Abstract
Irony of fate! Democritus is the only philosopher mentioned in one of his works by Archimedes, and wrote about mathematical things, while neither Plato nor Aristotle are mentioned by him nor have they written about mathematics, but only witnesses scattered here and there in their writings and very often confused, yet they’re considered Archimedes’ inspirers! (Boyer 1939, Delsedine 1970, Frajese 1974, Gambiano 1992, Reymond 1979). But Archimedes violates the prohibitions of Plato and Aristotle and is inspired by the philosophy of Democritus. It is argued about Archimedes’ sections-weights (toma…-b£rea) and Aristotle’s and Democritus’ indivisible magnitudes (¥toma megšqh). (Luria 1970, Mugler 1970, Ver Ecke 1959, Furley 1967).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle 1a, On the Generation and Corruption, translated by H. H. Joachim, eBooks@ Adelaide 2007, I2, 315b, 25-30.
Aristotle 1b, ib. 316a, 25-30.
Aristotle 2a, Physics, translated by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye, VII, 250a, 16-19.
Aristotle 2b, ib. VI, 241a, 5-15.
Boyer C.B., The Concepts of the Calculus, N. York, 1939, p. 48.
Boscarino G. Tradizioni di pensiero. La tradizione filosofica italica della scienza e della realtà. Mondotre-La scuola italica, Sortino, 1999.
Delsedine P., L’infini numérique dans l’Arénaire d’Archimède, Ahes, 1970, 345-59.
Dijksterhuis E.J., Archimedes, Copenhagen, 1956. p. 319, p. 316.
Frajese A., Archimede, Opere, Utet, Torino.
Furley D.J., Two Studies in the Greek atomist. Study I. Indivisible magnitudes.
Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1967.
Galilei G., Opere, Utet, Turino, 1964, vol. II, p. 613.
Gambiano G., Scoperta e dimostrazione in Archimede,in Archimede. Mito Tradizione Scienza, Olski, Firenze 1992, pp. 21-41.
Heath S. T., A History of Greek Mathematics, Vol. II, Dover Publications, New York, 1981, p. 557, p. 30.
Heath T.L., The Works of Archimedes, with a Supplement The Method of Archimedes, Dover Publications, New York, 1912, p. 13-14.
Laertius D. trans. R. D. Hicks, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, I, Trans. R. D. Hicks, 1925. Harvard University Press 1925.
Luria S., Democritea, Leningrad, 1970.
Mugler C., Les oeuvres d’Archimède, Paris, 1970.
Plutarch, Works, Marcellus, translated by John Dryden, The Internet Classics Archive.
Peano G., Opere. For a harsh judgement about Plato, witness of mathematical things, I recall a judgement of Peano, who certainly knew about mathematics, as with Greek philology: “Untrue in the philosopher’s dialogues there are some mathematical terms here and there, but reunited in such an uncertain way that they were considered as difficult words which an interlocutor looks for to confuse his adversary; almost like in our political newspapers of today incommensurable is written instead of very big” (See Giuseppe Peano, Opere, Vol. III, Roma, 1958, p. 249).
Reymond V., Le platonisme d’Archimède, Revue philosophique, 169, 1979, pp. 189-92. Ver Eecke P., Les oeuvres completes d’Archimède, Paris, 1959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this paper
Cite this paper
Boscarino, G. (2010). The Mystery of Archimedes. Archimedes, Physicist and Mathematician, Anti-Platonic and Anti-Aristotelian Philosopher. In: Paipetis, S., Ceccarelli, M. (eds) The Genius of Archimedes -- 23 Centuries of Influence on Mathematics, Science and Engineering. History of Mechanism and Machine Science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9091-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9091-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9090-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9091-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)