Abstract
Product companies generally see sustainability as a burden limiting their design process, similar to cost or safety limits. A method for sustainable design was created, attempting to turn sustainability from a burden into an innovation tool with inherent business value. The method combines creative whole-systems thinking with quantitative sustainability metrics. It facilitates innovation by the creation of visual whole-system maps that encourage more thorough and more radical brainstorming. It facilitates sustainability by using quantitative measurements, such as life-cycle assessment or point-based certification systems, to set priorities and choose final designs. The method has been anecdotally tested in classes at four universities, and many of the companies partnering with these classes have said the students provided both sustainability and feature /functionality benefits. This paper also compares the method to Lindahl’s nine recommendations for being useful to engineering designers. Thus there is at least anecdotal evidence that the design method may turn sustainability from a burden into an innovation tool. Future studies should compare the method against industry-leading innovation and green design methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
US Green Building Council, Three Billion Square Feet of Green Building Space LEED-Certified [Press Release]. Accessed 14 April 2014 from http://www.usgbc.org/articles/three-billion-square-feet-green-building-space-leed%AE-certified
Behrisch, J., Ramirez, M., Giurco, D.: The use of ecodesign strategies and tools: State of the art in industrial design praxis. In: Proceedings of the ERSCP-EMSU Conference, Delft. 25–29 Oct 2010
Behrisch, J., Ramirez, M., Giurco, D.: Representation of ecodesign practice: international comparison of industrial design consultancies. Sustainability 3(10), 1778–1791 (2011)
Bansal, P.: The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy. Manage. Executive. 16(2), 122–131 (2002)
Hauschild, M., et al.: From life cycle assessment to sustainable production: status and perspectives. CIRP Ann. Manufact. Technol. 54(2), 1–21 (2005)
Millet, D., Bistagnino., et al.: Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs?, J. Clean. Prod. 15(4): 335–346 (2007)
Centre for Sustainable Design: Sustainable Innovation 2014 conference website. http://cfsd.org.uk/events/sustainable-innovation-2014/. Accessed on 14 May 2014
Collado-Ruiz, D., Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi, H.: Influence of environmental information on creativity. Des. Stud. 31(5), 479–498 (2010)
Waage, S.A.: Re-considering product design: a practical ‘road-map’ for integration of sustainability issues. J. Clean. Prod. 15(7), 638–649 (2007)
Benyus, J.: Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, Harper Perennial (1997)
Cook, D.: The Natural Step: Towards a Sustainable Society, Green Books (2004)
Crul, M., Diehl, J. C.: Design for Sustainability: A Practical Approach For Developing Economies, UNEP/Earthprint (2006)
Lovins, A., et al.: Factor Ten Engineering Design Principles, Rocky Mountain Institute (2010)
MBDC, LLC.: Overview of the Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Standard. Accessed 14 May 2014 from http://www.c2ccertified.org/images/uploads/C2CCertified_V3_Overview_121113.pdf (2012)
IEEE Standards Board, IEEE 1680: Standard for Environmental Assessment of Personal Computer Products, Including Laptop Personal Computers, Desktop Personal Computers, and Personal Computer Monitors, IEEE (2006)
Baines, T.S. et al.: State-of-the-art in product-service systems. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 221, no. 10, pp. 1543–1552 (2007)
Hart, S.L., Ahuja, G.: Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy. Environ. 5(1), 30–37 (1996)
Konar, S., Cohen, M.A.: Does the market value environmental performance? Rev. Econ. Stat. 83(2), 281–289 (2001)
Kim, W.C., Mauborgne, R.: Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy. Sloan. Manag. Rev. 40, 41–54 (1999)
Roos, J. (Ed.): Intellectual capital, Macmillan (1997)
Lindahl, M.: Engineering designers’ experience of design for environment methods and tools–Requirement definitions from an interview study. J. Clean. Prod. 14(5), 487–496 (2006)
Menter, A.: Autodesk sustainability workshop: advancing the practice of sustainable engineering through education. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST) pp. 1–6 (2011)
Eggermont, M., Rosehart, W. B.: Integration of desired learning outcomes in a first year design course. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2012)
Faludi, J.: Sustainable design education through modular online content. Soc. Info. Technol. Teacher Edu. Int. Conf. 2012(1), 3599–3601 (2012)
Schlecht, L. L.A.: Impact of prototyping resource environments on idea generation in product design, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013)
Unknown,: Reviews and Resources, J. Edu. Sustain. Develop. 6: 161 (2012)
Goedkoop, M., Spriensma, R.: The Eco-Indicator99: A Damage Oriented Method For Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Pré Consultants (2001)
Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., et al.: Recipe 2008. A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level, Pré Consultants (2009)
Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P.: Give design a break? the role of incubation periods during idea generation, DS 58-2. In: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design Theory and Research Methodology, vol. 2, pp. 24–27 (2009)
Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P.: The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. J. Creative. Behav 45(2), 130–146 (2011)
Meadows, D.: Leverage points. Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute, Hartland, Vermont, USA (1999)
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Adam Menter and Dawn Danby of Autodesk for their support of the method.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Faludi, J. (2015). A Sustainable Design Method Acting as an Innovation Tool. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) ICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 2. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 35. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2228-6
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2229-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)