Skip to main content

Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mistake of Law

Abstract

Mistake of law may excuse the perpetrator of an international crime. The provision in the ICC Statute, nevertheless, does not provide for this excuse. Based on the common law approach towards mistake of law, Article 32 is limited to a failure-of-proof defence. Only when the mistake negates the required intent will the defendant be exculpated. In truth, however, mistake of law does not concern the issue of intent; mistake of law concerns the culpability of the defendant. The result of the current codification is twofold. First, some mistakes, namely mistakes as to the prohibition as such and mistakes about justifications, are unduly not covered by the Statute. Second, under the current codification there is no room for differentiation according to the culpability of the defendant in making the mistake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See amongst other sources: Bybee 2002; Sands 2008; Hersch 2004; Gourevitch and Morris 2008.

References

  • Bybee (2002) Memorandum for Alberto Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340–2340A (‘The Torture Memos'), available at www.findlaw.com

  • Gourevitch P, Morris E (2008) Standard operating procedure. The Penguin Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersch SM (2004) Chain of command; The road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib. Allen Lane, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands P (2008) Torture team. Deception, cruelty and compromise of law. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annemieke van Verseveld .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Verseveld, A. (2012). Concluding Remarks. In: Mistake of Law. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-867-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships