Skip to main content

Production Potential and Logistics of Biomass Feedstocks for Biofuels

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practices and Perspectives in Sustainable Bioenergy

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 434 Accesses

Abstract

Intensive biofuel production and utilization require an adequate and sustainable supply of biomass feedstocks. Globally, net terrestrial primary production is estimated at 56 × 1015 g C yr−1, storing 2.2 × 1021 J bioenergy in the annually synthesized biomass. Approximately 8.7% of this primary production can be sustainably used for energy purposes to meet 34% of the current human energy demand. Sustainable bioenergy feedstocks extend to feasible portion of food grains, crop residues, dedicated energy crops, forest debris, animal manures, and domestic organic waste. To transfer biomass feedstocks from the production field to biorefinery plants, an array of unit operations are involved, including harvesting, drying, transportation, densification, storage, and pre-processing. Machineries and equipments have been developed to implement the feedstock logistics. The overall biomass handling cost accounts for 35–50% of the total biomass production budget. Biomass logistics are a critical component in a biofuel production system and an essential part of the bioenergy supply chain. Technological advancement is warranted to improve the efficiency of biomass feedstock logistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamson LP, Volk TV, Smart LB, Cameron KB (2010) Shrub Willow biomass producer’s handbook. State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton S, Cassidy P (2007) Energy basics. In: Hubbard W, Biles L, Mayfield C, Ashton S (eds) Sustainable forestry for bioenergy and bio-based products: trainers curriculum notebook. Southern Forest Research Partnership, Athens, GA, USA, pp 189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale CV, Long SP (1995) Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy-conversion in cool climate? Agric For Meteorol 96:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E et al (2010) Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329:834–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton JR, Hall DO (1991) The maximum efficiency of photosynthesis. Photochem Photobio 53:545–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadmeadow M, Matthews R (2003) Forests, carbon and climate change: the UK contribution. Information Note 48. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Matson PA, Vitousek PM (2011) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, New York, NY, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Lickfield GC, Yang CQ (2004) Molecular modeling of cellulose in amorphous state. Part I: model building and plastic deformation study. Polymer 45:1063–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Parish ES, Kline KL (2014) Risks to global biodiversity from fossil-fuel production exceed those from biofuel production. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 9(2):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornburg V, van Vuuren D, van de Ven G et al (2010) Bioenergy revisited: key factors in global potential of bioenregy. Energy Environ Sci 3:258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy M (2008) Estimated costs for production, storage and transportation of switchgrass. File A1-22. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2013) International Energy Outlook 2013. USA, U.S, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2016) Monthly biodiesel production report. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA. http://www.eia.gov/biofuels/biodiesel/production/biodiesel.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2016

  • Enerdata (2015) Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2015. Enerdata Information Services, London, UK. https://yearbook.enerdata.net/ (accessed 11 Apr. 2016)

  • EPA (2015) Ag 101. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/ag_101_agriculture_us_epa_0.pdf/. Accessed 11 Apr 2016

  • FAO (1997) Renewable biological systems for alternative sustainable energy production. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin-128. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013) FAOStat—Forestry database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P (1998) Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes RG, Taliaferro CM (2002) Biomass yield stability of switchgrass cultivars. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, USA, pp 276–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo M, Song W, Buhain J (2015) Bioenergy and biofuels: history, status, and perspective. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 42:712–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Beringer T, Bhattacharya SC, Erb KH, Hoogwijk M (2011) The global technical potential of bio-energy in 2050 considering sustainability constraints. Curr Opin Environ Sust 2:394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F et al (2013) Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? Environ Res Lett 8:031004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadrich JC, Harrigan TM, Wolf CA (2010) Economic comparison of liquid manure transport and land application. Appl Eng Agri 26:743–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrill H (2010) Costs and productivity of woody biomass harvesting in integrated stand conversion and residue recovery operations. Master degree thesis. Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess JR, Wright CT, Kenny KL (2007) Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production. Biofuel Bioprod Bioref 1:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstrand D, Edwards W (2009) Computing a grain storage rental rate. File C2-24. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstrand D, Wisner B (2009) Cost of storage grain. File A2-33. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijgen W, de Wild P, Reith H (2010) Lignin production by organosolv fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass. In: International Biomass Valorisation Congress, 13–15 Sept 2010, Amsterdam, The Netherland

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2013a) World energy outlook 2013. International Energy Agency, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2013b) Resources to reserves 2013. International Energy Agency, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2013c) Medium-term renewable energy market report 2013. International Energy Agency, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • IIASA (2012) Global energy assessment—toward a sustainable future. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013—the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISU Extension (2008) Soybean drying and storage. Pm-1636. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, IA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Dhungana B, Clifton-Brown J (2008) Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois. Biomass Bioenerg 32:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klass DL (1998) Biomass for renewable energy, fuels, and chemicals. Academic Press, San Diego, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen EF (2003) Harvesting and handling of miscanthus. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Bygholm, Denmark. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:34053992. Accessed 11 Apr 2016

  • Lindsey R (2009) Climate and Earth’s energy budget. The Earth observatory. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt, MD, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin K, Campbell J, Simpson G, Donald J (2008) Managing broiler litter in poultry houses. Poult Eng Econ Manag Newsl 56:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 281:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore R, Clark WD, Kingsley RS (1995) Botany. William C. Brown Pub, Madison, WI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • OCES (2010) Switchgrass production guide for Oklahoma. E-1020. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Stillwater, OK, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ort DR, Zhu XG, Melis A (2011) Optimizing antenna size to maximize photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Physiol 155:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSU Extension (2011) Dry corn in the field or in a grain dryer? C.O.R.N Newsletter 2011-34. Ohio State University Cooperative Extension, Columbus, OH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedade MTF, Junk WJ, Long SP (1991) The productivity of the C4 grass Echinochloa polystachya on the Amazon floodplain. Ecology 72:1456–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirraglia A, Gonzalez R, Saloni D (2010) Techno-economic analysis of wood pellets production for U.S. manufacturers. BioResources 5:2374–2390

    Google Scholar 

  • Prairie Grains (2006) Harvest tips and storage. Prairie Grains Magazine, Issue 78. http://www.smallgrains.org/springwh/Summer06/harvest/harvest.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2016

  • Price M (2011) Wood chips drying. Project Report FCPR045. Forestry Commission Scotland, Delamere, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue Extension (2008) The economics of renewable energy: switchgrass and corn stover. ID-404-W. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue Extension (2011) Properties of wood waste stored for energy production. ID-421-W. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyter R, Voigt T, Heaton E et al (2008) Growing giant miscanthus in Illinois. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyter R, Voigt T, Heaton E, Dohleman F, Long S (2007) Giant miscanthus: biomass crop for Illinois. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Issues in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, USA, pp 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, McDow W (2013) The wood pellet value chain. U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities, Greenville, SC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • RFA (2016) World fuel ethanol production industry statistics. Renewable Fuel Association, Washington, DC, USA. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/resources/industry/statistics. Accessed 14 Apr 2016

  • Salassi ME, Deliberto MA (2013) Surgar cane production in Louisiana. A.E.A. Information Series No. 290. Louisiana State University, Barton Rouge, LA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson MA, Egg RP, Wiselogel AE (1997) Biomass losses during harvest and storage of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg 12:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sannigrahi P, Ragauskas AJ, Tuskan GA (2010) Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: a review of compositional characteristics. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 4:209–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short H (2009) Pipes, trains, trucks: how to move biomass more cost effectively?. University of Michigan, Ana Arbor, MI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sistani KR, Brink GE, McGowen SL et al (2003) Characterization of broiler cake and broiler litter, the byproducts of two management practices. Bioresour Technol 90:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BJ, Murck BW (2011) The blue planet: introduction to Earth system science. Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2010) Energy transitions: history, requirements, prospects. Praeger Publishers, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Turhollow A et al (2009) Large-scale production, harvest, and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)—current technology and envisioning a mature technology. Biofuel Bioprod Bioref 3:124–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon B, Luzadis VA (2009) Renewable energy from forest resources in the United States. Routledge, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabil L, Adapa P, Kashaninejad M (2011) Biomass feedstock pre-processing—Part 1: pre-treatment. In: Bernardes MA (ed) Biofuel’s engineering process technology. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 411–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend PA, Kar SP, Miller RO (2014) Poplar (Populus spp.) trees for biofuel production. eXtension, Lincoln, NE, USA. https://www.extension.org/pages/70456/poplar-populus-spp-trees-for-biofuel-production#.U91QjOLD-ft. Accessed 11 Apr 2016

  • UIUC (2008) Machinery cost estimates: harvesting. Farm business management. University of Illinois Extension, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2012) Grain transportation report. Agricultural Marketing Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA. https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/transportation-analysis/gtr. Accessed 11 Apr 2016

  • Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, Fabio E et al. (2012) Impact of willow crop management activities on willow economics. Short Rotation Woody Crops Operations Working Group Conference. Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 5–8 November 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk TA, Abrahamson PA, Cameron KD et al (2011) Yields of willow biomass crops across a range of sites in North America. Aspects Appl Biology 112:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • WEC (2013) World energy resources: bioenergy. London, UK, World Energy Council

    Google Scholar 

  • White MS, Curtis ML, Sarles RL, Green DW (1983) Effects of outside storage on the energy potential of hardwood particulate fuels: Part II higher and net heating values. Forest Prod J 33:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiatrak P, Frederick JR (2014) Corn harvest. Clemson Cooperative Extension, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. http://www.clemson.edu/extension/rowcrops/corn/guide/corn_harvest.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2016

  • Woolf D, Amonete JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:56. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2013) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2008) What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardi F, Viggiano D, Nanna F et al (1999) Steam explosion of straw in batch and continuous systems. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support to compiling the information was from the USDA-AFRI competitive grant No. 2011-67009-30055.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingxin Guo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Review Questions

  1. 1.

    Briefly describe the energy budget of the Earth system.

  2. 2.

    Define photosynthesis efficiency. What is the photosynthesis efficiency of intensively cultivated crops?

  3. 3.

    Globally, how much solar energy is captured by plants, algae, and cyanobacteria through photosynthesis each year?

  4. 4.

    What is the net annual primary production of terrestrial plants?

  5. 5.

    What is the global sustainable bioenergy production potential? Is this figure significant in the current global energy demand?

  6. 6.

    What biomass materials are identified as bioenergy feedstocks?

  7. 7.

    What are biomass logistics? Name the typical operations of biomass logistics.

  8. 8.

    Explain the general logistics of switchgrass production for bioethanol.

  9. 9.

    What equipment is commonly used for collecting and densifying woody biomass in the field?

  10. 10.

    What techniques have been tested to pre-process lignocellulosic materials for bioethanol generation?

Index

Biomass:

Bioenergy

Biofuel:

Densification

Harvesting:

Logistics

Pelletization:

Photosynthesis

Pre-processing:

Production

Storage:

Transportation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature India Private Limited

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Song, W., Apointe, R., Guo, M. (2020). Production Potential and Logistics of Biomass Feedstocks for Biofuels. In: Mitra, M., Nagchaudhuri, A. (eds) Practices and Perspectives in Sustainable Bioenergy. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3965-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3965-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3963-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3965-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics