Skip to main content

7 Diagnostische instrumenten

  • Chapter
Handboek dementie
  • 7498 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  • Alexopoulos GS, Abrams RC, Young RC, et al. Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Biol Psychiatry. 1988;23:271-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker JJ. Gedragsneurologie voor paramedici. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brod M, Stewart AL, Sands L, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: the Dementia Quality of Life instrument (DQoL). Gerontologist. 1999;39:25-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns A, Lawlor B, Craig S. Assessment Scales in Old Age Psychiatry. 2nd ed. London: Martin Dunitz; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mansfield J, Marx MS, Rosenthal, AS. A description of agitation in a nursing home. J.Gerontol. 1989;44:M77-M84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, et al. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44:2308-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesfeldt HF. A depression inventory for psychogeriatric patients. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1997;28:113-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, et al. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55:1621-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelinas I, Gauthier L, McIntyre M, et al. Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: the disability assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:471-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf A de, Deelman BG, Fens J. Cognitieve screening Test. Lisse: Swets en Zeitlinger (Harcourt); 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham DP, Cully JA, Snow AL, et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale: normative data for older adult controls. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18:236-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaxma R. Neurologie van cognitie en gedrag in hoofdlijnen. Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye SK, Dyck CH van, Alessi CA, et al. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:941-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Kalisvaart KJ, Timmers JF, et al. Delirium-O-Meter: a nurses’ rating scale for monitoring delirium severity in geriatric patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20:1158-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Kat MG, Kalisvaart CJ, et al. Neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire (NPI-Q): A validity study of the Dutch form. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2003;34:74-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Kat MG, Reus R de. Validity of the Behavior Observation Scale for Intramural Psychogeriatrics: a comparison with the BOP (Evaluation Scale Elderly Patients) and NOSIE-30 in a psychogeriatric assessment clinic for the elderly. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1994;25:110-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Kat MG, Rottier WP, et al. The Behavior Observation Scale for Intramural Psychogeriatrics and clinical diagnosis; a comparison with the BOP (Assessment Elderly Patients) and NOSIE-30. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1995;26:24-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Kat MG. Factor structure and validity of the Dutch version of the Cohen- Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-D). J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44: 888-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Ooms ME, Ribbe MW. Short version of the Dutch Behavioral Rating Scale for Psychogeriatric Inpatients (GIP-28). Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1997a;28:119-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Schmand B, Ooms ME, et al. Abbreviated form of the Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1997b;28:224-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de, Wetzels RB, Mulders A, et al. Validity of the Severe Impairment Battery Short Version. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe JF de. Differentiating between demented and psychiatric patients with the Dutch version of the IQCODE. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;12:462-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm AF, Jacomb PA. The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms. Psychol Med. 1989;19:1015-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm AF. The Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): a review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2004;16:275-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kat MG, Jonghe JF de, Aalten P, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: psychometric aspects of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Dutch version. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2002;33:150-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz S, Akpom CA. A measure of primary sociobiological functions. Int J Health Serv 1976;6:493-508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, et al. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the neuropsychiatric inventory. In Process Citation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12:233-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok RM, Verhey FR. Gestandaardiseerde Mini Mental State Examination; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok RM. Self-evaluation scales for depression in the elderly. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1994;25:150-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale. Psychiatry Res. 1991;38:143-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulen EF, Schmand B, Campen JP van, et al. The seven minute screen: a neurocognitive screening test highly sensitive to various types of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:700-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-Dassen M, Woods R, et al. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12:14-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43: 2412-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Geriatrie. CBO Richtlijn Diagnostiek en medicamenteuze behandeling van dementie. Alphen aan de Rijn: Van Zuiden Communications; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panisset M, Roudier M, Saxton J, et al. Severe impairment battery. A neuropsychological test for severely demented patients. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:41-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pot A. Caregivers’ perspectives. A longitudinal study on the psychological distress of informal caregivers of demented elderly. Academisch proefschrift VUA, Amsterdam; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg B, Borenstein J, Salob P, et al. Behavioral changes in patients with mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:9-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Leon MJ de, et al. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:1136-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooij SE de, Munster BC van, Korevaar JC, et al. Delirium subtype identification and the validation of the Delirium Rating Scale--Revised-98 (Dutch version) in hospitalized elderly patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:876-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton J, Kastango KB, Hugonot-Diener L, et al. Development of a short form of the Severe Impairment Battery. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13:999-1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmand B, Deelman BG, Hooijer C, et al. Item series of the cognitive screening test compared to those of the mini-mental status examination. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1996;27:29-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholzel-Dorenbos CJ. Measurement of quality of life in patients with dementia of Alzheimer type and their caregivers: Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL). Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2000;31:23-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Duursma SA. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: a screening instrument for delirium. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003;17:31-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclan SG, Reisberg B. Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Alzheimer’s disease: reliability, validity, and ordinality. Int Psychogeriatr. 1992;4:55-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkes SA, Lange-de Klerk ES de, Pijnenburg YA, et al. A systematic review of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales in dementia: room for improvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:7-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunisse S, Derix MM. The interview for deterioration in daily living activities in dementia: agreement between primary and secondary caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9:155-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunisse S, Haan R de, Walstra GM, et al. Behavioural problems in mild dementia: clinical relevance and methodological evaluation of the Revised Memory and Behavioral Problems Checklist. Teunisse S. Clinimetrics in dementia. Thesis. Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers J, Kalisvaart K, Schuurmans M, et al. A review of delirium rating scales. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2004;35:5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, et al. Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13:229-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhey FR, Houx P, Lang N van, et al. Cross-national comparison and validation of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale: results from the European Harmonization Project for Instruments in Dementia (EURO-HARPID). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19:41-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhey FR, Huppert FA, Korten EC, et al. Cross-national comparisons of the Cambridge Cognitive Examination-revised: the CAMCOG-R: results from the European Harmonization Project for Instruments in Dementia. Age Ageing. 2003;32:534-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Persoon JM, Felling AJ. Predictors of sense of competence in caregivers of demented persons. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:41-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraten PF, Eekelen CM van. Handleiding voor de GIP; Gedragsobservatieschaal voor de Intramurale Psychogeriatrie. Deventer: van Loghum Slaterus; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser PJ, Verhey FR, Scheltens P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Preclinical AD Scale (PAS) in cognitively mildly impaired subjects. J Neurol. 2002;249:312-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema SU, Jonghe JF de, Verhey FR, et al. Agitation in Dutch institutionalized patients with dementia: factor analysis of the Dutch version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007a;23:35-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema SU, Jonghe JF de, Verhey FR, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing home patients: factor structure invariance of the Dutch nursing home version of the neuropsychiatric inventory in different stages of dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007b;24:169-76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Bijlagen

Bijlagen

Bijlage 7.1 Toepassingsmogelijkheden en verkrijgbaarheid tests

Table 1 Toepassingmogelijkheden en verkrijgbaarheid tests.

Bijlage 7.2 Toepassingsmogelijkheden en verkrijgbaarheid beoordelingsschalen

Table 2 Toepassingmogelijkheden en verkrijgbaarheid beoordelingsschalen.

Bijlage 7.3 Subschalen gedragsobservatie intramurale psychogeriatrie (GIP)

figure 1

Bijlage 7.4 Subschalen neuropsychiatrische vragenlijst (NPI)

figure 2figure 2

Bijlage 7.5 Subschalen behave-AD

figure 4

Bijlage 7.6 Geriatric Sepression Scale (GDS)

figure 5

Bijlage 7.7 Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD)

figure 6
figure 7

Bijlage 7.8 Verkorte informant vragenlijst over cognitieve achteruitgang bij ouderen

figure 8figure 8figure 8

Bijlage 7.9 Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)

figure 11figure 11

Bijlage 7.10 Subschalen Revised Memory and Behavioral Problem Checklist (RMBPC)

figure 13figure 13figure 13

Bijlage 7.11 Ervaren Druk door Informele Zorg (EDIZ)

figure 16figure 16

Bijlage 7.12 Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)

figure 18figure 18

Bijlage 7.13 Deteroriation in Dagelijkse Levensverrichtingen bij Dementie (IDDD)

figure 20figure 20

Bijlage 7.14 Dementia Quality of Life Instrument (DQoL)

figure 22figure 22figure 22figure 22

Bijlage 7.15 Katz ADL-schaal

figure 26

Bijlage 7.16 Delier-O-Meter

figure 27figure 27figure 27

Bijlage 7.17 Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

figure 30figure 30

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Jonghe, J. (2009). 7 Diagnostische instrumenten. In: Jonker, C., Slaets, J., Verhey, F. (eds) Handboek dementie. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-8061-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-8061-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-313-6228-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-313-8061-9

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics