Skip to main content

The Perineal Approach to Rectal Prolapse

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Disorders

Abstract

Surgical treament of rectal prolapse has unpredictable results, whatever approach the surgeon decides to use. Perineal operations are safer than abdominal ones but carry a higher likelihood of recurrence of the prolapse. Functional results probably depend more on the initial severity of the disorder than on the type of operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hoel AT, Skarstein A, Ovrebo KK. Prolapse of the rectum, long-term results of surgical treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:201–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(8):CD001758.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oliver GC, Vachon D, Eisenstat TE et al. Delorme’s procedure for complete rectal prolapse in severely debilitated patients. An analysis of 41 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37: 461–467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lechaux JP, Lechaud P, Perez M. Results of Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of a modified technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:301–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N et al. Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1260–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pascual Montero JA, Martinez Puente MC, Pascual I et al. Complete rectal prolapse: clinical and functional outcome with Delorme’s procedure. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006; 98:837–843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lieberth M, Kondylis LA, Reilly JC, Kondylis PD. The Delorme repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a retrospective review. Am J Surg 2009;197:418–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Altemeier WA, Giuseffi J, Hoxworth P. Treatment of extensive prolapse of the rectum in aged or debilitated patients. AMA Arch Surg 1952;65:72–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Altemeier WA, Hoxworth P, Giuseffi J. Further experiences with the treatment of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Clin North Am 1955; Nationwide No:1437–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Alexander JW. One-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Twelve years’ experience. Arch Surg 1964;89:6–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Barbieri S, Roviaro G. Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier’s procedure: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:652–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R. The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:565–570.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ et al. Recurrence and quality of life following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1446–1451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Altomare DF, Binda G, Ganio E et al, Rectal Prolapse Study Group. Long-term outcome of Altemeier’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;54:698–703.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shoab SS, Saravanan B, Neminathan S, Grsaa T. Thiersch repair of a spontaneous rupture of rectal prolapse with evisceration of small bowel through anus-a case report. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:W6–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams NS, Giordano P, Dvorkin LS et al. External pelvic rectal suspension (the Express procedure) for full tickness rectal prolapse: evolution of a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:307–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Romano G, Bianco F, Caggiano L. Modified perineal stapled rectal resection with Contour Transtar for full tickness rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:878–881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parés D, Vial M, Grande L. An alternative management for high-risk patients with rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:531–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trompetto, M., Cornaglia, S. (2010). The Perineal Approach to Rectal Prolapse. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P., Bartram, C.I. (eds) Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_69

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1541-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1542-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics