Skip to main content

Design of Next Generation Products by Novice Designers Using Function Based Design Interpretation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICoRD'13

Abstract

Several researches confirm that novice designers need to gain many abilities to perform like experts in the field. Design interpretation is a technique to analyze the working product and identify the functions performed by an artifact in the form of a function tree. This paper reports an investigation into the design of an Operating Table by novice designers and the use of Design Interpretation to gain abilities to perform like experts. The observations were made with respect to (1) Organized structure and cognitive action (2) Scoping and information gathering (3) Consideration of alternatives (4) Time spent on activities and tasks (5) gathering basic data (6) adaptive expertise and (7) procedural expertise. The results suggest that novice designers gain by carrying out design interpretation of the current generation when designing the next generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing L, Moss M (2000) Identifying differences between novice and experienced designers, design for excellence. In: Sivaloganathan S, Andrews PTJ (eds) Proceedings of the engineering design conference 2000, professional engineering Publishing, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing LTM (2003) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res Eng Des 14:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mendis MV, Sivaloganathan S (2000) Design interpretation: a methodology for adaptive design, the Journal of the institution of engineers Sri-Lanka. May 2000. Won the best paper award for the year 1999/2000

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Des Stud 25(5):427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chi TH (2006) Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, Cambridge, pp 21–29 (Chapter 2)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cross N, Clayburn Cross A (1998) Expertise in engineering design. Res Eng Des 10:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kavakli M, Suwa M, Gero JS, Purcell T (1999) Sketching interpretation in novice and expert designers. In: Gero JS, Tversky B (eds) Visual and spatial reasoning in design, key centre of design computing and cognition, University of Sydney, Sydney, pp 209–219

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kavakli M, Gero JS (2001) The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers. Des Stud 23(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Atman CJ, Adams RS, Cardelia ME, Turns J, Mosborg S, Saleem J (2007) Engineering design processes: a comparison of students and expert practitioners. J Eng Educ 96(4):359–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adams RS, Turns J, Atman CJ (2003) What Could Design Learning Look Like? In: Design thinking research symposium VI, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pahl G, Beitz W, Schulz H-J (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ulrich K, Eppinger S (2011) Product design and development, 5th edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ullman D (2003) The mechanical design process, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andreassen MM (1998) Conceptual design capture, keynote paper. In: Sivaloganathan S, Shahin TMM (eds) Proceedings of the engineering design conference ‘98, Professional Engineering Publishing, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, pp 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  15. Otto K, Wood K (2006) Product design. Tata McGrawHill, India

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abeer A, Aisha A, Aysha A, Shaikha A (2012) Design and development of a simple but world class operating table, graduation project report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, UAE

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge their gratitude to the maintenance department of Tawam Hospital in UAE and Professor Yousef AlHaik and Dr AbdelHamid Mourad of UAEU for their intellectual contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sivaloganathan, S., Abdulrahman, A., Al Dousari, S., Al Shamsi, A., Al Ameri, A. (2013). Design of Next Generation Products by Novice Designers Using Function Based Design Interpretation. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R. (eds) ICoRD'13. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_94

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_94

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, India

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1049-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1050-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics