Skip to main content

The Axiom of Choice in the Foundations of Mathematics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foundational Theories of Classical and Constructive Mathematics

Part of the book series: The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 76))

Abstract

The principle of set theory known as the Axiom of Choice ( AC) has been hailed as “probably the most interesting and, in spite of its late appearance, the most discussed axiom of mathematics, second only to Euclid’s axiom of parallels which was introduced more than two thousand years ago”. It has been employed in countless mathematical papers, a number of monographs have been exclusively devoted to it, and it has long played a prominently role in discussions on the foundations of mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Fraenkel, Bar-Hillel, Levy (1973), Section II.4.

  2. 2.

    Zermelo does not actually give the principle an explicit name at this point, however. He does so only in his (1908), where he uses the term “postulate of choice”.

  3. 3.

    Zermelo’s formulation reads literally: A set S that can be decomposed into a set of disjoint parts A,B,C…, each containing at least one element, possesses at least one subset S 1 having exactly one element with each of the parts A,B,C,…, considered.

  4. 4.

    This argument, suitably refined, yields a rigorous derivation of AC in this formulation from Zorn’s lemma.

  5. 5.

    It is this formulation of AC that Russell and others refer to as the multiplicative axiom, since it is easily seen to be equivalent to the assertion that the product of arbitrary nonzero cardinal numbers is nonzero.

  6. 6.

    Ramsey (1926).

  7. 7.

    Quoted in Section 4.8 of Moore (1982).

  8. 8.

    Bernays (1930), translated in Mancosu (1998).

  9. 9.

    This fact, according to Bernays, renders the usual objections against the principle of choice invalid, since these latter are based on the misapprehension that the principle “claims the possibility of a choice”

  10. 10.

    Martin-Löf (2006).

  11. 11.

    See Martin-Löf (1975, 1982, 1984).

  12. 12.

    For a proof see, e.g., Tait (1994).

  13. 13.

    See Tait (1994).

  14. 14.

    Here \(\displaystyle{\coprod_{i\in I}}A_i\) may be identified with \(\displaystyle{\bigcup_{i\in I}}(A_i\times\{i\})\).

  15. 15.

    Diaconescu (1975).

  16. 16.

    Note, however, that if the axiom of choice is formulated within set theory or topos theory in the “harmless”—indeed mathematically useless—way (+), it is perfectly compatible with intuitionistic logic.

  17. 17.

    David Devidi has had the happy inspiration of calling ε α “the thing most likely to be α.”

  18. 18.

    Bell (1993a,b).

  19. 19.

    Aczel (2001).

  20. 20.

    Maietti (2005).

References

  • Aczel, P. and M. Rathjen (2001) Notes on Constructive Set Theory. Technical Report 40, Mittag-Leffler Institute, The Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences. Available on first author’s webpage www.cs.man.ac.uk/petera/papers

  • Bell, J. L. (1993a) Hilbert’s Epsilon-Operator and Classical Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22, 1–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. L. (1993b) Hilbert’s Epsilon Operator in Intuitionistic Type Theories, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. L. (2008) The Axiom of Choice and the Law of Excluded Middle in Weak Set Theories. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 54, 194–201.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. L. (2009) The Axiom of Choice, London: College Publications.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, P. (1930–31) Die Philosophie der Mathematik und die Hilbertsche Beweistheorie, Blätter für deutsche Philosophie 4, pp. 326–367, Translated in Mancosu, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconescu, R. (1975) Axiom of Choice and Complementation. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 51, 176–178.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, A., Y. Bar-Hillel and A. Levy (1973) Foundations of Set Theory, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. and Myhill, J. (1978) Choice Implies Excluded Middle, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 24(5), 461.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert D. (1926) Über das Unendliche, Mathematische Annalen 95. Translated in van Heijenoort, (ed.) From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, 1967, pp. 367–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maietti, M.E. (2005) Modular Correspondence Between Dependent Type Theories and Categories Including Pretopoi and Topoi. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 15 6, 1089–1145, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, P. (1998) From Brouwer to Hilbert, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. (1975) An Intuitionistic Theory of Types: predicative part, in Rose, H. E. and Shepherdson, J. C., (eds.), Logic Colloquium 73, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 73–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. (1982) Constructive Mathematics and Computer Programming, in Cohen, L. C. Los, J. Pfeiffer, H. and Podewski, K.P., (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 153–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. (1984) Intuitionistic Type Theory, Naples: Bibliopolis.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. (2006) 100 Years of Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice: What Was the Problem With It? The Computer Journal 49(3), pp. 345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. H. (1982) Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice. Its Origins, Development and Influence, Berlin: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1926) The Foundations of Mathematics, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 25, 338–384.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, W. W. (1994) The Law of Excluded Middle and the Axiom of Choice, in George, A. (ed.) Mathematics and Mind, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zermelo, E. (1904) Neuer Beweis, dass jede Menge Wohlordnung werden kann (Aus einem an Herrn Hilbert gerichteten Briefe), Mathematische Annalen 59, pp. 514–516. Translated in van Heijenoort, (ed.) From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967, pp. 139–141.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zermelo, E. (1908) Neuer Beweis für die Möglichkeit einer Wohlordnung, Mathematische Annalen 65, pp. 107–128. Translated in van Heijenoort, (ed.) From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967, pp. 183–198.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John L. Bell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bell, J.L. (2011). The Axiom of Choice in the Foundations of Mathematics. In: Sommaruga, G. (eds) Foundational Theories of Classical and Constructive Mathematics. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0431-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics