Skip to main content

Strong-Motion Networks in Italy and Their Efficient Use in the Derivation of Regional and Global Predictive Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Earthquake Data in Engineering Seismology

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 14))

  • 1304 Accesses

Abstract

Italy is a country characterized by high seismic hazard so strong-motion monitoring represents a relevant issue. Several strong-motion networks have been installed in the Italian territory during the last decades, with the aim of recording the ground motion generated by moderate to strong events or to monitor single regions. The collection of the strong-motion recordings of the Italian earthquakes was recently fulfilled and data are distributed through the ITACA database (http://itaca.mi.ingv.it). The new data set was used to develop a set of ground motion prediction equations (hereinafter GMPEs) for the Italian territory (Bindi et al., 2009a,c), in order to update the well known GMPEs developed by Sabetta and Pugliese [22]. The recent Mw 6.3 earthquake that occurred in central Italy on April 2009 and the upgrades of the ITACA database gave us the possibility to validate the predictive capability of the newly developed GMPEs and to explore the regional variability inside the Italian territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamson NA, Youngs RR (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:505–510

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ameri G, Massa M, Bindi D, D’Alema E, Gorini A, Luzi L, Marzorati S, Pacor F, Paolucci R, Puglia R, Smerzini C (2009) The 6 April 2009, Mw 6.3, L’Aquila (Central Italy) earthquake: strong-motion observations. Seismol Res Lett 80:951–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Attolico A, Gallipoli MR, Harabaglia P, Lapenna V, Mucciarelli M, Rosa AB (2009) A review of the activity of two accelerometric networks in Basilicata (Italy). Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9129–2

    Google Scholar 

  4. Augliera P, D’Alema E, Marzorati S, Massa M (2009) A strong motion network in northern Italy: detection capabilities and first analysis. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9165–y

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bindi D, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F (2009a) Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian accelerometric archive (ITACA). Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9130–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bindi D, Luzi L, Pacor F (2009b) Interevent and interstation variability computer for the Italian accelerometric archivi (ITACA). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2471–2488

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bindi D, Luzi L, Pacor F, Franceschina G, Castro RR (2006) Ground-motion predictions from empirical attenuation relationships versus recorded data: the case of the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, strong-motion data set. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:984–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bindi D, Luzi L, Pacor F, Sabetta F, Massa M (2009c) Towards a new reference ground motion prediction equation for Italy: update of the Sabetta-Pugliese (1996). Bull Earthquake Eng 7:591–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Strasser FO (2003) Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equations. Bull Earthquake Eng 1:171–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bragato PL, Slejko D (2005) Empirical ground-motion attenuation relations for the Eastern Alps in the magnitude range 2.5–6.3. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:252–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brillinger DR, Preisler HK (1985) Further analysis of the Joyner–Boore attenuation data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:611–614

    Google Scholar 

  12. Costa G, Moratto L, Suhadolc P (2009) The Friuli Venezia Giulia accelerometric network: RAF. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9157–y

    Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas J (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earthquake Sci Rev 61(1–2):43–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Douglas J (2007) On the regional dependence of earthquake response spectra. ISET J Earthquake Tech 44:71–99

    Google Scholar 

  15. ENV 1998-1-1, EUROCODE 8 (2002) Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures. Seismic Actions and General Requirements of Structures. CEN/TC 250, Draft, May 2002

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frisenda M, Massa M, Spallarossa D, Ferretti G, Eva C (2005) Attenuation relationships for low magnitude earthquakes using standard seismometric records. J Earthquake Eng 9:23–40

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gorini A, Nicoletti M, Marsan P, Bianconi R, De Nardis R, Filippi L, Marcucci S, Palma F, Zambonelli E (2009) The Italian strong motion network. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9141–6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iannaccone G, Zollo A, Elia L, Convertito V, Satriano C, Martino C, Festa G, Lancieri M, Bobbio A, Stabile TA, Vassallo M, Emolo A (2009) A prototype system for earthquake early-warning and alert management in southern Italy. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9131–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luzi L, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F (2008) ITACA (Italian accelerometric archive): a web portal for the dissemination of Italian strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett. doi:10.1785/gssrl.79.5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michelini A, Faenza L, Lauciani V, Malagnini L (2008) ShakeMap implementation in Italy. Seismol Res Lett 79:688–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morasca P, Zolezzi F, Spallarossa D, Luzi L (2008) Ground motion models for the Molise region (Southern Italy). Soil Dyn Earth Eng 28:198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:337–352

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spudich P, Joyner WB, Lindh AG, Boore DM, Margaris BM, Fletcher JB (1999) SEA99: a revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1156–1170

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zonno G, Montaldo V (2002) Analysis of strong ground motions to evaluate regional attenuation relationships. Ann Geoph 45:439–454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the organizing committee of the 2nd Euro-Med iterranean meeting on Accelerometric Data Exchange and Archiving (S. Akkar, P. Gülkan, A. Askan Gündoğan, T. van Eck, R. Bossu and F. Cotton) for inviting us to attend and contribute to the workshop.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Luzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luzi, L., Massa, M., Bindi, D., Pacor, F. (2011). Strong-Motion Networks in Italy and Their Efficient Use in the Derivation of Regional and Global Predictive Models. In: Akkar, S., Gülkan, P., van Eck, T. (eds) Earthquake Data in Engineering Seismology. Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0152-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics