Skip to main content

Studding the Impacts of Technological Measures on the Biological Activity of Pluvial Eroded Soils

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Land Degradation and Desertification: Assessment, Mitigation and Remediation

Abstract

Pedo-biological indicators, together with physical and chemical indicators, are important elements in the complex task of determining soil quality and reducing negative effects of soil degradation. In this chapter we present the results of the soil biology research on degraded lands by pluvial erosion, disposed in agroterraces, located in North–Eastern part of Romania. The experiment was established in a sloping field in Podu-Iloaiei, Iasy county on a Cambic Chernozem at 0–20 cm depth to study the seasonal evolution (spring-summer) of the biotic potential (soil respiration and cellulolysae) without irrigation. Our data deriving from this experiment indicate that disposed antierosional measures such as agroterraces, have produced lower values of the biological activity on top slope, in control section and, also, in various fertilized variants. Much better results of tenaces were recorded on lower slopes. The effects of pluvial erosion have a higher negative influence on soil biological activity. The excessively dry summer season had a stressing and restricting effect on biological activity of the soil as well. The Indicator of Vital Activities Potential (IVAP) was correlated with soil physical and chemical indicators to establish possible relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ailincăi, C. (2007). Agrotehnica Terenurilor Arabile. Editura “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, Iaşi, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antisari, L.V., Vianello, G., Pontalti, F., Lorito, S. and Gherardi, M. (2008). Land use effects on organic matter in brown soils of the Emilian Apennines. In: C. Dazzi and E.A.C. Costantini (eds.), The Soils of Tomorrow-Soils Changing in a Changing World, Advances in Geoecology, Catena Verlag, Germany, 39:311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bending, G.D., Turner, M.K., Rayns, F., Marx, M.C. and Wood, M. (2004). Microbial and biochemical soil quality indicators and their potential for differentiating areas under contrasting agricultural management regimes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36:1785–1792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bireescu, G. (2001). Researches concerning vital and enzymatic processes in forestry and agricultural soils from Moldova. Ph.D Thesis, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bireescu, G., Bireescu, L., Breabăn, I., Lupaşcu, A. and Teodorescu, E., 2007. Ecopedological study over soil resources in forest ecosystems from Moldavian Plain. Lucr. şt. USAMV Iaşi, Romania, seria Horticultură, anul L. 1(50):863–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bireescu, L., Bireescu, G., Lupaşcu, G., Secu, C. and Breabăn, I. (2005). Interpretarea ecologică a solului şi evaluarea impactului ecologic global în ecosisteme praticole situate peterenuri degradate din Podişul Bârladului. Lucr. Conf. Naţ. Şt. Sol., Timişoara, Romania, 2(34 B):473–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiriţă, C. (1974). Ecopedologie cu baze de pedologie generală. Ed. Ceres, Bucureşti, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, R.P. (1997). Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: C.E. Pankhurst, B.M. Doube and V.V.S.R. Gupta (eds.), Biological Indicators of Soil Health. CAB International, Wallingford, USA, pp. 121–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilly, O. and Blume, H.P. (1998). Indicators to assess sustainable land use with reference to soil microbiology. Advances in GeoEcology 31:29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J.W. and Parkin, T.B. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In: J.W. Doran (ed.), Defining Soil Quality for Sustainable Environment. SSSA Special Publication. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. and American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI, pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J.W. and Zeiss, M.R. (2000). Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology 15:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, E.T. (1997). Rationale for developing bioindicators of soil health. In: C.E. Pankhurst, B.M. Doube and V.V.S.R. Gupta (eds.), Biological Indicators of Soil Health. CAB International, Wellington, pp. 49–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahbakhshazad, N., Dinnes, D.L., Li, C., Jaynes, D.B. and Salas, W. (2008). Modeling biogeochemical impacts of alternative management practices for a row-crop field in Iowa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 123:30–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fauci, M.F. and Dick, R.P. (1994). Microbial biomass as an indicator of soil quality: Effects of long-term management and recent soil amendments. In: J.W. Doran, D.C. Coleman, D.F. Bezdicek and B.A. Stewart (eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. SSSA Special Publication, 35, Minneapolis, Soil Science Society of America, 17:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfreda, L. and Bollag, J.M. (1996). Influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on enzyme activity in soil. In: G. Stotzky and J.M. Bollag (eds.), Soil Biochemistry 9:123–194, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfreda, L., Rao, M.A., Piotrowska, A., Palumbo, G. and Colombo, C. (2005). Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: Intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution. Science of the Total Environment 341:265–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Romania, Ministry of Agriculture Forests and Rural Development. (2006). National Strategic Plan of Rural Development, 2007–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen, D.L., Anrews, S.S. and Doran, J.W. (2001). Soil quality: Current concepts and applications. In: D.L. Sparks (ed.), Advances in Agronomy 74:1–40, Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen, D.L., Mausbach, M.J., Doran, J.W., Cline, R.G., Harris, R.F. and Schuman, G.E. (1997). Soil quality: A Concept, Definition and a Framework for Evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61:4–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepp, J.D., Coleman, D.C., Crosslez, D.A., Jr. and Clark, J.S. (2000). Biological indices of soil quality: An ecosystem case study of their use. Forest Ecology and Management 138:357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kõlli, R., Köster, T., Tõnutare, T. and Kauer, K. (2008). Influence of land use change on soil humus status and on soil cover environment protection ability. In: C. Dazzi and E.A.C. Costantini (eds.), The Soils of Tomorrow-Soils Changing in a Changing World, Advances in Geoecology, Catena Verlag, Germany, 39:27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubat, J. et al. (2001). Relationships between soil productivity and soil quality. Symposium. Crop Science on the Verge of the 21st Century-Opportunities and Challenges. Prague, pp. 154–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. and Goh, K.M. (2002). Management practices of antecedent leguminous and non-leguminous crop residues in relation to winter wheat yield, nitrogen uptake, soil nitrogen mineralization and simple nitrogen balance. European Journal of Agronomy 16:295–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, S., Sainju, U.M. and Jellum, E.J. (1997a). Winter cover crop effects on soil organic carbon and carbohydrate. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61:145–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., Mokma, D. and Lowery, B. (1999). Relation between soil quality and erosion. In: Soil Quality and Soil Erosion. Soil and Water Conserv. Soc., Ankeny, IA, pp. 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, T., Herweg, K., Liniger, H., Schneider, F., Hurni, H. and Prasuhn, V. (2008). Erosion damage mapping: Assessing current soil erosion damage in Switzerland. In: C. Dazzi and E.A.C. Costantini (eds.), The Soils of Tomorrow-Soils Changing in a Changing World, Advances in Geoecology, Catena Verlag, Germany, 39:263–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäder, P., Pfiffner, L., Fliessbach, A., von-Lützow, M. and Munch, J.C. (1997). Soil ecology-Impact of organic and conventional agriculture on soil biota and its significance for soil fertility. Vth International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, A.D. (1975). Soil as a system of humus and clay immobilized enzymes. Chemic Scripta 8:97–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McVay, K.A., Radcliffe, D.E. and Hargrove, W.L. (1989). Winter legume effects on soil properties and nitrogen fertilizer requirements. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53:1856–1862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misono, S. (1977). Three phases distribution as a factor of soil fertility. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Soil Surviron and Fertility Management in Intensive Agriculture (SEFMIA). Tokyo, pp. 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munteanu, I. and Florea, N. (2001). Present-day status of soil classification in Romania. In: E. Micheli, F.O. Nachtergaele, R.J.A. Jones and L. Montanarella (eds.), Soil Classification. Contributions to the International Symposium “Soil Classification 2001”, 8–12 October 2001. Velence, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastin, N., Rosenplänter, K. and Hüttermann, A. (1988). Seasonal variation of enzyme activity and their dependence on certain soil factors in a beech forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 20:637–642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reintam, L., Rooma, I. and Kull, A. (2001). Map of soils vulnerability and degradation in Estonia. In: D.E. Stott, R.H. Mohtar and G.C. Steinhardt (eds.), Sustaining the Global Farm. Purdue University and USDA-ARS NSERL, CD-ROM:1068–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Institute for soil Science and Agrochemistry, Bucharest, Romania. (2001). National Strategy and Action Programme concerning Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought Prevent and Control – 27 November, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose, E. (2008). Soil erosion, conservation and restauration: A few lessons from 50 years of research in Africa. In: C. Dazzi and E.A.C. Costantini (eds.), The Soils of Tomorrow-Soils Changing in a Changing World, Advances in Geoecology, Catena Verlag, Germany, 39:159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, J.L. (2008). Soil, the crucial link. Foreword. In: C. Dazzi and E.A.C. Costantini (eds.), The Soils of Tomorrow-Soils Changing in a Changing World, Advances in Geoecology, Catena Verlag, Germany, 39:159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainju, U.M., Singh, B.P., Whitehead, W.F. and Wang, S. (2006). Carbon supply and storage in tilled and nontilled soils as influenced by cover crops and nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Environmental Quality 35:1507–1517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, E.D. (2005). Plant Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seybold, C.A., Mausbach, J.M., Karlen, D.L. and Rogers, H.H. (1997). Quantification of soil quality. In: R. Lal, J.M. Kimble and S. Follet (eds.), Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. CRC Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafi, M., Bakht, J., Jan, M.T. and Shah, Z. (2007). Soil C and N dynamics and maize (Zea mays) yield as affected by cropping systems and residue management in North-western Pakistan. Soil and Tillage Research 94:520–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, Z., Shah, S.H., Peoples, M.B., Schwenke, G.D. and Herriedge, D.F. (2003). Crop residue and fertilizer N effects on nitrogen fixation and yields of legume-cereal rotations and soil organic fertility. Field Crops Research 83:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ştefanic, G. (1994a). Cuantificarea fertilităţii solului prin indici biologici. Lucr. Şt Conf. Naţ. Şt. Sol., Tulcea, S.N.R.S.S., 28A:45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ştefanic, G. (1994b). Biological definition, quantifyng method and agricultural interpretation of soil fertility. Romanian Agricultural Research 2:107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ştefanic, G., Sandoiu, D.I. and Gheorghita, N. (2006). Biologia Solurilor Agricole. Editura Elisavaros, Bucuresti, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroosnijder, L. and Slegers, M. (2008). Soil degradation and droughts in sub-Saharan Africa. In: C. Dazzi and E.A.C. Costantini (eds.), The Soils of Tomorrow-Soils Changing in a Changing World, Advances in Geoecology, Catena Verlag, Germany, 39:413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Such, Y.S., Kyuma, K. and Kawaguchi, K., 1977. A method of capability evaluation for upland soil. 4 fertility evaluation and fertility classification. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 23(3):275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teaci, D. (1980). Bonitatea Terenurilor Agricole. Editura Ceres, Bucureşti, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, H. (1960). Der zellulosetest, eine Methode zur Ermittlung der Zellulolytischen Aktivität des Bodes in Feldversuchen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung, Düngung, Bodenkunde 91(1):44–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, W. and Voets, J.P. (1974). Impact in sugarbeet crops of some important pesticide treatment systems on the microbial and enzymatic constitution of the soil. Met. Fak. Landban., Gent. 39:1263–1277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, W. and Voets, J.P. (1977). Soil microbial and biochemical characteristics in reletion to soil management and fertility. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 9:253–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vostrov, I.S. and Petrova, A.N. (1961). Opredelenie biologhiceskoi aktivnosti pocivîrazlicinîmi metodami. Mikrobiologiia 4:665–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRB. (2006). World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geanina Bireescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bireescu, G., Ailincai, C., Raus, L., Bireescu, L. (2010). Studding the Impacts of Technological Measures on the Biological Activity of Pluvial Eroded Soils. In: Zdruli, P., Pagliai, M., Kapur, S., Faz Cano, A. (eds) Land Degradation and Desertification: Assessment, Mitigation and Remediation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8657-0_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics