Skip to main content

Practices for global sensitivity analysis of model output are described in a recent textbook (Saltelli et al., 2007). These include (i) variance based techniques for general use in modelling, (ii) the elementary effect method for factor screening for factors-rich models and (iii) Monte Carlo filtering. In the present work we try to put the practices into the context of their usage. We start by describing the present debate on the use of scientific models, and how uncertainty and sensitivity analysis can assist is testing model quality. We discuss Type I, II and III errors in the context of sensitivity analysis and what are the requirements for a good analysis. We also present sensitivity analysis in relation to post normal science (PNS) and model pedigrees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baudrillard, J., 1999, Revenge of the Crystal, Pluto Press, London, UK, p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M. B., Ravetz, J. R., Mulkey, L. A., and Barnwell, T. O., 1997, Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 11, 229–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K. J., 2001, Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester. See also (31), pp. 151–192, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C., 1993, Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 158(3), 419–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M., 2004, State of Fear, Harper Collins, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. N., 1997, Cognitive Impairment and Social Problem Solving: Some Tests for Type III Errors in Policy Analysis, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission SEC, 2005, 791 IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES, 15 June 2005, http://ec.europa.eu/governance/docs/index en.htm

  • Environmental Protection Agency, Models Guidance Draft — November 2003 Draft Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Regulatory Environmental Models Prepared by: The Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling, http://cfpub.epa.gov/crem/cremlib.cfm.

  • Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R., 1990, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R., 1993, Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 735 755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S., O'Connor, M., Faucheux, S., Froger, G., and Munda, G., 1996, Emergent complexity and procedural rationality: post-normal science for sustainability, In: Costanza R, Segura O, Martinez-Alier J, editors. Getting down to earth: practical applications of ecological economics. Washington (D.C.): Island Press, 1996:223–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery A. E., and Volinsky C. T., 1999, Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial, Statistical Science, 14(4), 382417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P., 2007, A Guide to Econometrics, Fifth edition, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konikov, L. F. and Bredehoeft, J. D., 1992, Groundwater models cannot be validated, Advances in Water Resources, 15(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E., 1990, “Let's take the con out of econometrics” and “sensitivity analysis would help”, in Modelling Economic Series (ed. Granger, C. W. J.), Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macilwain, C., 2006, Safe and sound? Nature, 442, 242–243 (20 July 2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, D., 2005, Doubt is their product, Scientiffc American, 292(6), 96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 2002, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies; Notice; Republication, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/, February 22, 2002.

  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 2006, Proposed Risk Assessment Bulletin (January 9, 2006), http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/

  • Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitz, K., 1994, Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences, Science, 263, 641–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkey, O. and Pilkey-Jarvis, L., 2007, Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can't Predict the Future, Columbia University Press, Irvington, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R., 1991, Life Itself – A Comprehensive Inquiry into Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. Columbia University Press, Irvington, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Ratto, M., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S., 2007, Sensitivity Analysis of Scientific Models, John Wiley and Sons, to appear in winter 2007. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, K., Chan, A., and Scott, M., Editors, 2000, Sensitivity Analysis, Probability and Statistics series, John Wiley and Sons. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., and Ratto, M., 2004, Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N., 2007, The Black Swan, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluijs, J. P., 2002, A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment, Futures, 34, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluijs, J. P., Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J., and Risbey, J., 2005, Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system, Risk Analysis, 25(2), 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saltelli, A., Vidoni, D., Mascherini, M. (2009). Recommended practices in global sensitivity analysis. In: Baveye, P.C., Laba, M., Mysiak, J. (eds) Uncertainties in Environmental Modelling and Consequences for Policy Making. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2636-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics