Skip to main content

Learning Organisations: Learning to Learn – The Learning Organisation in Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Jewish Education

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Religion and Education ((IHRE,volume 5))

Abstract

This chapter examines an approach to the challenge of rethinking and retooling American organizations that is widely used within educational organizations, including those serving the Jewish community: the creation of learning organizations. It reviews the development of the concept of the learning organization and discusses how it has been used in the Jewish educational world by looking at specific examples of its application. It also explores the relationship of evaluation research to creating organizations that learn. In this way the chapter addresses several questions: (1) Why has the concept of learning organizations been adapted for Jewish educational settings? (2) What has it contributed to Jewish educational practice? (3) What issues does it raise for Jewish educational practice and research?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Beckhard, R. What Is Organization Development? In Organization Development, ed. Joan Gallos, 3–12, Sage Publications and Burke, W. Where Did OD Come From? in the same volume, 13–37, for a short history of this field.

  2. 2.

    Aronson, D. Intro to Systems Thinking provides an accessible exploration of the concept; Aronson host The Thinking Page (http://www.thinking.net).

  3. 3.

    The 1983 government report, A Nation at Risk, was a clarion call that charged that the population of the United States was too poorly educated to compete in the global economy. This ushered in a period of intense efforts to reform American education on all levels: national efforts (the best example is the No Child Left Behind reform bill) complemented state, local, and school-based efforts.

  4. 4.

    For other examples see David Schoem’s 1989ethnography, Ethnic Survival in America, that vividly portrays deep problems with afternoon schools; Alvin Schiff’s controversial 1998 study, Jewish Supplementary Schooling: An Educational System in Need of Change. New York: Bureau of Jewish Education.

  5. 5.

    One of the earliest, Boston’s Combined Jewish Philanthropies, experimented with a five-pronged model (Shevitz, 1992) and followed with a long-term commitment to Jewish education (see http://www.cjp.org/page.aspx?id=68824).

  6. 6.

    Examples are the Mandel Foundation, with a long history of supporting Jewish education, the Covenant Foundation that was devoted to “supporting initiatives and ideas and the practitioners who have developed and harnessed them to change the face of Jewish education across the span of a generation” (http://www.covenantfn.org/splash/), the Whizin Foundation which, with its interest in Jewish family life, jumpstarted the field of Jewish family education, and Avi Chai Foundation whose commitment to Jewish education is clear from its mission (http://www.avi-chai.org/bin/en.jsp?enPage=BlankPage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=zone&enZone=AboutUs&enInfolet=Mission.jsp) Others have since become involved.

  7. 7.

    As experimentation continued, pragmatic solutions to the challenge of organizational learning developed. Some congregations decided to hold “Tot Shabbat” services separately or to designate specific services as Tot Shabbat events.

  8. 8.

    Personal email correspondence between Isa Aron and the rabbi (sent to author on 2/1/09).

  9. 9.

    In this region the ECE process was called RE-IMAGINE and the pilot project was RE-IMAGINING Professional Learning. The pilot, which was showing promising results, was not continued due to funders’ changing priorities (I was co-principal of the evaluation of this project. These comments are based on empirical data, discussion with ECE leaders, and representatives of the funder).

  10. 10.

    Examples include the Mandel Teacher Educator Initiative, study groups at individual day and congregational schools, peer-supervision methods being developed at some schools, teacher teams at the Jewish Early Childhood Education Initiative, and projects sponsored by central agencies of Jewish education – in Philadelphia, Boston and New York, to name a few.

  11. 11.

    By program evaluation I mean the systematic gathering of valid data that determine the extent to which a program is meeting its stated goals and suggest ways to improve the program. By impact evaluation, I mean following the participants in a program to see whether the longer-term intended impacts are occurring (for example, does going to Jewish summer camp lead to a positive Jewish identity as measured by specific traits?) in later life.

  12. 12.

    See Aron and Moskowitz (2009) for a fuller portrait of this congregation.

  13. 13.

    The data are drawn from the evaluations of the ECE and Synagogue 2,000 conducted by the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies.

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schon., D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, I. (1989). The malaise of Jewish education. Tikkun Magazine, 4(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, I. (2000). Becoming a congregation of learners. Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, I. (2002). The Self-renewing congregation. Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, I., Lee, S., & Rossel, S. (1995). A Congregation of learners. New York: Union of American Hebrew Congregations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, I., & Moskowitz, N. S. (2009). Beit Hazon, a visionary synagogue. In J. Wertheimer (Ed.), Learning and community: Jewish supplementary schools in the twenty-first century. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, D. Intro to ST. http://www.thinking.net/Systems_Thinking/Intro_to-ST/intro_to_st.hml.

  • Atlanta Jewish Times (1999, August 27). (http://www.atljewishtimes.com/archives/1999/082799cs.htm).

  • Bank, A. (1998). The view from Mulholland Drive. In A. Bank & R. Wolfson (Eds.), First fruit: A Whizin anthology of Jewish family education. Los Angeles: The Whizin Institute for Jewish Family Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. (1998). From puddle dock to the twenty-first century. In V. der Bogert (Ed.), Making learning communities work: The critical role of leader as learner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champy, J., & Hammer, M. (1993). Reengineering the corporation. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Bogert, V. (1999). Making learning communities work: The critical role of leader as learner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2008). The six secrets of change. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, D. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–96, July–August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. (2008, Summer). Evolution of the professional learning community. National Staff Development Council, 23(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, F., & Senge, P. (1993) Communities of commitment: The heart of the learning organization. In S. Chawla & J. Renesch (Eds.), Learning organizations: Developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kur, A. (2009) Cheshbon Hanefesh for Our Schools. Torah at the Center. Department of Lifelong Learning, Union of Reform Judaism, 12(1) (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A. A. (1926). Winnie the Pooh. London: Methuen & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, J. (1995). When school and synagogue are joined. In I Aron, S. Lee, & S. Rossel (Eds.), A congregation of learners. New York: Hebrew Union College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosov, W., & Isaacs, L. (2008). Program evaluation in Jewish education. In R. L. Goodman, P. A. Flexner, & L. D. Bloomerg (Eds.), What we now know about Jewish education: Perspectives on research through practice. Los Angeles: Torah Aura Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, A., Koren, A., & Shevitz, S. (2000). Sh’arim: Building gateways to Jewish life and community. Boston: Commission on Jewish Continuity, Bureau of Jewish Education and Cohen Center at Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting the culture of school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoem, D. (1989). Ethnic survival in America: An ethnography of a Jewish afternoon school. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., et al. (1999). The dance of change: The challenge of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., et al. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevitz, S. (1992). What we have learned: The projects of CJP’s supplemental school task force, 1987–1992 (Research Report 2). Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevitz, S. (1995). An organizational approach to changing Jewish education: What the literature reveals. In I. Aron, S. Lee, & S. Rossel (Eds.), A congregation of learners. New York: Union of American Hebrew Congregations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevitz, S. (1998). Evaluating communal initiatives: Facts can be friendly. In A. Bank & R. Wolfson (Eds.), First fruit: A Whizin anthology of Jewish family education. Los Angeles: The Whizin Institute for Jewish Family Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevitz, S., & Kaye, J. (1991). Writing for sesame street, directing traffic, or saving souls: Jewish family educators describe their practice. Journal of Jewish Communal Service, 67(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, J. (2005). Linking the silos: How to accelerate the momentum in Jewish education today. New York: The AVI CHAI Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, J. (Ed.). (2008). A census of Jewish supplementary schools in the United States. New York: The Avi Chai Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, J. (Ed.). (2009a). Learning and community: Jewish supplementary schools in the twenty-first century. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, J. (Ed.). (2009b). Schools that work: What we can learn from good Jewish supplementary schools. New York: The Avi Chai Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, R. (1998). Growing a field of dreams. In A. Bank & R. Wolfson (Eds.), First fruit: A Whizin anthology of Jewish family education. Los Angeles: The Whizin Institute for Jewish Family Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woocher, J. (1995). Toward a ‘Unified field theory’ of Jewish continuity. In I. Aron, S. Lee, & S. Rossel (Eds.), A congregation of learners. New York: Union of American Hebrew Congregations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan L. Shevitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shevitz, S.L. (2011). Learning Organisations: Learning to Learn – The Learning Organisation in Theory and Practice. In: Miller, H., Grant, L., Pomson, A. (eds) International Handbook of Jewish Education. International Handbooks of Religion and Education, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0354-4_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics