Skip to main content

General and Bionomic Analysis of the Landscape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape Bionomics Biological-Integrated Landscape Ecology
  • 995 Accesses

Abstract

Some indexes and measures of general ecology or even geomorphology can be used to quantify the landscape. For instance structural pattern analysis, climatic analysis, gravity model, diversity and dominance, grain and contrast. Other analysis derived from mathematics and in this chapter has more space: connection and fractal analysis. To study the LU connections we must apply the theory of graphs, as suggested by Forman and Godron. Fractal analysis is important, because it is the main geometry of natural systems, using fractional dimensions. Very useful is the fractal geometry for the evaluation of the irregular dispersion of patches in a territory, measured by counting the number of grid cells occupied by the mosaic, from low to high resolution.

The group of bionomic analysis derives directly from landscape bionomics. The influence field of a landscape element can be measured using a balance of BTC and the edge effect. The correlation HH/BTC allows to build a reliable model, expressed by a polynomial equation indicating the normal value of BTC per landscape type. Even the standard classes of BTC can be useful in the diagnosis of LU transformations. The landscape type evaluation (LTpE) classifies the characters of landscape in relation to HH as independent variable and is based on two indicators. It is needed before to make a detailed diagnosis, which is referred to ranges of normality per ecological parameter, thus to a precise landscape type. This chapter ends discussing the drawing analysis of the landscape. Konrad Lorenz wrote that it is essential for physicians, scholars of animals and landscape ecologists. Studies on nature should be accompanied by drawings and paintings available to give to a researcher a deeper observation capacity and the correct inspiration (sensu Einstein).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    IGM means Geographic Military Institute of Italy (analogous to other European Countries ones).

  2. 2.

    Together with Mallarmé and Picasso, the “avant-gardists” sustained that the forms of Creation have to be destroyed and that “nous ne cherchons pas, nos trouvons” (=we do not try, we find). This is quite presumptuous!

References

  1. Romani V (1988) Il paesaggio dell’Alto Garda bresciano: studio per un piano paesistico. Grafo ed, Brescia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Venanzoni R, Pedrotti F (1995) Il clima. In: Pignatti S (ed) Ecologia vegetale. Utet, Torino, pp 7–24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pignatti S (1995) Ecologia vegetale. UTET, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rivas-Martinez S (1995) Clasificación bioclimática de la Tierra. Folia Bot Matritensis 16:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingegnoli V, Giglio E (2005) Ecologia del Paesaggio: manuale per conservare, gestire e pianificare l’ambiente. Sistemi editoriali SE, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ingegnoli V (2002) Landscape ecology: a widening foundation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forman RTT (1995) Land Mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mandelbrot BB (1975) Les objets fractals: forme, hasard et dimension. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ingegnoli V (1993) Fondamenti di Ecologia del paesaggio. CittàStudi, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  11. Milne BT (1991) Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In: Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. Voss RF (1988) Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation. In: Peitgen HO, Saupe D (eds) The science of fractal images. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petersen RC (1991) The RCE: a riparian, channel and environmental inventory for small streams in agricultural landscape. Freshwat Biol 27:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siligardi M, Maiolini B (1993) L’inventario delle caratteristiche ambientali dei corsi d’acqua alpini: guida all’uso della scheda Rce-2. Biol Ambient VII(30):18–24

    Google Scholar 

  15. ANPA (2000) I.F.F. indice di funzionalità fluviale. Manuale ANPA, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  16. Godron M (1972) Echantillonage linéaire et cartographie. Investigacion Pesquera 36:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  17. Godron M, Bacou AM (1975) Sur les limites “optimales” séparant deux parties d’une biocénose hétérogène. Ann Univ Abidjan, Série E 8(1):317–324

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ingegnoli V (1991) Human influences in landscape change: thresholds of metastability. In: Ravera O (ed) Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: perturbation and recovery. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, pp 303–309

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ingegnoli V (1999) Definition and evaluation of the BTC (biological territorial capacity) as an indicator for landscape ecological studies on vegetation. In: Windhorst W, Enckell PH (eds) Sustainable landuse management: the challenge of ecosystem protection. EcoSys: Beitrage zur Oekosystemforschung, Suppl Bd 28, pp 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  20. Falinski JB (ed) (1994) Vegetation under the diverse anthropogenic impact as object of basic phytosociological map: result of the international cartographical experiment organized in Białowieża Forest. Supplementum Cartographiae Geobotanicae 4. Phytocoenosis 6 (NS)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Forman RTT (2008) Urban regions, ecology and planning beyond the city. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Lorenz K (1978) Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung: Grundlagen der Ethologie. Springer, Wien

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartmann N (1964) Der Aufbau der realen Welt. De Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Goodall J, Berman P (1999) Reason for hope. Waren Book, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goodall J (2000) 40 years at Gombe. Stewart, Tabori, and Chang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pauli W (1959) Aufsätze Vortäge uber Physik und Erkenntnistheorie. Tr. It. Fisica e conoscenza. Boringhieri, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  27. Einstein A (1965) Pensieri degli anni difficili. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cicero MT (I sec.) De Natura Deorum, II, XXXVIII, 96 (many editions)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ingegnoli, V. (2015). General and Bionomic Analysis of the Landscape. In: Landscape Bionomics Biological-Integrated Landscape Ecology. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5226-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics