Abstract
This article gives an overview of the current rich-dome combustion system design, requirements and challenges; followed by the first alternative to rich-domes that have been successfully introduced as products; the lowest levels of achievable NOx (so called entitlement) as determined from small scale rig testing; summary of recent engine emissions data with “green” alternative fuels; description of the 2nd alternative to rich-dome products that may be of interest to the OEM’s for the N+2 and N+3 generation aviation engines; a brief discussion on the modeling and correlation accuracy expectations from future efforts in this area; the 3rd alternative to rich domes which was shown promising for autoignition times closer to 0.2 ms. The article concludes with a short section on operability and dynamics. Several large low-NOx rich domes’ takeoff NOx emission index is reproduced well by a simple correlation NO x RD −L = 0.0303PR 1.9722 w / R 2 = 0.9906 including Talon II and Trent1000. However, the LTO NOx is correlated well by a similarly good quality curve only for the group of combustors without Trent1000, DP / F 00 = 0.6793PR 1.2241 compared to lower value expression for Trent1000 alone given by DP / F 00 = 0.1292PR 1.6327. Consistent with the NOx stringency pattern set by CAEP4, CAEP6 and CAEP8 and longtime goal for achieving 85 % reduction in takeoff NOx at 30OPR, we propose the long-term LTO regulatory standard of CAEP / 18 = −37.763 + 2π effective December 31, 2033. The combustor inlet temperatures for desired overall pressure ratio at sea-level standard day static condition can be estimated by using T 3,SSS = 317.544OPR 0.2704; 320.1955OPR 0.272, respectively for the N+1 and N+2 generation engines. This along with generally accepted requirements for combustor operability, we have to manage significantly increased range of P3, T3 and fuel/air ratio, viz. T3: 216.67–1084 K; P3: 0.33–60 atm; ΔP: ~ (0.1–1.2) ΔPdesign; and FAR: FARmin - FARmax. The numerical values of the dome design pressure drop (ΔPdesign), minimum and maximum fuel air ratios (FARmin and FARmax) depend upon the combustion system design and its potential applications. We will assume typical values of these variables, respectively, 3–5 %, 0.005–008 and 0.025–0.040 for the aviation engines. The 1st generation of lean dome products met their original objectives of achieving lower NOx within the specified design constraints including cooling technology. They were immediately followed by the 2nd generation lean dome products known popularly as TAPS in GEnx in addition to planned LEAP-X and GE9X. The takeoff NOx of GEnx is given by NOx GEnx = 1.079 × 10-5 OPR 3.971 W / R 2 = 0.991. These products will be able to meet the proposed long-term LTO NOx regulatory standard within the generally accepted design modification and refinement process. TALON-X and recently introduced P&W TALON-Axially Staged Combustion concept will provide credible alternatives to TAPS; an interesting technologies competition. The 2nd generation lean domes produce an order of magnitude lower exhaust smoke number than the rich domes. For all other design requirements both the lean and rich domes have comparable characteristics. The effect of FT fuel blends on combustion efficiency and NOx is insignificant; but its benefits in regard to particulate emissions are enormous in terms of both the number density and mass emissions due primarily to significantly lower aromatic and sulfur contents. Future CFD and semi-empirical model should be developed with the proposed long term accuracy goal expressed in term of the standard deviation σ goal: 3 % of takeoff NOx, 7.5 % and 15 % respectively of idle CO and HC emission indices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acosta WA (1987) Liner cooling research at NASA Lewis Research Center. AIAA paper 1987-1828
Ajmani K, Breisacher K (2014) Simulations of NO x emissions from low emissions discrete jet injector combustor tests. AIAA paper 2014-3524
Ajmani K, Mongia HC, Lee P (2013a) Evaluation of CFD best practices for combustor design: part I—non-reacting flows. AIAA paper 2013-1144
Ajmani K, Mongia HC, Lee P (2013b) CFD best practices to predict NO x , CO and lean blowout for combustor design. GT2013-9566
Ajmani K, Mongia HC, Lee P (2013c) Evaluation of a time-filtered Navier stokes (TFNS) CFD approach for LDI combustor analysis. AIAA paper 2013-3688
Ajmani K, Mongia H, Lee P (2014) CFD computations of emissions for LDI-2 combustors with simplex and air blast injectors. AIAA paper 2014-3529
Anonymous (1982) Design documentation report, counterflow film-cooled combustor program. Report 21-4007-A, Garrett Turbine Engine Co., Phoenix, AZ, June 1982, (NASA CR-167922)
Arvai ES (2011). http://airinsight.com/2011/11/09/comparing-the-new-technology-narrow-body-engines-gtf-vs-leap-maintenance-costs/#.U8KShPldU00. Accessed on 9 Nov 2011
Bahr DW, Gleason CC (1973) Experimental clean combustor program, phase I—final report. NASA CR-134737, July 1973
Bahr DW, Gleason CC (1975) Experimental clean combustor program, phase I—final report. NASA CR-134737
Bester N, Yates A (2009) Assessment of the operational performance of fischer–tropsch synthetic–paraffinic kerosene in a T63 gas turbine compared to conventional Jet A-1 fuel. GT2009-60333
Bruce TW, Davis FG, Kuhn TE, Mongia HC (1977) Pollution reduction technology program small jet engines (PRTP) phase I final report. NASA CR-135214, Sept 1977
Bruce TW, Davis FG, Kuhn TE, Mongia HC (1978) PRTP phase II final report. NASA CR-159415, Sept 1978
Bruce TW, Davis FG, Kuhn TE, Mongia HC (1981) PRTP phase III final report. NASA CR-165386, Dec 1981
Bulzan D et al (2010) Gaseous and particulate emissions results of the NASA alternative aviation fuel experiment (AAFEX). GT2010-23524
Burrus DL et al (1984) Energy efficient engine combustion system component technology performance report. NASA CR-168274, July 1984
Carter NA et al (2011) Energy and environmental viability of select alternative jet fuel pathways. AIAA 2011-5968
Chishty WA et al (2011) Emissions assessment of alternative aviation fuel at simulated altitudes. GT2011-45113
Caux-Brisebois V et al (2013) Thermo-acoustic coupling in swirl-stabilized flames with helical vortices. AIAA Paper 2013-3650
Corporan E, DeWitt MJ, Wagner M (2004) Evaluation of soot particulate mitigation additives in a T63 engine. Fuel Process Technol. 85:727–742
Culick F, Heitor MV, Whitelaw JH (eds) (1993) Unsteady Combustion. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute. Series: NATO science series E, vol 306, Praia da Granja, Portugal, 6–17 Sept 1993
Danis AM, Pritchard BA, Mongia HC (1996) Empirical and semi-empirical correlation of emissions data from modern turbo propulsion gas turbine engines. ASME paper 96-GT-0186
Davison CR, Chisty WA (2011) Altitude performance of a turbojet with alternate fuels. GT2011-45132
Diehl LA, Biaglow JA (1974) Measurement of gaseous emissions from a turbofan engine at simulated altitude conditions. NASA TM X-3046, April 1974
Dolan B et al (2013) Biofuel emissions of a multipoint staged low NO X combustion system at intermediate pressures. AIAA paper 2013-3651
Dryer FL (2014) Chemical kinetic and combustion characteristics of transportation fuels. In: Plenary paper, combustion (international) symposium
Dubiel DJ (1986) Energy efficient engine combustion system component technology performance program. NASA CR-179533, Sept 1986
Fear JS (1976) The NASA pollution-reduction technology program for small jet aircraft engines—a status report. NASA-TM-X-73419, July 1976
Foust MJ, Thomsen D, Stickles R, Cooper C, Dodds W (2012) Development of the GE aviation low emissions TAPS combustor for next generation aircraft engines. AIAA-2012-0936
Fureby C (2012) A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for a swirl stabilized flame. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 134: 041503-1–041503-13
Gejji R, Huang C, Yoon C, Anderson W (2014) A parametric study of combustion dynamics in a single-element lean direct injection (LDI) gas turbine combustor. AIAA paper 2014-133
Gleason CC, Bahr DW (1979) Experimental clean combustor program, phase III—final report. NASA CR-135384, June 1979
Gleason CC, Rogers DW, Bahr DW (1975) Experimental clean combustor program, phase II—final report. NASA CR-134971, July 1975
Gupta AK et al (1991) Burner geometry effects on combustion and NO X emission characteristics using a variable geometry swirl combustor. J Propul 7(4):473–480
Iudiciani P et al (2009) Characterization of a multi-swirler fuel injector using simultaneous laser based planar measurements of reaction zone, flow field, and fuel distribution, 2009. GT2009-60278
Johansen KM, Johnston BH, Mongia HC, Sanborn JW (1977) Combustion process testing for reduced wall temperature gradients. In: Proceedings 1977 DARPA/NAVSEA ceramic gas turbine demonstration engine program review
Joshi ND, Mongia HC, Leonard G, Steggmaier JW, Vickers EC (1998) Dry low emissions combustor development. ASME paper 98-GT-310
Kumar V, Panda P, Mongia H, Naik S (2012a) Innovative approaches for reducing CO2 emissions of aviation engines part 1: selection of promising approaches. AIAA Paper 2012-3951
Kumar V, Panda P, Mongia H, Naik S (2012b) Innovative approaches for reducing CO2 emissions of aviation engines part 2: NPSS calibration with existing gas turbine engines. AIAA paper 2012-4228
Kumar V, Panda P, Mongia H, Naik S (2012c) Innovative approaches for reducing CO2 emissions of aviation engines part 3: advanced Brayton cycle optimization. AIAA paper 2012-4175
Kurzke J (2009) Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. GT2009-59745
Lee CM, Chang C, Kramer S, Herbon JT (2013) NASA project develops next generation low-emissions combustor technologies. AIAA paper 2013-540
Li G, Gutmark E (2005) Effect of exhaust nozzle geometry on combustor flow field and combustion characteristics. Proc. Comb. Inst. 30:2893–2901
Li G, Gutmark E (2006) Experimental study of boundary conditions effects on non-reacting and reacting flows in a multi-swirl gas turbine combustor. AIAA J 44(3):444–456
Lieuwen T (2012) Unsteady combustor physics. Cambridge Press, Cambridge
Lieuwen TC, Yang V (Eds) (2005) Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol 210
Longwell JP (1977) Synthetic fuels and combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 3:127–138
M’Bengue L (2010) Toward ACARE 2020: innovative engine architectures to achieve the environmental goals? In: 27th international congress of the aeronautical sciences
McKinney RG, Sepulveda D, Sowa W, Cheung AK (2007) The Pratt &Whitney TALON X low emissions combustor: revolutionary results with evolutionary technology. AIAA 2007-386
Mongia HC (1993) Application of CFD in combustor design technology. AGARD CP-536, pp 12-1/12-18
Mongia HC (1997) Recent progress in low-emissions gas turbine combustors. In: 13th international symposium on air breathing engines, ISABE 1997
Mongia HC (2001a) Gas turbine combustor liner wall temperature calculation methodology. AIAA 2001-3267
Mongia HC (2001b) A synopsis of gas turbine combustor design methodology evolution of last 25 years. ISABE-2001-1086
Mongia HC (2003) TAPS—a 4th generation propulsion combustor technology for low emissions. AIAA paper 2003-2657
Mongia HC (2008) Recent progress in comprehensive modeling of gas turbine combustion. AIAA paper 2008-1445
Mongia HC (2010a) On initiating 3rd generation of correlations for gaseous emissions of aero-propulsion engines. AIAA paper 2010-1529
Mongia HC (2010b) Correlations for gaseous emissions of aero-propulsion engines from sea-level to cruise operation. AIAA paper 2010-1530
Mongia HC (2011a) Engineering aspects of complex gas turbine combustion mixers part I: high ΔT. AIAA paper 2011-107
Mongia HC (2011b) Engineering aspects of complex gas turbine combustion mixers part II: high T3. AIAA paper 2011-106
Mongia HC (2011c) Engineering aspects of complex gas turbine combustion mixers part III: 30 OPR. AIAA paper 2011-5525
Mongia HC (2011d) Engineering aspects of complex gas turbine combustion mixers part IV: swirl cup. AIAA paper 2011-5526
Mongia HC (2011e) Engineering aspects of complex gas turbine combustion mixers part V: 40 OPR. AIAA paper 2011-5527
Mongia HC (2013a) N+ 3 and N+ 4 generation aeropropulsion engine combustors part 1: large engines’ emissions. GT2013-94570
Mongia HC (2013b) N+ 3 and N+ 4 generation aeropropulsion engine combustors part 2: medium size rich-dome engines and lean-domes. GT2013-94571
Mongia HC (2013c) N+ 3 and N+ 4 Generation aeropropulsion engine combustors part 3: small engine emissions and axial staging combustion technology. GT2013-94572
Mongia HC (2013d) N+ 3 and N+ 4 generation aeropropulsion engine combustors part 5: NO x , CO, HC and smoke emissions. AIAA paper 2013-3653
Mongia HC (2013e) N+ 3 and N+ 4 generation aeropropulsion engine combustors part 6: operating conditions, target goals and lifted jets. AIAA paper 2013-3654
Mongia HC, Ambs LL (1974) A model for the combustion and extinction of composite solid propellants during depressurization. Combust Flame 22:59–69
Mongia HC, Smith KF (1978) An empirical/analytical design methodology for gas turbine combustor. AIAA Paper 78-998
Mongia HC, Reynolds RS, Srinivasan R (1986) Multidimensional gas turbine combustion modeling: applications and limitations. AIAA J 24(6):890–904
Mongia HC, Held TJ, Hsiao GC, Pandalai RP (2003) Challenges and progress in controlling dynamics in gas turbine combustors. J Propul Power 19:822–829
Mongia H, Hsiao G, Burrus D, Sreedhar PSVS, Rao A, Naik P (2004a) Combustor diffuser modeling part I: inlet profiles and 2-D calculations. AIAA paper 2004-4168
Mongia H, Hsiao G, Burrus D, Sreedhar PSVS, Rao A (2004b) Combustor diffuser modeling part II: inlet profiles and 3-D calculations. AIAA paper 2004-4169
Mongia H, Hsiao G, Burrus D, Habeeb K, Sreedhar PSVS (2004c) Combustor diffuser modeling part III: validation w/typical separating single passage diffusers combustor diffuser modeling. AIAA paper 2004-4170
Mongia H, Hsiao G, Burrus D, Sreedhar PSVS, Rao A (2004d) Combustor diffuser modeling part IV: effect of cowling geometry, mixer size and nozzle blockage. AIAA paper 2004-4171
Mongia H, Hsiao G, Ravindra MVV, Sreedhar PSVS (2004e) Combustor diffuser modeling part V: validation with a three passage diffuser rig data. AIAA paper 2004-4172
Mongia H, Hsiao G, Mueller M, Dai Z, Ravindra MVV, Sreedhar PSVS, Arvind P (2004f) Combustor diffuser modeling part VI: validation with a four passage diffuser rig data. AIAA paper 2004-4173
Mongia HC, Held TJ, Hsiao GC, Pandalai RP (2005) Incorporation of combustion instability issues into design process: GE aeroderivative and aero engines experience. In: Lieuwen TC, Yang V (eds) Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, vo 210. pp 43–64
Moses CA, Roets PN (2008) Properties, characteristics and combustion performance of SASOL fully synthetic jet fuel. GT2008-50545
Murthy SNB, Mongia HC (1969) Progressive acoustic and weak shock waves in AI, Be and B flames. AIAA paper 1969-540
Nealy DA, Reider SB, Mongia HC (1985) Alternate cooling configuration for gas turbine combustion systems. In: AGARD CP-390, pp 25-1–25-15
Panda P, Kumar V, Mongia H, Naik S (2012a) Innovative approaches for reducing CO2 emissions of aviation engines part 4: turbine exhaust driven thermal cycle TED-T. AIAA paper 2012-4230
Panda P, Kumar V, Mongia H, Naik S (2012b) Innovative approaches for reducing CO2 emissions of aviation engines part 5: turbo reaction-controlled internal combustion system TRCS. AIAA paper 2012-3952
Paskin MD, Ross PT, Mongia HC, Acosta WA (1990) Composite matrix cooling scheme for small gas turbine combustors. AIAA paper 1990-2158
Paskin MD, Mongia HC, Acosta WA (1993) An efficient liner cooling scheme for advanced small gas turbine combustors. AIAA paper 1993-1763
Rida S et al (2012) Imprinted effusion modeling and dynamic CD calculation in gas turbine combustors. GT2012-68804
Rizk NK, Mongia HC (1990) Lean low NO x combustion concept evaluation. In: 23rd international symposium on combustion. The Combustion Institute, pp 1063–1070
Roberts R, Fiorentino A, Greene W (1977) Experimental clean combustor program phase III—final report. NASA CR-135253, Oct 1977
Ross PT, Williams JR, Anderson DA (1983) AIAA J Energy 7:429
Sanborn JW, Mongia HC, Kidwell JR (1983) Design of a low-emission combustor for an automotive gas turbine. AIAA paper 83-0338
Segalman I, McKinney RG, Sturgess GJ, Huang LM (1993) Reduction of NO x by fuel-staging in gas turbine engines-A commitment to the future. In: AGARD Conference Proceedings
Sekar J et al (2014) Liquid jet in cross flow modeling. GT2014-26124
Sen BA et al (2012) Pratt and Whitney gas turbine combustor design using ANSYS fluent and user defined functions. GT2012-70145
Snecma (2014). http://www.snecma.com/-leap-x,381-.html?lang=en. Accessed 13 July 2014
Sung CJ (2014) Personal communication
Sripathi M et al (2014) Laminar flamelet based NO x predictions for gas turbine combustors. GT2014-27258
Stearns EM et al (1982) Energy efficient engine core design and performance report. NASA CR-168069, Dec 1982
Tacina RR (1990) Low NO x potential of gas turbine engines. AIAA paper 90-0550
Tacina R, Mao C-P, Wey C (2004) Experimental investigation of a multiplex fuel injector module with discrete jet swirlers for low emissions combustors. AIAA-2004-0135
Tacina R, Lee P, Wey C (2005a) A lean-direct-injection combustor using a 9 point swirl-venturi fuel injector. ISABE-2005-1106
Tacina R, Wey C, Laing P, Mansour A (2005b) Low-NO x lean-direct injection, multi-point integrated module combustor concept for advanced aircraft gas turbines. NASA/TMX 2002-211347
Tacina KM, Chang CT, He ZJ, Lee P, Dam B, Mongia H (2014) A second generation swirl-venturi lean direct injection combustion concept. AIAA paper 2014–3434
Therkelsen PL, Littlejohn D, Cheng RK (2012) Parametric study of low-swirl injector geometry on its operability. GT2012-68436
Villalva R et al (2013) Medium pressure emissions of a multi-point low NO x combustion system. AIAA paper 2013-1044
Wey C, Bulzan D (2013) Effects of bio-derived fuels on emissions and performance using a 9-point lean direct injection low emissions concept. GT2013-95135
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express his gratitude for the support and encouragement he has received from his colleagues, friends, customers, bosses, and mentors since 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mongia, H.C. (2014). Future Trends in Commercial Aviation Engines’ Combustion. In: Agarwal, A., Pandey, A., Gupta, A., Aggarwal, S., Kushari, A. (eds) Novel Combustion Concepts for Sustainable Energy Development. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2211-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2211-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2210-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2211-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)