Abstract
The evidence for species diversity effects on ecosystem functions is mainly based on studies not explicitly addressing local or regional processes regulating coexistence or the importance of community structure in terms of species evenness. In experimental communities of marine benthic microalgae, we altered the successional stages and thus the strength of local species interactions by manipulating rates of dispersal and disturbance. The treatments altered realized species richness, evenness and community biomass. For species richness, dispersal mattered only at high disturbance rates; when opening new space, dispersal led to maximized richness at intermediate dispersal rates. Evenness, in contrast, decreased with dispersal at low or no disturbance, i.e. at late successional stages. Community biomass showed a non-linear hump-shaped response to increasing dispersal at all disturbance levels. We found a positive correlation between richness and biomass at early succession, and a strong negative correlation between evenness and biomass at late succession. In early succession both community biomass and richness depend directly on dispersal from the regional pool, whereas the late successional pattern shows that if interactions allow the most productive species to become dominant, diverting resources from this species (i.e. higher evenness) reduces production. Our study emphasizes the difference in biodiversity–function relationships over time, as different mechanisms contribute to the regulation of richness and evenness in early and late successional stages.
Guest editors: L. Naselli-Flores & G. Rossetti / Fifty years after the “Homage to Santa Rosalia”: Old and new paradigms on biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cadotte, M. W., 2006. Dispersal and species diversity: a meta-analysis. American Naturalist 167: 913–924.
Cadotte, M. W., D. V. Mai, S. Jantz, M. D. Collins, M. Keele & J. A. Drake, 2006. On testing the competition–colonization trade-off in a multispecies assemblage. American Naturalist 168: 704–709.
Calcagno, V., N. Mouquet, P. Jarne & P. David, 2006. Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition–colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecology Letters 9: 897–907.
Cardinale, B. J. & M. A. Palmer, 2002. Disturbance moderates biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships: experimental evidence from caddisflies in stream mesocosms. Ecology 83: 1915–1927.
Cardinale, B. J., A. R. Ives & P. Inchausti, 2004. Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference. Oikos 104: 437–450.
Cardinale, B. J., D. S. Srivastava, J. E. Duffy, J. P. Wright, A. L. Downing, M. Sankaran & C. Jouseau, 2006a. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443: 989–992.
Cardinale, B. J., H. Hillebrand & D. F. Charles, 2006b. Geographic patterns of diversity in streams are predicted by a multivariate model of disturbance and productivity. Journal of Ecology 94: 609–618.
Eriksson, B. K., A. Rubach & H. Hillebrand, 2006. Biotic habitat complexity controls species diversity and nutrient effects on net biomass production. Ecology 87: 254–346.
Fox, J., 1997. Applied Regression, Linear Models, and Related Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Fox, J. W., 2005. Interpreting the ‘selection effect’ of biodiversity on ecosystem function. Ecology Letters 8: 846–856.
France, K. E. & J. E. Duffy, 2006. Diversity and dispersal interactively affect predictability of ecosystem function. Nature 441: 1139–1143.
Gamfeldt, L., H. Hillebrand & P. R. Jonsson, 2008. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89: 1223–1231.
Hastings, A., 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theoretical Population Biology 18: 363–373.
Hillebrand, H. & B. Matthiessen, 2009. Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecology Letters 12: 1–15.
Hillebrand, H. & U. Sommer, 2000. Diversity of benthic microalgae in response to colonization time and eutrophication. Aquatic Botany 67: 221–236.
Hillebrand, H., C.-D. Dürselen, D. Kirschtel, U. Pollinger & T. Zohary, 1999. Biovolume calculations for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 103–424.
Hillebrand, H., D. S. Gruner, E. T. Borer, M. E. S. Bracken, E. E. Cleland, J. J. Elser, W. S. Harpole, J. T. Ngai, E. W. Seabloom, J. B. Shurin & J. E. Smith, 2007. Consumer versus resource control of producer diversity depends on ecosystem type and producer community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 10904–10909.
Hillebrand, H., D. Bennet & M. W. Cadotte, 2008. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89: 165–173.
Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold & R. D. Holt, 2005. Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin III, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, D. M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setälä, A. J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer & D. A. Wardle, 2005. Effects on biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3–35.
Johnson, J. B. & C. B. Omland, 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 101–108.
Kneitel, J. M. & T. M. Miller, 2003. Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. American Naturalist 162: 165–171.
Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical Ecology, 2nd English ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Leibold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau & A. Gonzalez, 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7: 601–613.
Levins, R. & D. Culver, 1971. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 68: 1246–1248.
Loreau, M. & A. Hector, 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412: 72–76.
Loreau, M., S. Naeem & P. Inchausti, 2002. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Oxford University Press, New York.
Lotze, H. K., H. S. Lenihan, B. J. Bourque, R. H. Bradbury, R. G. Cooke, M. C. Kay, S. M. Kidwell, M. X. Kirby, C. H. Peterson & J. B. C. Jackson, 2006. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312: 1806–1809.
Matthiessen, B. & H. Hillebrand, 2006. Dispersal frequency affects local biomass production by controlling local diversity. Ecology Letters 9: 652–662.
Matthiessen, B., L. Gamfeldt, H. Hillebrand & P. Jonsson, 2007. Effects of grazer richness and composition on algal biomass in a closed and open marine system. Ecology 87: 178–187.
Matthiessen, B., E. Mielke & U. Sommer, 2010. Dispersal decreases diversity in heterogeneous metacommunities by enhancing regional competition. Ecology 91: 2022–2033.
Mouquet, N., J. L. Moore & M. Loreau, 2002. Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecology Letters 5: 56–65.
Norberg, J., D. P. Swaney, J. Dushoff, J. Lin, R. Casagrandi & S. A. Levin, 2001. Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: a theoretical framework. PNAS 98: 11376–11381.
Östman, Ö., J. M. Kneitel & J. M. Chase, 2006. Disturbance alters habitat isolation’s effect on biodiversity in aquatic microcosms. Oikos 114: 360–366.
R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.
Tilman, D., 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75: 2–16.
Tilman, D., P. B. Reich & J. M. H. Knops, 2006. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441: 629–632.
Wardle, D. A., 1999. Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87: 403–407.
Weiss, J. J., B. J. Cardinale, K. J. Forshay & A. R. Ives, 2007. Effects of species diversity on community biomass production change over the course of succession. Ecology 88: 929–939.
Yu, D. W. & H. B. Wilson, 2001. The competition–colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition–colonization trade-off. American Naturalist 158: 49–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matthiessen, B., Ptacnik, R., Hillebrand, H. (2010). Diversity and community biomass depend on dispersal and disturbance in microalgal communities. In: Naselli-Flores, L., Rossetti, G. (eds) Fifty years after the ‘‘Homage to Santa Rosalia’’: Old and new paradigms on biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems. Developments in Hydrobiology 213, vol 213. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9908-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9908-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9907-5
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9908-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)