Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Indirect Estimation of Migration

Abstract

In countries with well-developed data reporting systems, demographic estimation is based on data collected by censuses and vital registration systems. In countries with inadequate or inaccurate data reporting systems, demographic estimation must rely on methods that are more “indirect.” Such estimation techniques usually adopt model schedules—parameterized functions describing collections of age-specific rates that are based on patterns observed in populations other than the one being studied—selecting one of them on the basis of some incomplete data on the observed population. The justification for such an approach is that age profiles of observed schedules of rates vary within predetermined limits for most human populations. Rates for one age group are highly correlated with those of other age groups, and expressions of such interrelationships form the basis of model schedule construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Rogers, A., & Raymer, J. (1999). Fitting observed demographic rates with the multiexponential model schedule: An assessment of two estimation programs. Review of Urban and Regional studies, 11(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P. H., & Willekens, F. J. (1986). Data and accounts. In A. Rogers & F. J. Willekens (Eds.), Migration and settlement: A multiregional comparative study (pp. 19–58). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetrogan, S., & Long, J. (1990). Creating annual state-to-state migration flows with demographic detail. In United States. Bureau of the Census (Ed.), Perspectives on migration analysis. Current population reports, P-23, No. 166. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., Raymer, J., & Newbold, K. B. (2003). Reconciling and translating migration data collected over time intervals of differing widths. Annals of Regional Science, 37(4), 581–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citro, C. F. (1998). Model-based small-area estimates: The next major advance for the federal statistical system for the 21st century. Chance, 11(3), 40–41, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrykowska, A. (1986). Modelling inter-regional migrations in Poland, 1977–1981. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 60, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, M. V. (1994). Population projections for Canada, provinces and territories, 19932016. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Demography Division, Population Projections Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & Haining, R. P. (1985). Spatial structure and spatial interaction: Modeling approaches to the statistical analysis of geographical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 148(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., & Castro, L. J. (1981). Model migration schedules. Research report 81–30. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1960). Methods of regional analysis: An introduction to regional science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P. S. (1985). Estimation of period-specific gross migration flows from limited data: Bi-proportional adjustment approach. Demography, 22(1), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., Willekens, F., & Raymer, J. (2003). Imposing age and spatial structures on inadequate migration-flow datasets. Professional Geographer, 55(1), 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F., Por, A., & Raquillet, R. (1981). Entropy, multiproportional, and quadratic techniques for inferring patterns of migration from aggregate data. In A. Rogers (Ed.), Advances in multiregional demography. Research report 81–6. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeyr, B. E. (1988). Application of a mathematical model to South African migration data, 1975–1980. Southern African Journal of Demography, 2(1), 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymer, J., & Rogers, A. (2008). Applying model migration schedules to represent age-specific migration flows. In J. Raymer & F. Willekens (Eds.), International migration in Europe: Data, models and estimates (pp. 175–192). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. G. (1970). Entropy in urban and regional modelling. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., & Little, J. S. (1994). Parameterizing age patterns of demographic rates with the multiexponential model schedule. Mathematical Population Studies, 4(3), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhidin, S. (2002). The population of Indonesia: Regional demographic scenarios using a multiregional method and multiple data sources. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabe, H. (1990). Migration rates by age group and migration patterns: Application of Rogers’ migration schedule model to Japan, The Republic of Korea, and Thailand. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, K.-L., & Nagnur, D. N. (1985). Characterization of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan outmigration schedules of the Canadian population system, 1971–1976. Canadian Studies in Population, 12(1), 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., & Jordan, L. (2004). Estimating migration flows from birthplace-specific population stocks of infants. Geographical Analysis, 36(1), 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. J. (1983b). Specification and calibration of spatial interaction models: A contingency-table perspective and an application to intra-urban migration in Rotterdam. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 74(4), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, J. C. H. (1986). The analysis and projection of interregional migration in the United Kingdom. In R. Wood & P. Rees (Eds.), Population structures and models: Developments in spatial demography (pp. 160–292). London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., & Raymer, J. (2005). Origin dependence, secondary migration, and the indirect estimation of migration flows from population stocks. Journal of Population and Research, 22(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, D. J., Hinze, K. E., & White, M. J. (1982). Techniques of estimating net migration. Chicago, Ill.: Community and Family Study Center, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1968). Matrix analysis of interregional population growth and distribution. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aufhauser, E., & Fischer, M. M. (1985). Log-linear modelling and spatial analysis. Environment and Planning A, 17(7), 931–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, R. A., & Healy, M. K. (1981). Measuring interstate migration flow: An origin destination network based on Internal Revenue Service records. Environment and Planning A, 13(11), 1345–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F., & Baydar, N. (1986). Forecasting place-to-place migration with generalized linear models. In R. I. Wood & P. Rees (Eds.), Population structures and models: Developments in spatial demography (pp. 203–244). London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1975). Introduction of multiregional mathematical demography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J. (1963). Maximum-entropy for hypothesis formulation, especially for multidimensional contingency tables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(3), 911–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. J. (1980). Entropy, multiproportional adjustment and the analysis of contingency tables. Systemi Urbani, 2, 171–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., & Watkins, J. (1987). General versus elderly interstate migration and population redistribution in the United States. Research on Aging, 9(4), 483–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J., & Bracken, I. (1982). Estimation of migration profiles in England and Wales. Environment and Planning A, 14(7), 889–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yano, K. (1991). The integration of spatial interaction models using generalized linear modeling. Geographical Review of Japan, 64(6), 367–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. (1992). Introducing quantitative geography: Measurement, methods and generalised linear models. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., & Liu, J. (2005). Estimating directional migration flows from age-specific net migration data. Review of Urban and Regional Development, 17(3), 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei Rogers .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, A., Raymer, J., Little, J. (2010). Introduction. In: The Indirect Estimation of Migration. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8915-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics