Abstract
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the training performance for three important types of neural networks, namely Feed Forward neural network, Elman neural network, and Radial Basis Function neural network. In order to do this analysis, the authors performed sequential training of all the three neural networks for monitoring the congestion level in the transmission lines of the power system under study. This is accomplished through neural network simulation on the IEEE 30-bus test system under various operating conditions, namely base case, higher loading scenario, and contingency conditions. The findings of this study justify two things. On one hand, the results reveal that all the three neural networks yield successful training and are capable of reducing both the complexity and computational time as compared to the conventional iterative power flow simulation. Furthermore, the comparative analysis justifies that the radial basis function neural network is the fastest of all the three neural networks considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Canizares CA, Hong C, Milano F, Singh A. Transmission congestion management and pricing in simple auction electricity markets. Int. J. Emerg Electric Power Syst 2004;1(1):1–10.
Conejo AJ, Milano F, Raquel G. Congestion management ensuring voltage stability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2006;21(1):357–364.
Venkatarajan SS, Thiyagarajan J. A congestion line flow control in deregulated power system. Serbian J Electr Eng. 2011;8(2):203–12.
Yousefi A, Nguyen TT, Zarei H, Malik OP. Congestion management using demand response and FACTS devices. Electr Power Energy Syst. 2012;37(1):78–85.
Rajathy R, Harish K. Power Flow Tracing Based Congestion Management Using Differential Evolution in Deregulated Electricity Market. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. 2012;4(2):371–92.
Aswani K, Srivastava SC, Singh SN. Congestion management in competitive power market: a bibliographical survey. Electr Power Syst Res. 2005;76:153–64.
Iman S, Abbas K, Rene F. Radial basis function neural network application to power system restoration studies. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2012;1:1–10.
Bahamanyar AR, Karami A. Power system voltage stability monitoring using artificial neural networks with a reduced set of inputs. Electr Power Energy Syst. 2014;58:246–56.
Zhou DQ, Annakkage UD, Rajapakse AD. Online monitoring of voltage stability margin using an artificial neural network. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2010;25(3):1566–74.
Aswani K, Srivastava SC, Singh SN. A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2004;19(1):554–62.
Yingzhong G, Xie L, Brett R, Hesselbaek B. Congestion-induced wind curtailment: sensitivity analysis case studies. In: Proceedings of the North American power symposium; 2011. 1–7.
Panda RP, Sahoo PK, Satpathy PK, Paul S. Analysis of critical conditions in electric power systems by feed forward and layer recurrent neural networks. Int J Electr Eng Inf. 2014;6(3):447–459.
Pandey SN, Tapaswi S, Srivastava L. Price prediction based congestion management using growing RBF neural network. In: Proceedings of the annual IEEE India conference; 2008. p. 482–7.
Alberto B, Maurizio D, Marco M, Marco SP, Politecnico M. Congestion management in a zonal market by a neural network approach. Eur Trans Electr Power. 2009;19(4):569–84.
Xue L, Jia C, Dajun D. Comparison of Levenberg-Marquardt method and path following interior point method for the solution of optimal power flow problem. Emerg Electr Power Syst. 2012;13(3):15–35.
Ilamathi B, Selladurai VG, Balamurugan K. ANN-SQP Approach for NOx emission reduction in coal fired Boilers. Emerg Electr Power Syst. 2012;13(3):1–14.
Keib AAE, Ma X. Application of artificial neural networks in voltage stability assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1995;10(4):1890–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sahoo, P.K., Panda, R., Satpathy, P.K., Mohanty, M.N. (2016). Performance Comparison for Feed Forward, Elman, and Radial Basis Neural Networks Applied to Line Congestion Study of Electrical Power Systems. In: Dash, S., Bhaskar, M., Panigrahi, B., Das, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Computations in Engineering Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 394. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2656-7_112
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2656-7_112
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2654-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2656-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)