Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Theistic Model of Physical Temporality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Astronomy and Civilization in the New Enlightenment

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 107))

  • 699 Accesses

Abstract

Experience suggests that any form of time is an advancing sequence of states of affairs, which is ordered but not necessarily measured. The observed temporality of the universe is attributed to the divine life. Time in God is taken to be unmeasured. The model postulates a program running in God’s time and represented by a black box, which produces a temporal universe chosen from the tree of actualizable worlds. Physical time is then a totally ordered independent variable for physical processes, with its measures derived from these processes. As usual, physical theories are regarded as more particular models of the resulting temporal universe. The theistic model is applied to relativity, quantum mechanics, philosophy, and theology. To avoid speculation, God’s time is further described by intervals of unknown internal structure. With God’s time in the background, there is a conceptual integration of God and the universe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Danto, Arthur and Sidney Morgenbesser. 1967. Philosophy of science. Cleveland: World Publishing Company, Meridian Books, 7th printing, 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donne, John. 1624. Meditation XIV, http://www.online-literature.com/donne/406 (accessed July 29, 2009).

  • Feynman, R.P. 1961. Quantum electrodynamics. New York: W. A. Benjamin, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R.P. 1949. The theory of positrons. Physical Review 76(6): 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J.T., F.C. Haber, and G.H. Müller, eds. 1972. The study of time. Proceedings of the first conference of the International Society for the Study of Time, Oberwolfach (Black Forest) – West Germany. Berlin: Springer, 320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, A.E. 2002. A scientific theology, vol. 2. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 268–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac. 1934. Scholium to the definitions in Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Bk. 1 (1689); trans. Andrew Motte (1729), rev. Florian Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, T.J. 1993. Infinity and the absolute: insights into our world, our faith, and ourselves. Christian Scholars Review 23(2): 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A.N. 1958. The syntax of time distinctions. Franciscan Studies 18: 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A.N. 1967. Past, present and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 203–205.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. 1956. The direction of time. Berkeley: University of California, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, Rudy. 1995. Infinity and the mind. Boston: Birkäuser, 1982; repr. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.J. 1997. The God who infinitely transcends infinity. In How large is God? ed. John Marks Templeton, 137–165. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somayaji, D.A. 1971. A critical study of the ancient Hindu astronomy in the light and language of the modern. Dharwar: Karnatak University, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhart, Eric C. 2009. A mathematical model of divine infinity. Theology and Science 7(3): 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A.P. 1997. A program model of becoming. Physics Essays 10(1): 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A.P. 2009. “Time,” http://homepage.ntlworld.com/stone-catend/time.htm (accessed 22 September 2009).

  • Whitrow, G.J. 1980. The natural philosophy of time, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, Wesley J. 2004. The divine action project, 1988–2003. Theology and Science 2(1): 31–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinkernagel, Henrik. 2008. Did time have a beginning? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22(3): 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Theological Research and Communication Institute, New Delhi, India

    Anthony P. Stone

Authors
  1. Anthony P. Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony P. Stone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ivy Pointe Way 1, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA

    Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka

  2. Konkoly Observatory of the Hung. Ac. of, Almaskert 10, Zebegeny, 2627, Hungary

    Attila Grandpierre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stone, A.P. (2011). A Theistic Model of Physical Temporality. In: Tymieniecka, AT., Grandpierre, A. (eds) Astronomy and Civilization in the New Enlightenment. Analecta Husserliana, vol 107. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9748-4_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation