

Bradburn (1979) proposed four categories of respondent burden – interview...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bradburn, N. (1979). Respondent burden. In L. Reeder (Ed.), Health survey research methods: Second biennial conference (Williamsburg, VA). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeg, D. J. H., van Tilburg, T., Smit, J. H., & de Leeuw, E. D. (2002). Attrition in the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam: The effect of differential inclusion in side studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 319–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäckle, A. (2008). Dependent interviewing: Effects on respondent burden and efficiency of data collection. Journal of Official Statistics, 24(3), 411–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, C., & Killworth, P. D. (2007). Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures. Social Networks, 29, 300–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peytchev, A., Couper, M. P., Mccabe, S. E., & Crawford, S. D. (2006). Web survey design: Paging versus scrolling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(4), 596–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peytchev, A. (2009). Survey breakoff. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 74–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. M., & Frankel, J. (1983). Respondent burden: A test of some common assumptions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenemark, M., Frisman, G. H., Svensson, T., & Kristenson, M. (2010). Respondent satisfaction and respondent burden among differently motivated participants in a health-related survey. Field Methods, 22(4), 378–390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher McCarty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

McCarty, C. (2014). Respondent Burden. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2501

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2501

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics