Abstract
Documenting the shifts from national to supra-national influences on education policy in India, this chapter focuses on the nuances of the accepted common sense of educational accountability, efficiency, privatisation and deregulation. I concentrate on the social biography of target-driven programmes in India such as Operation Blackboard (OB) and District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) that occupied the place left vacant by national policy generation. The chapter also identifies some of the important moments in the establishment of Education for All (EFA) and points out the ways in which the ideal of inclusion, for instance, has become part of the globally dominant policy structure. The continuation of target-driven programmes in India points out the steady gain of ground by neoliberal ideas of good education. In this context, the poor are constructed as aspiring and entrepreneurial by almost removing poverty from its material and historical determinants and transposing it in the realm of business opportunities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The choice of district as a unit of governance has its own problems/limitations. While districts are smaller governing bodies in comparison to state/central units, they cannot be termed as “local” units for most districts are comprised of numerous small towns and villages. The large populations of some districts pose further problems regarding the scope and effectiveness of decentralised planning at the district level.
References
Amin, S. (1976). Unequal development: An essay on the social formations of peripheral capitalism (B. Pierce, Trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.
Amin, S. (2006). The millennium development goals: A critique from the south. Monthly Review, 57(10).
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (2001). Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ball, S. J. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 119–129.
Batra, P. (2005). Voice and agency of teachers: The missing link in the National Curriculum Framework. In Economic and political weekly. 1–7, October (pp. 4347–4356).
Brock-Utne, B. (2000). Whose education for all? New York: Falmer.
Buchert, L. (1995). Recent trends in education aid: Towards a classification of policies. Paris: UNESCO/IIEP.
Carnoy, M., & Castells, M. (2002). Globalization, the knowledge society, and the network state: Poulantzas at the millennium. Global Networks, 1(1), 1–18.
Dahlman, C., & Utz, A. (2004). India and the knowledge economy: Leveraging strengths and opportunities (World Bank Report, 31267-IN). Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/05/20/000012009_20050520110005/Rendered/INDEX/312670IN.txt.
DALE, R. (1999). Specifying globalization effects on national policy: A focus on the mechanisms. Journal of Educational policy, 14(1), 1–17.
Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda?”. Educational Theory., 50(4), 427–448.
David, P., & Foray, D. (2003). Economic fundamentals of the knowledge society. Policy Futures in Education, 1(1), 20–49.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Geetha Rani, P. (2003). Financing primary education and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. New Delhi: National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.
Joseph, G. (2016, July 15–22). Teach for America has gone global, and its board has strange ideas about what poor kids need. The Nation. issue https://www.thenation.com/article/teach-for-america-has-gone-global-and-its-board-has-strange-ideas-about-what-poor-kids-need/.
Kamat, S. (2002). Deconstructing the rhetoric of decentralization: The state in education reform. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 2(2), 110–119.
Kumar, R. (2015). Education, the state, and market: Anatomy of neoliberal impact. Critical Education, 6(21), 1–13.
Kumar, K., Priyam, M. and Saxena, S. (2001, Feb 17–23). Looking beyond the smokescreen: DPEP and primary education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(7), 560–568.
Lingard, B., & Rizvi, F. (1998). Globalisation and the fear of homogenisation in education. Change: Transformation in Education, 1(1), 62–71.
Majumdar, M., & Mooij, J. (2011). Education and inequality in India. A classroom view. London: Routledge.
Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2005). Interrogating global flows in higher education. Globalisation Societies and Education, 3(3), 281–309.
Mehta, L. (2001). World Bank and its growing knowledge empire. Human Organization., 60(2), 189–197.
Nawani, D. (2018). Is there a learning crisis in our schools? India Seminar, 706.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world's poor profitably. Harvard Business Review., 80(9), 4–11.
Prashad, V. (2007). The darker nations: A People’s history of the third world. New York: The New Press.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York: Routledge.
Rutkowsky, D. (2007). Converging us softly: How intergovernmental organizations promote neoliberal educational policy. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 229–247.
Sadgopal, A. (2006). Post-Jomtien reflection on the education policy. In R. Kumar (Ed.), The crisis of elementary education in India. New Delhi: SAGE.
Sarangapani, P., & Vasavi, A. R. (2003). Aided Programmes or Guided Policies?: DPEP in Karnataka. Economic and Political Weekly., 38(32), 3401–3408.
Shiva Kumar, A. K., De, A., Dreze, J., Samson, M. & Dasgupta, S. (2009, March 14–27). ‘Education for all’ is the policy, but what is the Reality? Frontline 26(6): 88–92.
Singh, M. (2005). Meeting basic learning needs in the informal sector: Integrating education and training for decent work, empowerment and citizenship. Dordrecht: Springer.
Spring, J. (2014). Globalization of Education: An Introduction (sociocultural, political, and historical studies in education). New York: Routledge.
Spring, J. (2015). Globalization of education: An introduction (sociocultural, political, and historical studies in education). New York: Routledge.
Steiner –Khamsi, G. (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers College Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). For all by all? The World Bank’s global framework for education. In S. J. Klees, J. Samoff, & N. Stromquist (Eds.), The World Bank and education critiques and alternatives. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Stiglitz, J. (2002). Public policy for knowledge economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Thapliyal, N. (2015). Privatized rights, segregated childhoods: A critical analysis of neoliberal education policy in India. In K. Kallio, S. Mills, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Politics, citizenship and rights. Geographies of children and young people (Vol. 7). Singapore: Springer.
United Nations. (2015). The millennium development goals report. New York: United Nations.
Verger, A. (2012). Framing and selling global education policy: The promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low-income contexts. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 109–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature India Private Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tukdeo, S. (2019). Script and Screenplay: International Actors. In: India Goes to School. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3957-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3957-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3955-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3957-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)